Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
8 minutes ago, lillurk said:

Like everyone I'm pleased about this both conceptually and on a player skill basis.

I do hope everyone realizes and accepts that this increases game-to-game variance somewhat , though you can mitigate if by ORebs, defense, still being capable of getting to the rim and the line.

I can just foresee losing a close road game by 2 while shooting 10/35 from 3 and some folks being grumpy that we “took too many 3s” like a week after we beat a top ten team because we shot 18/38 from 3.

Couldn't stand when people would complain about that with Crean's teams

Posted
17 minutes ago, lillurk said:

Like everyone I'm pleased about this both conceptually and on a player skill basis.

I do hope everyone realizes and accepts that this increases game-to-game variance somewhat , though you can mitigate if by ORebs, defense, still being capable of getting to the rim and the line.

I can just foresee losing a close road game by 2 while shooting 10/35 from 3 and some folks being grumpy that we “took too many 3s” like a week after we beat a top ten team because we shot 18/38 from 3.

Like you stated, that is why they need to be good OReb team to mitigate those bad shooting nights.  Hopefully, with so many shooters, there will be one or 2 that are hitting when a couple of others have an "off night".  So far, it looks like he is putting a team together that will work hard which is what IU fans will appreciate.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

Couldn't stand when people would complain about that with Crean's teams

Yeah.  My ears are still bleeding from listening to Dick Vitale scream “they need to throw the ball into Cody” every possession, every time he did one of our games.

Posted
33 minutes ago, IUHoosierJoe said:

Yeah.  My ears are still bleeding from listening to Dick Vitale scream “they need to throw the ball into Cody” every possession, every time he did one of our games.

I was screaming the same thing. Zeller was just that good. Same for TJD. Same for DJ white. Same for Jeffries. Some dudes are that good and worth it. This roster does have that.

Posted
47 minutes ago, jermhoosierfan said:

Like you stated, that is why they need to be good OReb team to mitigate those bad shooting nights.  Hopefully, with so many shooters, there will be one or 2 that are hitting when a couple of others have an "off night".  So far, it looks like he is putting a team together that will work hard which is what IU fans will appreciate.

Idk if we’ll ever be a great offensive rebounding team. I don’t think DDV really emphasizes that if I remember correctly 

Posted
5 minutes ago, sirhoosierlot said:

Idk if we’ll ever be a great offensive rebounding team. I don’t think DDV really emphasizes that if I remember correctly 

It's kind of weird thing. Because it's great to be able to grab 2nd chances. At the same time, gotta capitalize. At the same time, high offensive rebounding numbers(per game) means you're missing a lot. A high FG% mixed with a high OFF Reb% is ideal.

Posted
1 hour ago, lillurk said:

I do hope everyone realizes and accepts that this increases game-to-game variance somewhat , though you can mitigate if by ORebs, defense, still being capable of getting to the rim and the line.

I can just foresee losing a close road game by 2 while shooting 10/35 from 3 and some folks being grumpy that we “took too many 3s” like a week after we beat a top ten team because we shot 18/38 from 3.

It shouldn’t increase your variance much if you can do all the other things you mentioned and win multiple ways. 
 

Otherwise it’s a sub-optimal strategy in a sport that comes down to one single elimination tournament.  
 

(I’m ultimately fine with whatever CDD does next year, in that regard, because nobody is or should be expecting him to be making a deep tourney run in year 1).

Posted
Just now, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

 

he had plenty of offense ran through him 

And it still wasn't enough. Against Kentucky, he took to Anthony Davis and outplayed him in both games. That was a common theme against most opponents. Seemed we tried to force it more against the teams he struggled against like Minnesota and Syracuse.

Posted
Just now, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

And it still wasn't enough. Against Kentucky, he took to Anthony Davis and outplayed him in both games. That was a common theme against most opponents. Seemed we tried to force it more against the teams he struggled against like Minnesota and Syracuse.

Wasn't enough for what? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, dwtaylor1055 said:

I would imagine Claude would start here, could start at the 2 or 3 given he is 6'6"

Would definitely start, but now you're getting into the "only one ball" territory. Unless Wilkerson and DeVries become catch and shoot guys, that's a lot of high usage players on the court at once.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...