Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Full Schedule

11/5 - Western Illinois - (KP: 294, NET: 305)

11/9 - Portland State - (KP: 286, NET: 265)

11/12 - North Alabama - (KP: 284, NET: 309)

11/16 - Troy - (KP: 249, NET: 259)

11/20 -  Princeton - (KP: 175, NET: 183)

11/25 - Louisiana Tech - (KP: 141, NET: 123)

11/30 - South Dakota State - (KP: 92, NET: 99)

12/3 - Florida State (B1G/ACC Challenge) - (KP: 14, NET: 15)

12/10 - UCONN (Jimmy V Classic) - (KP: 98, NET: 91)

12/21 - Notre Dame (Crossroads Classic) - (KP: 97, NET: 111)

12/29 - Arkansas - (KP: 54, NET: 60)

B1G pairings

Home: Iowa, Northwestern, MSU

Home/Away: Nebraska, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Maryland, PSU, OSU, PU

Away: Illinois, Rutgers, Michigan

 

Posted
Would prefer mediocre out of conference games. Seems like the committee values overall wins and that seems our best path to the dance


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners


Speaking of...

The "committee" ([emoji849]) should come out with their criteria before the season starts. And maybe they do. But I find it ridiculous that only after the tournament selection is complete is when anyone finally hears, "Oh, well this year they/we really focused on number of wins vs quality/SOS, etc." Teams have a right to schedule to their benefit. I guess they did somewhat provide an inkling of what they are looking for this year with the Quad ranks and such, but to then hear the bubble was essentially determined quantity of wins makes that whole system seem like a complete waste of time.





Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
Would prefer mediocre out of conference games. Seems like the committee values overall wins and that seems our best path to the dance


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners



That’s just what IU had.... a mediocre non conference schedule. #188 in the country. Maybe part of the reason they didn’t get in.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
34 minutes ago, HinnyHoosier said:

 


Speaking of...

The "committee" (emoji849.png) should come out with their criteria before the season starts. And maybe they do. But I find it ridiculous that only after the tournament selection is complete is when anyone finally hears, "Oh, well this year they/we really focused on number of wins vs quality/SOS, etc." Teams have a right to schedule to their benefit. I guess they did somewhat provide an inkling of what they are looking for this year with the Quad ranks and such, but to then hear the bubble was essentially determined quantity of wins makes that whole system seem like a complete waste of time.





Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Transparency??? No way... not from our beloved NCAA.

Posted



That’s just what IU had.... a mediocre non conference schedule. #188 in the country. Maybe part of the reason they didn’t get in.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

There were some solid games (@Dook, Marquette, Uof6, @Ark, and Butler) but we need to eliminate those terrible low majors from the schedule. The 5 solid games we played were comparable to others who had a better noncon SOS but we had too many sub 200 opponents.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
12 hours ago, LIHoosier said:

We played Gavitt the last 2 years; @ Seton Hall (2017), Marquette (2018) so its likely we won't be playing that. When's the last time IU was in a Thanksgiving tournament in some random tropical land or on a cruise ship? 

I've been wondering this too. There are like 74 holiday tournaments. How are never involved in any of them? Granted, many are not that desirable but between the Preseason NIT, the Maui, the one in the bahamas, puerto rico, Vegas, more that I can't think of right now....do we specifically avoid these? It would be a great opportunity for quality wins. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

I’m almost certain we are going to Maui in 2020. I remember it being announced last time we were there. 

I thought so, too, but couldn't find anything after a quick search.

Posted

There were some solid games (@Dook, Marquette, Uof6, @Ark, and Butler) but we need to eliminate those terrible low majors from the schedule. The 5 solid games we played were comparable to others who had a better noncon SOS but we had too many sub 200 opponents.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app


According to the NCAA “NET” Rankings IU’s Non Con schedule

Chicago St- 353
Central Arkansas- 297
Jacksonville- 289
UC Davis- 247
Montana St- 246
UT Arlington- 161
Arkansas- 65
Butler- 64
Marquette- 28
UofL- 22
Duke- 3

IU needs to come some of that dead weight off



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
Would prefer mediocre out of conference games. Seems like the committee values overall wins and that seems our best path to the dance


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners
You got it. Playing the hard games gets you nothing. Plus we will get duke or north carolina in the challenge anyway ans that will be a loss.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
On 3/28/2019 at 11:59 AM, BlueDevil2aHoosier said:

 


According to the NCAA “NET” Rankings IU’s Non Con schedule

Chicago St- 353
Central Arkansas- 297
Jacksonville- 289
UC Davis- 247
Montana St- 246
UT Arlington- 161
Arkansas- 65
Butler- 64
Marquette- 28
UofL- 22
Duke- 3

IU needs to come some of that dead weight off



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Give me 200 and below. Go big or go home.

Posted
On 3/28/2019 at 11:59 AM, BlueDevil2aHoosier said:

 


According to the NCAA “NET” Rankings IU’s Non Con schedule

Chicago St- 353
Central Arkansas- 297
Jacksonville- 289
UC Davis- 247
Montana St- 246
UT Arlington- 161
Arkansas- 65
Butler- 64
Marquette- 28
UofL- 22
Duke- 3

IU needs to come some of that dead weight off



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

Agreed trade the last 5 for teams in the 180-200 range. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...