They “Retired” Coach Woodson Thread

[Magisterium 421]

9 minutes ago, Kentuckysucks said:

It's Jay Wright.  Brad and Billy are the backups.

I wasn’t going to post this but I might as well now: my (imaginary) sources tell me Steve Kerr has grown tired of the NBA grind and may be thinking about coaching at the college level.

I think we can all probably connect the (fake) dots here….vbg

[MemphisHoosier 2,278]

1 hour ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Regardless of how this season ends, and if he's still the coach, Woody has to hit a home run in the portal with probably a minimum of 4 openings and maybe as many as 6 or more depending on what the current roster does and I'm not confident he can do that.

...and the track record for programs that bring in 4+ transfers in once cycle is by-and-large not great

[IUrocker 2,445]

Ive also seen that apparently, BP isn’t a fan of Under Armour, which is who Auburn has, and it’s been said that Pearl’s #1 preferred apparel company is Adidas because of their NIL program structure….hmmm, I might know a school that could help him out with that. 

[cleeter 2,818]

Ive also seen that apparently, BP isn’t a fan of Under Armour, which is who Auburn has, and it’s been said that Pearl’s #1 preferred apparel company is Adidas because of their NIL program structure….hmmm, I might know a school that could help him out with that. 

And he wants a basketball only practice facility. Cook Hall awaits you my friend.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[IUHAHN81 3,079]

Let's say we lock down Bruce. How long does he coach? Are we doing this all over again in 5-6 years? That is the only drawback to hiring a coach of his age imo. No doubt he'd win and energize the program. I'd be elated to have him. The other side of me says if we go after Dusty, he's someone who could be here for a couple decades if he pans out. Sure it's a big IF. Must say, I'm torn. 

[Hoosierfan2017 23,821]

18 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

Who was the 1st choice? I don't recall anything like that. She wasn't ok with Fitzgerald but that doesn't mean he was #1. Quite frankly we got the best we could get imo

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 

I remember reading that Fitz had a great interview for the position but Whitten told Dolson no. A little reading between the lines on my end I suppose, but that to me sounds like he went to get a Fitz hire approved but was rejected. 

I have zero issues with the Cog hire and am really excited for the season, but that to me was an indicator of Whitten’s approach to athletics (I.e., firmly within the lines). 

[IUHoosierJoe 1,903]

3 minutes ago, IUHAHN81 said:

Let's say we lock down Bruce. How long does he coach? Are we doing this all over again in 5-6 years? That is the only drawback to hiring a coach of his age imo. No doubt he'd win and energize the program. I'd be elated to have him. The other side of me says if we go after Dusty, he's someone who could be here for a couple decades if he pans out. Sure it's a big IF. Must say, I'm torn. 

And I don’t believe anybody is completely risk free.  You can poke holes in anybody’s resume, although the holes in Pearl’s would be very small.

[mdiu28 2,562]

5 minutes ago, IUHAHN81 said:

Let's say we lock down Bruce. How long does he coach? Are we doing this all over again in 5-6 years? That is the only drawback to hiring a coach of his age imo. No doubt he'd win and energize the program. I'd be elated to have him. The other side of me says if we go after Dusty, he's someone who could be here for a couple decades if he pans out. Sure it's a big IF. Must say, I'm torn. 

The risk/reward with Pearl, IMO, is much better than Dusty at the moment. 

Dusty could be the next K but he could also be the next Archie Miller. You know what you're getting in Pearl. A winner with a good track record in March. 

[Hornsby 3,416]

Let's say we lock down Bruce. How long does he coach? Are we doing this all over again in 5-6 years? That is the only drawback to hiring a coach of his age imo. No doubt he'd win and energize the program. I'd be elated to have him. The other side of me says if we go after Dusty, he's someone who could be here for a couple decades if he pans out. Sure it's a big IF. Must say, I'm torn. 

Pearl for six years is fine he is a proven winner. Would be our best coach since Sampson.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[BlueDevil 9,359]

Just now, Hornsby said:

Pearl for six years is fine he is a proven winner. Would be our best coach since Sampson.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

Plus I think Pearl would be around for longer than 6

[Hornsby 3,416]

Plus I think Pearl would be around for longer than 6

I agree

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[cbp4iu 2,106]

1 hour ago, Chris007 said:

Not sure if I could have said it better.

What he’s saying is Teri Moren has a title to win first then will operate as the first men’s/womens coach in basketball. 

[rcbowla 7,779]

I remember reading that Fitz had a great interview for the position but Whitten told Dolson no. A little reading between the lines on my end I suppose, but that to me sounds like he went to get a Fitz hire approved but was rejected. 
I have zero issues with the Cog hire and am really excited for the season, but that to me was an indicator of Whitten’s approach to athletics (I.e., firmly within the lines). 

That's a fair assumption I suppose.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

2 hours ago, FWHoosier84 said:

That’s what has annoyed me about this season. Let’s wait until we’re on the CTI bubble to make actual changes

I know, it definitely makes all the more frustrating.  He’s so set in his ways that he wouldn’t make a change like this until it is too late or almost too late

[Trish 12,986]

47 minutes ago, Magisterium said:

So Brad and Billy have finally come to their senses? Awesome 

That’s funny because my friend told me he saw Brad Steven’s walking down Kirkwood yesterday. I’ll call my real estate agent friend tomorrow to see if they’ve heard anything. 

[AZ Hoosier 9,612]

Trying to temper the excitement about this whole discussion in my head... I've seen this a movie couple of times before... didn't care for the endings then... hopefully this one ends differently...

[IUFAN1976 4,320]

2 hours ago, lillurk said:

Yes, they’ve also basically glued the backup frontcourt transfers to the bench and played some minutes w/MM at the 4. He really hasn’t adjusted to the season being 40% as long as the NBA season, these things were obvious to anyone who knew ball in July, let along November, and I don’t get to see practice. 

That’s because he always thinks he’s the smartest man in the room and he’s to stubborn and set in his ways to adjust until it’s too late or has to be told.  

[AH1971 2,294]

56 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

Whiten vetoed Dolson’s first choice for the football job. It’s good that she doesn’t hate sports like the last President, but I wouldn’t count on her being anything more than a neutral factor when it comes to sports. 

Fitzgerald still has a lengthy uphill civil battle to fight on top of any potential fall out from the NCAA while they are still in power. Totally understandable why the university would pass on Fitzgerald at this time, he’s not out of the water yet.

[IUrocker 2,445]

19 minutes ago, IUHAHN81 said:

Let's say we lock down Bruce. How long does he coach? Are we doing this all over again in 5-6 years? That is the only drawback to hiring a coach of his age imo. No doubt he'd win and energize the program. I'd be elated to have him. The other side of me says if we go after Dusty, he's someone who could be here for a couple decades if he pans out. Sure it's a big IF. Must say, I'm torn. 

I’m fine with getting Bruce in here for 5-7 years to energize the program while Dusty spends time at another high major program for those 5-7 years proving himself.  Then when Pearl decides to hang it up, we bring in Dusty.

[cbp4iu 2,106]

34 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

Great assumption by you . 

So what percentage are you having now… still 50/50 this goes down?