Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, 4iufourever said:

It was in alphabetical order....Thank goodness.  I give it about a negative 1000000% chance it would be Alford, but they probably still felt obligated to put him on the list.  I will quit watching IU if they do. 

Moreso just a sign of a bad list alphabetical or not. lol 

Posted

One factor to think about is a prospective coach's experience with NIL players.  We talk about how much $$ we have for NIL, but the most talented ones want money, PT, and an opportunity to showcase themselves.  I'd argue that those players are quite different than the players Stevens had at Butler.  There has to be some question of either how well he can succeed with ego-driven mercenaries or can he build more in the traditional way at IU.  IDK, but I'm inclined to believe he'd be more successful going more the traditional route.

Brad Stevens remains my #1 choice BTW.

Posted
Some investigative reporter in Indiana would probably generate some notoriety for themselves by digging into the Quinn Buckner era and writing an exposé. I’m sure there is plenty to cover and probably enough publicly available info to paint a very unpretty picture. 
So much shady stuff went on imo it's probably unreal

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Posted
7 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Some investigative reporter in Indiana would probably generate some notoriety for themselves by digging into the Quinn Buckner era and writing an exposé. I’m sure there is plenty to cover and probably enough publicly available info to paint a very unpretty picture. 

I would love this.  FOIA some emails.  I don’t know the conflict disclosure requirements, but I bet Woody is a client of Quinn’s wealth management firm and I also bet they do real estate deals together.  
 

Quinn’s cronyism and neglect of IUBB has been disgusting and disgraceful.

Posted
1 minute ago, pumpfake said:

One factor to think about is a prospective coach's experience with NIL players.  We talk about how much $$ we have for NIL, but the most talented ones want money, PT, and an opportunity to showcase themselves.  I'd argue that those players are quite different than the players Stevens had at Butler.  There has to be some question of either how well he can succeed with ego-driven mercenaries or can he build more in the traditional way at IU.  IDK, but I'm inclined to believe he'd be more successful going more the traditional route.

Brad Stevens remains my #1 choice BTW.

I think you would see more of the Matt Painter approach with Stevens with recruiting. I don’t see him hitting the portal to fill an entire roster (may have to year 1) but hitting the portal to fill a missing piece or 2.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Some investigative reporter in Indiana would probably generate some notoriety for themselves by digging into the Quinn Buckner era and writing an exposé. I’m sure there is plenty to cover and probably enough publicly available info to paint a very unpretty picture. 

No.  Just don't.

I do not like personally attacking anyone.  This includes Woodson and Buckner and Knight.  Maybe point out bad decisions, but why toss old players under the bus?  Even if they are doing crappy jobs in our opinions, say that.  Otherwise, it really is petty and seeking some sort of retribution.  

Oh well.  MHO.

Posted
2 minutes ago, pumpfake said:

One factor to think about is a prospective coach's experience with NIL players.  We talk about how much $$ we have for NIL, but the most talented ones want money, PT, and an opportunity to showcase themselves.  I'd argue that those players are quite different than the players Stevens had at Butler.  There has to be some question of either how well he can succeed with ego-driven mercenaries or can he build more in the traditional way at IU.  IDK, but I'm inclined to believe he'd be more successful going more the traditional route.

Brad Stevens remains my #1 choice BTW.

You could argue those are quite different than the Butler kids, and I'd agree, not so much different than the NBA players he's working with now, though. 

Posted
14 minutes ago, Hornsby said:

I heard for years few would never come here. What changed?

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

My opinion?  NIL, for one.  And #2, the contract Curt Cignetti got shows that we now have a president and AD extremely serious about athletics.  Coaches like Few and probably others might believe they can come here and put themselves on the Mount Rushmore of college basketball coaches.

Posted
43 minutes ago, 94Hoosier said:

Osterman Was just on 107.5.  
 

Most of what he said was worthless, but at the very end, I think he seemed to make it very clear that Woody is not wanting to go quietly   

Well it will be far from quiet tomorrow.

Posted
1 minute ago, BlueDevil said:

I think you would see more of the Matt Painter approach with Stevens with recruiting. I don’t see him hitting the portal to fill an entire roster (may have to year 1) but hitting the portal to fill a missing piece or 2.

Braden Smith, Jack Benter, and TKR wouldn't be Boilers, you say? Smh

Probably not Loyer, but he certainly wouldn't have been starting as a FR, maybe not last year. 

Posted
Nothing worse than rich and powerful people who feel they are above accountability. Kick this guy to the curb Scott. He doesn’t deserve an ounce of good will. 
The arrogance and entitlement of those two is just sickening.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...