Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Herotime

What constitutes “BACK”?

Recommended Posts

Not on subject but why do I enjoy seeing Sean Miller getting beat by 40 points so much?

And Archie asking Rhode Island fans for patience on Twitter.

But I don’t get much satisfaction seeing these guy struggle when our team is so awful.

To me…..Its going on a run long enough to garner national respect again. Probably need to get to an Elite 8 or a couple sweet sixteen runs to get there. I don’t anticipate any of this happening with Woody. He had a minimally decent start and gave all the detractors all the ammo they need with this season.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


And Archie asking Rhode Island fans for patience on Twitter.

But I don’t get much satisfaction seeing these guy struggle when our team is so awful.

To me…..Its going on a run long enough to garner national respect again. Probably need to get to an Elite 8 or a couple sweet sixteen runs to get there. I don’t anticipate any of this happening with Woody. He had a minimally decent start and gave all the detractors all the ammo they need with this season.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

My ill will towards Sean has nothing to do with Archie.  I really hope Archie does well going forward in his career.  I just can't stand how big a cheater Sean was and is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My ill will towards Sean has nothing to do with Archie.  I really hope Archie does well going forward in his career.  I just can't stand how big a cheater Sean was and is.

Fair. For about 75 years of basketball “cheating” has separated the winners and the losers. I can almost guarantee that whatever the new competitive advantage is, Indiana will be last to implement it.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hoosier DaDa said:

My ill will towards Sean has nothing to do with Archie.  I really hope Archie does well going forward in his career.  I just can't stand how big a cheater Sean was and is.

Yeah, we got a pretty "up close and personal" view here in the Grand Canyon State.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We are kind of like Alabama before Saban.  Some small spurts that got us excited but nothing really anywhere close to back.  Alabama finally decided they needed to go get their guy AND their guy said yes. Seems like IU went hard after their guy last time but when he said no the admin hoped Woody could pull out a miracle. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I’d say if we were: 

-consensus top team in conf (maybe 2nd best at worst)

-make the tourney every year

-top 4 seed and/or make the 2nd weekend at least 50% of the time or more

-occasional FF run 4-5 years 

-and of course a title amongst that would cement that coach and program as back 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Fair. For about 75 years of basketball “cheating” has separated the winners and the losers. I can almost guarantee that whatever the new competitive advantage is, Indiana will be last to implement it.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Pretty sure IU was the first program to implement NIL program even before it became legal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great question! 
 

In my opinion. I believe Indiana being “back” would mean being consistently ranked in the Top 25 year after year, if not Top 10 in multiple pre-season polls. Multiple Elite 8 appearances in 5 years or less. 
 

Indiana would be back then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Hornsby said:

I guess making the round of 32 and getting blown out is back to dolson.

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

 

It definitely will get you a raise under Dolson. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/28/2024 at 3:13 PM, Herotime said:

 

Personally, back would mean we’ve hung Banner 6, gone to back to back Final Fours, —OR— 3 Final Fours in five years. I admit this isn’t scientific or anything, and I’m open to being persuaded. But that’s how I see “BACK.”

What say you?

Unreasonable and basically unachievable -- anywhere. 3 FF's in 5 years?? Haven't read through this thread but don't think we ever did that before, so confused as to how in the world doing so, for the first time, would be 'back.''

For me, conference championships absolutely matter. They -- along with regularly competing at the top of conference -- are a much better barometer of how good a team/school is than its MM runs, which, clearly, are 1 and done games in the 'madness' setting of the tourney. Winning well regularly in conference is the route to a championship, in any event.

I'll go with regularly competing at the top of the B1G, with at least 1 conf championship, and consistent NCAA tourney runs, no NIT's, with multiple SW16's and at least 1 EE over a 5-6 year period (with the assumption that level of success continues forward)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HoosierHoopster said:

Unreasonable and basically unachievable -- anywhere. 3 FF's in 5 years?? Haven't read through this thread but don't think we ever did that before, so confused as to how in the world doing so, for the first time, would be 'back.''

For me, conference championships absolutely matter. They -- along with regularly competing at the top of conference -- are a much better barometer of how good a team/school is than its MM runs, which, clearly, are 1 and done games in the 'madness' setting of the tourney. Winning well regularly in conference is the route to a championship, in any event.

I'll go with regularly competing at the top of the B1G, with at least 1 conf championship, and consistent NCAA tourney runs, no NIT's, with multiple SW16's and at least 1 EE over a 5-6 year period (with the assumption that level of success continues forward)

What do you mean when you say “unreasonable and unachievable anywhere” ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×