iu eyedoc Posted April 29 Posted April 29 3 hours ago, Scotty R said: No I said I hate the system and college athletes shouldn't be paid. I could handle it if it was actually NIL rather than pay for pay through the collectives So you just want some sham job to pay them an exorbitant salary so you can pretend that they are playing for the school for the love of the university or go back to the exploitative indentured servitude that the NCAA and university imposed upon student athletes while raking in billions. You find it more just that some athletes had a hard time paying for clothes or trips home or even food so that the schools could just pocket that extra $10M they earn off the athletes? Big changes are needed, but the old system was far more unjust. Spoiler: Little Chinese kids don't make your clothes for $1.27 a day for the love of the company either. cybergates, Home Jersey, steubenhoosier and 4 others 7 Quote
Popular Post JaybobHoosier Posted April 29 Popular Post Posted April 29 30 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said: https://x.com/theportalreport/status/1916859174014603664?s=46 I like the makeup of this roster. A lot of shooting, a lot of heart, and a lot of hustle. J34, Hardwood83, MemphisHoosier and 5 others 8 Quote
Hardwood83 Posted April 29 Posted April 29 10 minutes ago, JaybobHoosier said: I like the makeup of this roster. A lot of shooting, a lot of heart, and a lot of hustle. Agreed, if we could add Harris then say Scott from Louisville and Curtis as a developmental bench piece there aren't a lot of obvious holes. JaybobHoosier and mike vannice 2 Quote
Scotty R Posted April 29 Posted April 29 18 minutes ago, iu eyedoc said: So you just want some sham job to pay them an exorbitant salary so you can pretend that they are playing for the school for the love of the university or go back to the exploitative indentured servitude that the NCAA and university imposed upon student athletes while raking in billions. You find it more just that some athletes had a hard time paying for clothes or trips home or even food so that the schools could just pocket that extra $10M they earn off the athletes? Big changes are needed, but the old system was far more unjust. Spoiler: Little Chinese kids don't make your clothes for $1.27 a day for the love of the company either. I never bought that players had any trouble paying anything in college. They would had to totally blow their money to not have money to live off. They get around 1500 for housing so you get a couple of roommates then keep the rest for spending. Also your scholarship covered housing as well and that money goes to the student if not living in the dorm. It also provides money for food and if you don't take the meal plan then that money goes to the student. My daughter was on a full ride to IU and a Pell grant and she received enough money at the start of the semester to pay for her apartment and all of her bills. Home Jersey, raorIU and jonz44 1 2 Quote
Popular Post AH1971 Posted April 29 Popular Post Posted April 29 5 minutes ago, Scotty R said: I never bought that players had any trouble paying anything in college. They would had to totally blow their money to not have money to live off. They get around 1500 for housing so you get a couple of roommates then keep the rest for spending. Also your scholarship covered housing as well and that money goes to the student if not living in the dorm. It also provides money for food and if you don't take the meal plan then that money goes to the student. My daughter was on a full ride to IU and a Pell grant and she received enough money at the start of the semester to pay for her apartment and all of her bills. So making ends meet? The NCAA had a 20-30 year head start just as TV contracts were growing astronomically larger with each renewal to come up with a solution that compensated their athletes beyond simply “making ends meet”…and they sat on their hands and did nothing. They left it up to the courts to rule that their “amateur” model violated anti-trust laws. College sports are the way they are today because of the NCAA. Nobody else to blame but themselves. Pagoda, Scotty R, steubenhoosier and 5 others 6 1 1 Quote
PartyintheVillas Posted April 29 Posted April 29 5 minutes ago, Scotty R said: I never bought that players had any trouble paying anything in college. They would had to totally blow their money to not have money to live off. They get around 1500 for housing so you get a couple of roommates then keep the rest for spending. Also your scholarship covered housing as well and that money goes to the student if not living in the dorm. It also provides money for food and if you don't take the meal plan then that money goes to the student. My daughter was on a full ride to IU and a Pell grant and she received enough money at the start of the semester to pay for her apartment and all of her bills. Why should they have to live that way when people want to give them millions of dollars? moyemayhem, go iu bb, raorIU and 5 others 6 1 1 Quote
