Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

WayneFleekHoosier

2018 General Recruiting Thread

Recommended Posts

Defense wasn't our issue against Syracuse. Nor do I think was length. I think that game fell solely on coaching. When you aren't even attempting to get the ball to the top of the key it doesn't matter how big we were/weren't against a zone. Then when we do we have Zeller driving into the teeth of that zone. I agree you can't teach size. I think it affords advantages. So does athleticism, being a "dawg", and intelligence. I think all 4 equally can provide a perfect player. Too much emphasis on one will create many issues elsewhere.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Agree coaching was a huge problem there but we were overwhelmed by their length. That team was particularly long and we were particularly unprepared to make up for that. Players were in shock.

The UL losses were more about straight athleticism and intimidation.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Defense wasn't our issue against Syracuse. Nor do I think was length. I think that game fell solely on coaching. When you aren't even attempting to get the ball to the top of the key it doesn't matter how big we were/weren't against a zone. Then when we do we have Zeller driving into the teeth of that zone. I agree you can't teach size. I think it affords advantages. So does athleticism, being a "dawg", and intelligence. I think all 4 equally can provide a perfect player. Too much emphasis on one will create many issues elsewhere.
 
 
Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Good post. I think our normal offense that year was especially ineffective as our guards couldn't space and get open looks on the perimeter. We didn't really have a plan B. Even Zeller had issues that year against long armed bigs. Who was that Big for Minnesota that always ate Zellers lunch?

It was a really terrible matchup for our team but Crean did us no favors.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree coaching was a huge problem there but we were overwhelmed by their length. That team was particularly long and we were particularly unprepared to make up for that. Players were in shock.

The UL losses were more about straight athleticism and intimidation.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

They did have a PG that was 6'7". But we never made that zone move. That is coaching 101 on a zone and we never did it. 10 teams did it that year to that team. Yes they were hot, and yes length could have helped, but it probably wouldn't have mattered with our game plan. Only team I can think of that constantly has utilized their size in the interior against us has been Wisky. Guard size? Like you said, Syracuse could have helped. Kentucky guards used their size against us well. UNC guards did in the tournament as well. I am uncertain it is black and white size matters (get all of your minds out of the gutter ), but it most definitely helps if all things are equal. I would never disagree there.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good post. I think our normal offense that year was especially ineffective as our guards couldn't space and get open looks on the perimeter. We didn't really have a plan B. Even Zeller had issues that year against long armed bigs. Who was that Big for Minnesota that always ate Zellers lunch?

It was a really terrible matchup for our team but Crean did us no favors.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Trevor Mbawkwe (sp?)


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, mdn82 said:

Defense wasn't our issue against Syracuse. Nor do I think was length. I think that game fell solely on coaching. When you aren't even attempting to get the ball to the top of the key it doesn't matter how big we were/weren't against a zone. Then when we do we have Zeller driving into the teeth of that zone. I agree you can't teach size. I think it affords advantages. So does athleticism, being a "dawg", and intelligence. I think all 4 equally can provide a perfect player. Too much emphasis on one will create many issues elsewhere.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

I agree that Syracuse debacle was on coaching.  To call that team horrifically prepared would be an insult to horrifically prepared teams; we should've gotten some money back after that disaster.

Length could've helped, but better preparation and knowing how to attack the zone would've led to better looks regardless of length.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Walking Boot of Doom said:

I don't get all the discussion regarding RP's height. We just finished watching a 5'10" PG cement his legacy as one of the better individual players to come through Indiana. Makes no sense to me

I don't get the height discussion anymore either. RP is a legit 6'1" according to Rabjohns. It seems like once a narrative gets started it won't go away. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Timing as well. We were the hottest team between mid Jan and the end of Feb when we won at MSU. Had the tournament occurred then we were at our peak. We beat Michigan and MSU twice and won at OSU, all teams ranked very high that year.

After MSU we go 5-4 our last 9 games. Such a collapse even before Syracuse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Hoosier Guy said:

I hate discussing this game. Words can't describe how pissed I was. It was absolutely on coaching. That's when I saw the light

Words can't describe how horrendous Crean's coaching job was there.  You couldn't do a worse job of preparation if you were actually trying to do worse.  It was comical, mind-blowing incompetence on his part.

That team was running on fumes going into March and barely scraped by Temple, and an injury to Hulls didn't help.  I still say that Temple game shows how much Hulls meant to that team, his leaving with injury and later returning were turning points in IU's play that game.  I hadn't given up on Crean yet, but it was a bright neon warning sign surround by flashing red arrows; I completely gave up when he managed to bumble his way into missing the NIT with two burger boys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Words can't describe how horrendous Crean's coaching job was there.  You couldn't do a worse job of preparation if you were actually trying to do worse.  It was comical, mind-blowing incompetence on his part.
That team was running on fumes going into March and barely scraped by Temple, and an injury to Hulls didn't help.  I still say that Temple game shows how much Hulls meant to that team, his leaving with injury and later returning were turning points in IU's play that game.  I hadn't given up on Crean yet, but it was a bright neon warning sign surround by flashing red arrows; I completely gave up when he managed to bumble his way into missing the NIT with two burger boys.

I gave up on Crean earlier at Illinois.With game in hand we platoon while going zone against a team who's only strength was shooting.Up double digits and down just as many before he reacted.
I never expected much out of him after that.

Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Woodson1980 said:


I gave up on Crean earlier at Illinois.With game in hand we platoon while going zone against a team who's only strength was shooting.Up double digits and down just as many before he reacted.
I never expected much out of him after that.

Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile app
 

The year before against Nebraska is when Crean lost me. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gave up on Crean earlier at Illinois.With game in hand we platoon while going zone against a team who's only strength was shooting.Up double digits and down just as many before he reacted.
I never expected much out of him after that.

Sent from my LGL41C using BtownBanners mobile app


I agree, he lost me this season. I noticed his substitution patterns were costing the team leads, and chances to put games away. Then Illinois and Syracuse happened

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×