Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Sadly I 100% agree and that notion worries me, unless Smith figures a lot of things out.

Trying to find a silver lining --  maybe he has.  With his play and his father's tweets it seemed almost a given to me that he would not be on the roster this season and yet here he is.  Hopefully, for everyone's sake he has figured things out because if he has and if Jerome is fully cleared to play, we could actually be looking at an exciting year.  2 big 'ifs' but.............!

Posted

And so the preseason hype begins...

I’m as optimistic as anyone but I just can’t get as pumped as I typically do. There’s too many questions to be answered.

- can Phin stay healthy and have a frosh to soph jump
- can Green be consistently solid and LEAD?
- can we get solid play from back court back ups in Durham, Anderson, or Franklin
- is Hunter healthy and able to contribute as part of a “big 3”
- is Smith past is give a damn inconsistencies, will Archie replace him if not
- can Jackson-Davis, Brunk, or Davis be able to help and recover
- can we get solid play from our bench in the front court

I would love Stuhoo’s lineup but I just don’t see it. Unfortunately, I see us staying small again to start the season.

- Phin
- Green
- Durham
- Smith
- Jackson-Davis

I wouldn’t even mind a lineup of
- Phin
- Green
- Hunter
- Smith
- Jackson-Davis


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Posted
40 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Smith played the least of any starter. And would have played less had Morgan stayed out of foul trouble. 

Archie was not going to play Jake over Smith since it was clear Jake wasn’t going to be on the team much longer. 

What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Jake transferred because he couldn't get playing time over an inefficient Smith.  Had Archie benched Smith and given opportunity to Jake, he may have stayed.  This is why I say Archie seemed unwilling to bench Smith when he did have options 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Josh said:

What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Jake transferred because he couldn't get playing time over an inefficient Smith.  Had Archie benched Smith and given opportunity to Jake, he may have stayed.  This is why I say Archie seemed unwilling to bench Smith when he did have options 

Well insiders have stated he didn’t know the offense till December. So yeah I think his days were numbered. Plus you can’t exactly reward players who don’t learn the offense. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Well insiders have stated he didn’t know the offense till December. So yeah I think his days were numbered. Plus you can’t exactly reward players who don’t learn the offense. 

Did Smith have a grip on it?  He was mostly ineffective and a detriment.  

Posted
1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

I will reward ineffective effort all day before I reward disinterested 

Can't you use one to motivate the other?

I don't see Archie benching Smith this season due to last year's example.  That's all I'm saying.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Josh said:

Can't you use one to motivate the other?

I don't see Archie benching Smith this season due to last year's example.  That's all I'm saying.

He has options now. If there’s different conditions not fair to expect the same results. Smith only played 24 minutes per game Archie was clearly not pleased with him. 

Posted

Smith lacked hustle most times. Forced plays when plays not there. Couldn’t shoot free throws consistently or from anywhere, really. Rarely made cutting plays which should be his trademark. Defense wasn’t as good as his athleticism should allow for.

He was an enigma. He has something like 2 great games randomly.

Before I’m accused of player bashing, it’s not my intention. Honestly rooting hard for him to flip the switch.

I feel like he has a bit of Troy Williams in him but to me Bad Troy was a better player.

So hoping he figures his shot out and if not, which is more predictable, he learns how to use his assets to be a cutter, driver, rebounder and then makes the hustle plays.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Posted
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Smith lacked hustle most times. Forced plays when plays not there. Couldn’t shoot free throws consistently or from anywhere, really. Rarely made cutting plays which should be his trademark. Defense wasn’t as good as his athleticism should allow for.

He was an enigma. He has something like 2 great games randomly.

Before I’m accused of player bashing, it’s not my intention. Honestly rooting hard for him to flip the switch.

I feel like he has a bit of Troy Williams in him but to me Bad Troy was a better player.

So hoping he figures his shot out and if not, which is more predictable, he learns how to use his assets to be a cutter, driver, rebounder and then makes the hustle plays.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

My thoughts exactly

Posted
Can't you use one to motivate the other?
I don't see Archie benching Smith this season due to last year's example.  That's all I'm saying.

I could see it happening. Last year once we got some healthy bodies he benched him. It seemed to work for the team if not so much for JS. Hopefully there were some serious conversations between him and CAM after the season and there’s a better understanding of what is and is not acceptable effort. I think CAM would go that route more quickly this year if those expectations aren’t met.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Last year I said I thought we would struggle because of uncertainty in the post and lack of a trusted floor general.

This year, I think we're looking really quite solid in the post. I'm still not certain about our guard play - a lot hinges on a freshman making strong strides forward as a sophomore and a senior finally realizing his potential.

This over simplifies things, but I'm choosing to only focus on roster makeup as an indicator.

Posted
Smith played the least of any starter. And would have played less had Morgan stayed out of foul trouble. 
Archie was not going to play Jake over Smith since it was clear Jake wasn’t going to be on the team much longer. 

Or was Jake not going to be on the team much longer because he got next to no playing time when others were playing like they gave zero f’s?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
Not bothering to learn the system will result in that 

He was a freshmen and “the system” according to Archie takes years to learn.

I’ve watched every game and I still don’t have a clue what our system is and I would assume most of the players don’t yet either otherwise we wouldn’t be and NIT team or worse both years


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
Just now, MikeRoberts said:


He was a freshmen and “the system” according to Archie takes years to learn.

I’ve watched every game and I still don’t have a clue what our system is and I would assume most of the players don’t yet either otherwise we wouldn’t be and NIT team or worse both years


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Phinisee learned it. He didn’t learn it to the expectation. I love how many people want Archie to reward that with minutes. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...