Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

Transfer Portal w IU Interest

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Oof…


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Huh?

He was in the eight man rotation of the national champion team.  And check his numbers compared to Alex Condon if he played Condon's minutes:

Condon 10.6 points, 7.5 rebounds, 1.3 blocks

Alexis 9.9 points, 7.4 rebounds, 1.3 blocks

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

Gabe Cupps and Jakai Newton were both 3* transfers on 247. How do they have Sam Alexis as a NR/0* transfer? He was more productive than either of them on a better team. lmao

https://247sports.com/player/sam-alexis-46133294/

I'm finding that players enter so quickly that often they don't get rated.  On3 seems to be a little better about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Gonna be Leo Curtis and Federico and then they call it a day? Like that Greek kid quite a bit. Was hoping the Sorber talk had juice.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

I would be happy to add Leo Curtis and Federiko. I think that would get us to 12 with 7 seniors?

I'd like to see them get a full 13 (even though a lot of teams only do 12) with a freshman or rising sophomore... for continuity's sake

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Two years ago it projected Peyton Sparks to play more than 20 mpg and Malik Reneau to play 18 mpg

Definitely a good data point in the useless column. 

Last I looked a week or two ago, it had names for IU that I didn’t even recognize and they were getting minutes.

We turned the page and we will see what it looks like in 7 months.  All we actually know is what we are leaving behind, and for me that’s enough at the moment.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

Gabe Cupps and Jakai Newton were both 3* transfers on 247. How do they have Sam Alexis as a NR/0* transfer? He was more productive than either of them on a better team. lmao

https://247sports.com/player/sam-alexis-46133294/

@RaceToTheTop has a good response but it’s also a choice in methodology. I don’t know if any of the services really explain how they rank, but I know that for 247 football, they’re ranking based on potential/ceiling/projection, which makes some sense here.

Alexis is probably capped at “mid-major 2nd/3rd team and all-defense” or “high-major backup.” Cupps and Newton each have 3 years left and could conceivably get to, say, “plus high-major starter.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Lol. In 11 minutes per game. You realize that stat is time based. And his coach could have played him any amount of minutes he chose. And he chose not to play him in the most Important games of the year.

He’s got some size, versatility, and probably a willing bench piece. They can’t all be starters. And that’s ok. Calling it like it is.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Yes, agree. So how is that an "Oof" ?

I get he doesn't wow anyone but like you said they can't all be starters...

Seems like a kid who will play a limited role and help build a strong culture. That's a good thing IMO. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One note on Torvik and ceiling: if he does it anything like Pomeroy, there are minor program and coach adjustments to preseason rankings.

So e.g. the same roster UConn, DePaul, and Wisconsin-Whitewater might not be ranked identically.

All that to say there probably is a preseason ceiling for IU if there’s an adjustment based on the recent past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Like others I would be happy to see some underclassmen but I will caution everyone that I’m not sure the old way of thinking about roster building holds any more.

It would be nice to see some guys develop, and I think that with regional or in-state prospects that will still make some sense. But if IU pulls a frosh from the east coast, he plays minimally, but then Maryland is convinced he’s worth a mint after his freshman year? Well, all your development and the sunk costs of his year at IU benefit Maryland, maybe even if you’re willing to match his offer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes, agree. So how is that an "Oof" ?
I get he doesn't wow anyone but like you said they can't all be starters...
Seems like a kid who will play a limited role and help build a strong culture. That's a good thing IMO. 

Because we lack good Bigs and have limited roster space at this time. Probably after this weekend it will make more sense. Just unspectacular in a “position of need”. As a bench guy it’s cool.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Because we lack good Bigs and have limited roster space at this time. Probably after this weekend it will make more sense. Just unspectacular in a “position of need”. As a bench guy it’s cool.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Curious your thoughts on the Baba Miller and Fed x2? Anyone else you've seen us in the mix with (or not) you'd prefer?

Genuinely asking because I respect your takes. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Because we lack good Bigs and have limited roster space at this time. Probably after this weekend it will make more sense. Just unspectacular in a “position of need”. As a bench guy it’s cool.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

You don’t really get to pick the order of when people commit / visit lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


I’m sure that’s the vision. Alexis isn’t Hansberry. But if I squint my eyes I can see it.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Just looked. By rankings, Hansberry in the portal this year looks very similar to Alexis in the portal last year. Hansberry looked better offensively and Alexis defensively especially as a shot blocker.  Alexis just happened to go to the best team in the country with a bounty of big men.
 

An interesting pick up seemingly out of nowhere. Bolsters the roster a bit depth wise and fills a need.  

Edited by Okram

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Old news now but I thought the Desmond Claude contact was interesting.

1. probably just due diligence

2. does indicate they probably still have quite a bit of dough to splash

3. wonder if the vision is/was a sort of Swiss Army knife 6th man.

4. more broadly, I think IU’s gonna play teams who’s best player is the best guy on the floor…but IU’s 4th or 5th best guy in most lineups doesn’t look likely to be very weak.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×