Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

First C-USA and now the Pac-12.  Does 2 constitute a trend?

Pac-12 considering conference scheduling change for 18-19 season

https://frshoopz.com/cbb/pac-12-considering-conference-scheduling-change-for-18-19-season/

http://sunbeltsports.org/news/2018/6/4/mbball-sun-belt-conference-announces-strategic-mens-basketball-plan.aspx

how about 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Brass Cannon said:

If everybody does this wont it just negate the intent?

Exactly. "Mega conferences" are stupid. Let's have 20 teams in the same conference....and then not even play each other.

Here's a great idea, why not have teams that are in the same geographic region play each other regularly? How innovative is that concept?!

We knew conference expansion jumped the shark when West Virginia joined the Big XII....to get it back to 10 teams. West Virginia doesn't even border a state that borders a state in the Big 12. Ridiculous. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Hardwood83 said:

Exactly. "Mega conferences" are stupid. Let's have 20 teams in the same conference....and then not even play each other.

Here's a great idea, why not have teams that are in the same geographic region play each other regularly? How innovative is that concept?!

We knew conference expansion jumped the shark when West Virginia joined the Big XII....to get it back to 10 teams. West Virginia doesn't even border a state that borders a state in the Big 12. Ridiculous. 

 

I've suggested this scenario several time relative to this discussion:

Use the football divisions... 14 teams in 2 divisions, 7 teams each.

Play each team in your division twice - home and away (12 games)

Play each team in the other division once, alternating home and away each year (7 games)

The two division winners play each other for the league championship, automatic tournament bid and trash the money-grabbing B1G tournament, altogether.

Now you have a 19 game conference schedule and everyone plays a balanced schedule... it really doesn't seem that difficult to me. 

Similarly, the NCAA could simply add an additional weekend to the NCAA tournament and include 256 teams... many problems solved...And, yeah, I get it, the 257th team would be pissed to not make the tournament, but who really cares... if you're 257 out of 300+, does it really matter?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

I've suggested this scenario several time relative to this discussion:

Use the football divisions... 14 teams in 2 divisions, 7 teams each.

Play each team in your division twice - home and away (12 games)

Play each team in the other division once, alternating home and away each year (7 games)

The two division winners play each other for the league championship, automatic tournament bid and trash the money-grabbing B1G tournament, altogether.

Now you have a 19 game conference schedule and everyone plays a balanced schedule... it really doesn't seem that difficult to me. 

Similarly, the NCAA could simply add an additional weekend to the NCAA tournament and include 256 teams... many problems solved...And, yeah, I get it, the 257th team would be pissed to not make the tournament, but who really cares... if you're 257 out of 300+, does it really matter?

 

These new conference schedulers aren't looking for a balanced schedule, they are looking for, essentially, the top 4 teams to not play the bottom 4 teams and the top 4 teams to all play the top 4 teams.

I'd be fine with an every team makes the tourney format. It used to work perfectly in Indiana, before the 'everyone gets a trophy' crowd showed up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

would really lessen the meaning of the regular season though.

It would destroy the regular season, also the other postseason tourneys should be completely done with at that point. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, KingPG21 said:

It would destroy the regular season, also the other postseason tourneys should be completely done with at that point. 

How about your top 64 (current without play-in) teams host the regional with themselves, and 3 other teams with teams from each tier?

That would give value to the regular season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×