Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

By the same token he also wasn't out there to avoid scoring.  I like what he did and feel his minutes were deserved but there were times when his not even looking at the basket hurt.

Don't think he was avoiding it. But he was never going to force it. Wasn't his role.

Posted
1 hour ago, ebridges24 said:

had many beagles as a kid, they all loved to bark

Had many beagles growing up as my Dad was a rabbit hunter. Anyway, one of my sisters accidentally left a cage unhooked and one ran away never to be found.. I give her crap about stuff we did as kids, but never that... losing a dog hurts regardless...

Posted
1 hour ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

I’m not a Goode fan, but I dislike him a lot less than I dislike Leal. Goode played 3 years at a good program, played 20 mpg on an elite 8 team, and then joined the mess that was Mike Woodson’s basketball program. He probably didn’t know what he was getting himself into. Leal has been at IU for 5 unremarkable years. We have plenty of other guards. If you’re keeping one of them, keep Goode and then get a big with the other spot. 

I like Goode and hope he gets another year. Leal…don’t feel the same and don’t want anymore run it back bs. Goode needs to work on his handle and penetration game along with defense and Leal needs to work on selling Btown real estate.

Posted
38 minutes ago, hoosierbgh said:

Leal certainly makes for a good Rorschach Test. Some look at his career and see an average to above player that was used poorly. Others have a much firmer connection to reality. 

All joking aside, I can't recall any other IU player that was so acclaimed by so many and has generated so much debate with so little apparent accomplishment to base it on. Every year it seems fans have a player or two we misunderstand, it’s been kind of nice to have Leal as one we misunderstand in a positive way for once. 

Our best year during his tenure was when he played in 11 games and 2 mpg. 

Posted

I am hoping Leal wins but only plays 5 or so games. That will allow him to participate in his third senior night, then receive a 7th year from the NCAA (because he only played in 5 games) followed by his fourth senior night. A record that might never be broken.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Mopladysman said:

Isnt it strange you guys are criticizing Woodson for "ruining" Leal when Leal himself said he was the coach he would trust beyond any other?  

Haven't seen this much

3 minutes ago, IUGRAD06 said:

Our best year during his tenure was when he played in 11 games and 2 mpg. 

and that's basically the role we want him in this year.... 

Posted
9 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

Haven't seen this much

and that's basically the role we want him in this year.... 

I just don’t get bringing him back.  Understand the politics of it but Jesus if he is playing we suck.  I don’t understand the logic of getting a guy that just doesn’t want to get a job over a developmental player.  

Goode I would like back as he played 20 mpg for an elite 8 team and his shooting would be a plus in DeVries system.  

Posted
5 minutes ago, IUGRAD06 said:

I just don’t get bringing him back.  Understand the politics of it but Jesus if he is playing we suck.  I don’t understand the logic of getting a developmental player over a guy that just doesn’t want to get a job.  
 

Goode I would like back as he played 20 mpg for an elite 8 team and his shooting would be a plus in DeVries system.  

Oh. Ok ... I prefer Leal over Goode. 

But, like I said in the last post, every post, 11 games 2min per game... yeah seems about right.

Posted
22 minutes ago, IUGRAD06 said:

Why.  Just want to hear the reason.  I have heard some insanely dumb reasons.  

He complements the rest of the roster better, and he can keep the ball in front of him defensively. He's a more effective cutter, a better passer. 

Anything outside of shooting, he's better to a lot better than Goode, IMO. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Home Jersey said:

Don’t see anybody showering Leal with a bunch of outlandish praise or claiming he’d be a difference maker. Just differences of opinion in how valuable he is as a defender and whether people want him as 12 or 13 on the roster.

I just don’t want to see it as adding a 12 or 13 to the roster. It’s only adding a 12 or 13 to the roster if we can’t land someone better than the 1-11 we currently have. Ideally we’d add a 7 or 8 (or better, of course). And if we’re not adding a 7 or 8, I’d rather add a freshman 12 or 13 who could develop into a 1-8 rather than a sixth year senior one. 

Posted
Just now, Hoosierfan2017 said:

I just don’t want to see it as adding a 12 or 13 to the roster. It’s only adding a 12 or 13 to the roster if we can’t land someone better than the 1-11 we currently have. Ideally we’d add a 7 or 8 (or better, of course). 

That’s a fair take for sure.

Posted

Day 5 of saying.   I really want Goode back.  I’m (Goode) with Leal being back.  He loves Indiana and the Hoosiers and he can contribute if needed. 
 

However as I’ve said all offseason, I felt like this roster needed 1 more splash and/or big depth and not getting that stinks.  Nothing against Leal, because it could have been anyone else’s spot. 
 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

He complements the rest of the roster better, and he can keep the ball in front of him defensively. He's a more effective cutter, a better passer. 

Anything outside of shooting, he's better to a lot better than Goode, IMO. 

He turns the ball over way more than he creates assists.  6% differential there.  Goode may not pass well but he doesn’t turn it over at an high percentage.  Offensively he is a train wreck.  Passes on jumpers.  Scared to shoot.  Can’t have that on offense.  
 

Reed and Alexis will be more on cuts than our guards.  He isn’t a catch or shoot or a come off screen guard.  Essentially he is useless on offense.  Kid is a 12th or 13th bench player on a good team while Goode will most likely see the rotation most likely as a backup.  

Posted
45 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Day 5 of saying.   I really want Goode back.  I’m (Goode) with Leal being back.  He loves Indiana and the Hoosiers and he can contribute if needed. 
 

However as I’ve said all offseason, I felt like this roster needed 1 more splash and/or big depth and not getting that stinks.  Nothing against Leal, because it could have been anyone else’s spot. 
 

I agree 100% was hoping for a splash or another big. I just checked 4 different mock drafts and none of them had Neoklis Avdalis going in the first 2 rounds. Maybe there is enough NIL left to lure him to Bloomington. Now that would be a SPLASH.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...