Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Stuhoo

The State of IU's Defense

Recommended Posts

I don't think RJ is a plus defender. He has his moments though. I also think Hartman is a good enough defender. The good and bad is that our best defenders may be our freshmen. Sad statement for the upper classmen but a real positive for the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love Hartman as a hardnosed team player but he just doesn't seem to have the lateral quickness to keep his man from driving around him.

 

Hartman played good defense on Shields of Nebraska.  Yes, he got in foul trouble but Hartman forced bad shots and played good position defense on Shields.  Hartman seems to be the bailout foul guy for this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One game does not demonstrate a change to me.  If we can go three or four then I will believe it.  Yes the defense was much better last night, but the long term trend is something different. 

Sorry to put a drag on an otherwise positive post.  I just am not convinced the state of our defense is any different this morning than it was Tuesday morning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One game does not demonstrate a change to me.  If we can go three or four then I will believe it.  Yes the defense was much better last night, but the long term trend is something different. 

Sorry to put a drag on an otherwise positive post.  I just am not convinced the state of our defense is any different this morning that it was Tuesday morning.

 

I concur.  I was certainly encouraged by our D last night within the context of the game. But that was not a typical game in terms of of pace...it's a lot easier to stay in front of a guy when he's intentionally not trying to drive on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with your analysis Stuhoo except I would move Collin up with Max to the "holding steady and good enough" category. IMO Collin does a lot of little/good things on defense with smarts and effort that make up for his lack of quickness. I will say I am basing my analysis of Collin on his entire body of work, including last year where in my opinion he played a little better then he has so far this year.

 

So far--the freshmen are generally fundamentally solid on defense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hartman played good defense on Shields of Nebraska.  Yes, he got in foul trouble but Hartman forced bad shots and played good position defense on Shields.  Hartman seems to be the bailout foul guy for this team.

 It seems like Collin gets caught being the last line of defense,kind of like a hockey goalie at the net.

That's more times than not a result of the guards not stopping penetration or the other two bigs jumping the passing lanes and losing position.I think its more a lack of fundamental defensive principles than the last guy standing being a poor defender.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems like Collin gets caught being the last line of defense,kind of like a hockey goalie at the net.
That's more times than not a result of the guards not stopping penetration or the other two bigs jumping the passing lanes and losing position.I think its more a lack of fundamental defensive principles than the last guy standing being a poor defender.

Troy Williams knee says hello.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By looking at this analysis we should have a really good defense and while maybe it looked that way this week I am not sure if that is the case. There is something to be said for TEAM defense... if every individual is good I guess that could mean a great team defense but as others have said if 1 person is out of position that really hampers the next guy.... I also still don't see the bad defense attributed to NZ3?

 

I just happened to look at Kenpom before coming here and was going to mention it somewhere, what a perfect place to mention it... we are now in the top 100 (90th) in defense, along with top 20 (17th) on offense, and KenPom has us rated as the 25th best team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By looking at this analysis we should have a really good defense and while maybe it looked that way this week I am not sure if that is the case. There is something to be said for TEAM defense... if every individual is good I guess that could mean a great team defense but as others have said if 1 person is out of position that really hampers the next guy.... I also still don't see the bad defense attributed to NZ3?

I just happened to look at Kenpom before coming here and was going to mention it somewhere, what a perfect place to mention it... we are now in the top 100 (90th) in defense, along with top 20 (17th) on offense, and KenPom has us rated as the 25th best team.

JBJ and NZ are by far the two biggest defensive liabilities on the team

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JBJ and NZ are by far the two biggest defensive liabilities on the team

I agree with JBJ 100%.... I have watched every game and have re-watched many of them specifically looking at defensive sets... and I see NZ putting in effort and being in the right position... He does get beat on the dribble due to his lack of speed however he stays close, he doesn't just give up and watch them get all the way to the rim.

 

This I agree. But without Z hitting shots he adds nothing. JBJ always demanded attention on offense, thus giving more open court possibilities.

NZ gets a lot of attention, even after missing a lot of shots lately he is rarely ever left alone to spot up, the defensive player is obviously told not to help off of him. That is demanding attention and opening up the court even if his shots aren't falling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is all about personnel IMO. When you have a lineup of Yogi, JBJ, RoJo, TW, Bryant, you have two BIG minus defenders in JBJ and Troy, then you have two average defenders in Yogi/Bryant, and one above average in RoJo. 

 

When you have two terrible defenders in a lineup of five it brings everyone else down at least a notch. With JBJ out, we've replaced his defense with Hartman (average) and OG/Morgan (appear to be above average), it changes the dynamic of everything. Now they really only have to cover to TW, and let's be real he's a bad defender, but JBJ is horrendous. Troy's gambles aren't as costly now, because everyone else is in position behind him. 

 

Take the names out of it, you just can't have two terrible defenders in the lineup, you can probably cover for one, but not two. It's a huge trickle down effect. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 It seems like Collin gets caught being the last line of defense,kind of like a hockey goalie at the net.

That's more times than not a result of the guards not stopping penetration or the other two bigs jumping the passing lanes and losing position.I think its more a lack of fundamental defensive principles than the last guy standing being a poor defender.

Seems to be the only one who comes running when our guards and Troy yell HELP!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×