Hoosierfanyuh Posted April 29 Posted April 29 Harris is a take Miller and Fedx2 both asking for ridiculous NIL more than just Indiana is talking to Leo Curtis cybergates, JaybobHoosier, dwtaylor1055 and 4 others 4 3 Quote
Dave from Dayton Posted April 29 Posted April 29 21 minutes ago, PartyintheVillas said: Why should they have to live that way when people want to give them millions of dollars? The top of the Power 5 conferences may have gazillions to throw at 500 ballers. And the rest of the crowd of athletes from less advantaged universities get a trickle. Kind of like those millionaires that are born with a silver spoon in their mouths. They are entitled and 'deserve' it. The rest of us may struggle getting a living wage. And certainly those with disadvantages get less. But hey...that's it. The NCAA definitely blew it. But the NCAA is the power universities who were in charge. Somehow, someway...there has to be a sense of fairness or of morals or...social empathy. I used to be rather conservative. But the older I get...the more...I want to listen and respond with empathy. OGIUAndy, BannerVille, raorIU and 1 other 4 Quote
JustWinBaby Posted April 29 Posted April 29 4 hours ago, Scotty R said: We shouldn't be paying them because they aren't worth paying all this money to them. The individual players aren't what sells but the Universities name. The old system was way more than fair and now they are ruining college sports While I agree the way things currently stand is extremely flawed, it's ridiculous to presume that the basketball programs on their own are the only draw for fans. I guarantee you that the excess millions of eyeballs watching Cooper Flagg this year had little to do with the name on his jersey. And while not everyone is Cooper Flagg, the point still remains that each player that contributes to his team's success is a part of the program in his own right and is a draw for the fans. Players like TJD, Yogi, Zeller, Oladipo, etc., led Indiana to successful seasons and brought a lot more positive attention to the program. It is worth investing in players who are capable of playing winning basketball that makes Indiana a household name again. Indiana used to be one of the top 2 or 3 names in college basketball because it produced players like Steve Alford, Calbert Cheaney, Kent Benson, etc., and of course we had a legendary coach but the players and their hard work and talent is what won us basketball games. Knight orchestrated it of course, but he didn't put the ball through the hoop. To act like the product of the players' labor has no monetary value is truly insane and is a very weak argument against paying players. It's one thing to dislike the current system. I don't like it either and I think that the current NIL fund arms race is problematic and is leading to players getting way overvalued. But that doesn't mean the players don't deserve compensation for what they do. Without them there'd be no on-court product. Fans wouldn't show up to watch an empty court. raorIU and Dave from Dayton 2 Quote
Hurryin' Hoosiers Posted April 29 Posted April 29 7 minutes ago, JustWinBaby said: While I agree the way things currently stand is extremely flawed, it's ridiculous to presume that the basketball programs on their own are the only draw for fans. I guarantee you that the excess millions of eyeballs watching Cooper Flagg this year had little to do with the name on his jersey. And while not everyone is Cooper Flagg, the point still remains that each player that contributes to his team's success is a part of the program in his own right and is a draw for the fans. Players like TJD, Yogi, Zeller, Oladipo, etc., led Indiana to successful seasons and brought a lot more positive attention to the program. It is worth investing in players who are capable of playing winning basketball that makes Indiana a household name again. Indiana used to be one of the top 2 or 3 names in college basketball because it produced players like Steve Alford, Calbert Cheaney, Kent Benson, etc., and of course we had a legendary coach but the players and their hard work and talent is what won us basketball games. Knight orchestrated it of course, but he didn't put the ball through the hoop. To act like the product of the players' labor has no monetary value is truly insane and is a very weak argument against paying players. It's one thing to dislike the current system. I don't like it either and I think that the current NIL fund arms race is problematic and is leading to players getting way overvalued. But that doesn't mean the players don't deserve compensation for what they do. Without them there'd be no on-court product. Fans wouldn't show up to watch an empty court. Most fans wouldn't show up if their jersey didn't say Indiana or insert college name. Look at attendance for minor league teams like mad ants and that is what you would get for college teams if they were detached from the school BannerVille, Scotty R and Hardwood83 3 Quote
