Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

I want the best players that we can get. I don't care what state they are from. Watford is better than both Brooks and TJD, so if we can only get 1 of the 3 I want Watford. 

Kind of where I am. Watford being a legacy player tips the scales vs other around the country players.

Posted
I want the best players that we can get. I don't care what state they are from. Watford is better than both Brooks and TJD, so if we can only get 1 of the 3 I want Watford. 

Agreed, I want the best players with good character from Indiana or anywhere. I must admit that I really liked CWat’s family enjoying the big shot he made.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
In this case I'd go for Watford and then go hard after Hurt. 

The chances of landing both Hurt and Watford are slim to none. In the unrealistic chance we do land them both, they'll be fine after a season.

Give me Jackson-Davis and Brooks. I believe one (TJD) contributes immediately along with Smith, Davis, Thompson, and Forrester in the front court.

The inverse would be a year of Hurt and Watford staring and the others contributing.

I want an experienced team that has a few good underclassman that contribute but is led by upperclassmen. TJD and KB could both see their junior season at Iu.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
9 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:


The chances of landing both Hurt and Watford are slim to none. In the unrealistic chance we do land them both, they'll be fine after a season.

Give me Jackson-Davis and Brooks. I believe one (TJD) contributes immediately along with Smith, Davis, Thompson, and Forrester in the front court.

The inverse would be a year of Hurt and Watford staring and the others contributing.

I want an experienced team that has a few good underclassman that contribute but is led by upperclassmen. TJD and KB could both see their junior season at Iu.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I agree the chances are slim, since our chances with Hurt are very slim to begin with. If we land TW then I think our chances go up. We already have his buddy Race. TW would give him a top 10 player to play with. I think we'd be title contenders with the two of them. Conference contenders for sure. 

Posted
Our chances with Hurt aren’t terrible. Corey Evans said we were a darkhorse in his recruitment. We aren’t the frontrunners right now, but if we can get an official visit we will be in a position to have a decent chance at the end.

I'm not sure why people keep suggesting we don't have a shot with Hurt when we've been told we absolutely have a shot.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
6 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Me spitballing off hints and tweets and facts.


Brooks and TJD may want to play together. As evidenced by several things. IF this is the case and IU wants TJD, it could affect how we approach TW vs Brooks.

I don’t know any of this for sure but I wonder how much this plays into things.



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Yeah, and it would be a severe kick to the balls if both TJD and Brooks end up at Purdue, after we get Watford.

Posted

I'm not sure why people keep suggesting we don't have a shot with Hurt when we've been told we absolutely have a shot.

Sent from my Pixel XL using BtownBanners mobile app


I have a chance to win the lottery but they're not good. IU has a chance to land Hurt but it's unlikely.

I would love to land Watford and I think we have a shot. I highly doubt we land both Watford and Hurt. I would prefer Jackson-Davis and Brooks.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
8 minutes ago, rebelhoosier848891 said:

I would be thrilled with any of the four—-we may have to go with first come—first served! If a 5 Star wants to come—welcome them. We can’t afford to lose them with the hope we MAY get another one. I imagine Miller is letting them know they better decide quickly or risk losing out. Take the first 2 out of the 4 who are ready to be Hoosiers NOW. I think that may be TJD and Watford....


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

That would not make me mad.

Posted
9 minutes ago, rebelhoosier848891 said:

I would be thrilled with any of the four—-we may have to go with first come—first served! If a 5 Star wants to come—welcome them. We can’t afford to lose them with the hope we MAY get another one. I imagine Miller is letting them know they better decide quickly or risk losing out. Take the first 2 out of the 4 who are ready to be Hoosiers NOW. I think that may be TJD and Watford....


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Right! If Watford wants to come and we don't accept it because we are waiting on the other 3 and T-Dub commits elsewhere and 2 of the other 3 don't come, I'll be PO'd.

Posted
I would be thrilled with any of the four—-we may have to go with first come—first served! If a 5 Star wants to come—welcome them. We can’t afford to lose them with the hope we MAY get another one. I imagine Miller is letting them know they better decide quickly or risk losing out. Take the first 2 out of the 4 who are ready to be Hoosiers NOW. I think that may be TJD and Watford....


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

I would take that in a heartbeat. Our frontcourt could end up being loaded in 2019. I just don't see how we could make it work with two players ready to start.

Davis - Forrester
Moore - Thompson
Smith - Hunter

Then throw in TJD and Watford. There's not enough minutes.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...