PartyintheVillas Posted April 29 Posted April 29 56 minutes ago, Dave from Dayton said: The top of the Power 5 conferences may have gazillions to throw at 500 ballers. And the rest of the crowd of athletes from less advantaged universities get a trickle. Kind of like those millionaires that are born with a silver spoon in their mouths. They are entitled and 'deserve' it. The rest of us may struggle getting a living wage. And certainly those with disadvantages get less. But hey...that's it. The NCAA definitely blew it. But the NCAA is the power universities who were in charge. Somehow, someway...there has to be a sense of fairness or of morals or...social empathy. I used to be rather conservative. But the older I get...the more...I want to listen and respond with empathy. So people shouldn't be allowed to make over a million dollars because not everyone can? You are allowed to be a fan of those poor mid-majors who aren't getting paid millions (or being watched by millions.) No one is stopping you but yourself. Quote
Popular Post ebridges24 Posted April 29 Popular Post Posted April 29 Can someone please create an NIL thread Henryville Hoosier, Home Jersey, AZ Hoosier and 16 others 18 1 Quote
Popular Post Hoosierfanyuh Posted April 29 Popular Post Posted April 29 Trilly posting a gif for Harris tomorrow morning alluding to him being a Hoosier, nice long term pick up Ryno6284, dwtaylor1055, Jwalk83 and 12 others 15 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted April 29 Posted April 29 Trilly posting a gif for Harris tomorrow morning alluding to him being a Hoosier, nice long term pick up Interesting roster as a top 10 Nil program. Big money apparently with DeVries, Wilkerson, Bailey. Didn’t “overspend”. 6’10, 6’8, 6’8. I’m assuming our last guy will be 6’9+ gosh forbid a Bailey injury. Lots of guys who haven’t won in college. I like the emphasis on shooting. Curious to see if his scouting pays off on the unheralded guys. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app Home Jersey, Hornsby and RaceToTheTop 3 Quote
CSP Posted April 29 Posted April 29 24 minutes ago, Hoosierfanyuh said: Trilly posting a gif for Harris tomorrow morning alluding to him being a Hoosier, nice long term pick up Why doesn't he post it now? Quote
Hoosierfanyuh Posted April 29 Posted April 29 3 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said: Why doesn't he post it now? Idk lol Quote
Hoosierfanyuh Posted April 29 Posted April 29 14 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Interesting roster as a top 10 Nil program. Big money apparently with DeVries, Wilkerson, Bailey. Didn’t “overspend”. 6’10, 6’8, 6’8. I’m assuming our last guy will be 6’9+ gosh forbid a Bailey injury. Lots of guys who haven’t won in college. I like the emphasis on shooting. Curious to see if his scouting pays off on the unheralded guys. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app Still looking for an additional shot blocker but I get your point. Kinda felt like the portal wasn’t as great as the last few years too Quote
JustWinBaby Posted April 29 Posted April 29 1 hour ago, Hurryin' Hoosiers said: Most fans wouldn't show up if their jersey didn't say Indiana or insert college name. Look at attendance for minor league teams like mad ants and that is what you would get for college teams if they were detached from the school I never argued that the program isn't relevant to the equation. I'm saying that the argument that the players ARE irrelevant to the equation is a silly position to hold. Rico, iu eyedoc, go iu bb and 1 other 4 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted April 29 Posted April 29 Still looking for an additional shot blocker but I get your point. Kinda felt like the portal wasn’t as great as the last few years too The best guys were going for 2-4 million this cycle. We only spent top for 1 guy. Lots of “names” out there, we just didn’t really want to get into bidding wars for them despite the money. Team chemistry will be better. Coaching will be better. “Talent”. Let’s see. Hope we are finally the team that identifies the talent first. Just such a very odd off season from start to finish. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app Dave from Dayton 1 Quote
Hoosierfanyuh Posted April 29 Posted April 29 5 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: The best guys were going for 2-4 million this cycle. We only spent top for 1 guy. Lots of “names” out there, we just didn’t really want to get into bidding wars for them despite the money. Team chemistry will be better. Coaching will be better. “Talent”. Let’s see. Hope we are finally the team that identifies the talent first. Just such a very odd off season from start to finish. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app Yeah definitely. All things considered I am encouraged though. Rabby made some subtle comments on how much had to be done in so little time tonight Home Jersey and JaybobHoosier 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.