Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

Unless you can get an Isaiah Wong level combo guard, he’s going to be the PG next year. Pack is 41-60 as a starter while being a lead guard.

Conwell was our best chance of that.  MAYBE Rodney Rice.  Not too many in the portal that fit that description that are proven.  Gotta pull one in or find an unheralded one. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

Unless you can get an Isaiah Wong level combo guard, he’s going to be the PG next year. Pack is 41-60 as a starter while being a lead guard.

You didn't answer my question 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

You didn't answer my question 

I’ve answered your questions several times. No, he’s not a winning player lol. 
 

He’s 31-48 as a P5 conference starter. If that’s the guy you want running your offense….well, you get what you deserve.

Posted
6 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Conwell was our best chance of that.  MAYBE Rodney Rice.  Not too many in the portal that fit that description that are proven.  Gotta pull one in or find an unheralded one. 

Or get kind of lucky like he did with Small. Small was the 8th best portal PG last year and seemed to outplay that

Posted
4 minutes ago, 8bucks said:

Or get kind of lucky like he did with Small. Small was the 8th best portal PG last year and seemed to outplay that

What if he was rated wrong? 

His JR year at OKST..  15p 5r 4a in the B12 should have been viewed better. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

I’ve answered your questions several times. No, he’s not a winning player lol. 
 

He’s 31-48 as a P5 conference starter. If that’s the guy you want running your offense….well, you get what you deserve.

His advanced metrics, especially before last season when he apparently played hurt, seem to contradict your assessment of him.

Posted
8 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

I’ve answered your questions several times. No, he’s not a winning player lol. 
 

He’s 31-48 as a P5 conference starter. If that’s the guy you want running your offense….well, you get what you deserve.

You didnt, but.. a high level 3pt shot and 4+ assts doesn't contribute to winning. Got it. 

Posted
Just now, IUHoosierJoe said:

His advanced metrics, especially before last season when he apparently played hurt, seem to contradict your assessment of him.

31-48 is 31-48. Spin it however you’d like. K-State was good before Pack arrived and immediately became good again after he left. Miami went to **** after everybody but Pack left. Those are intangibles I prefer my PG to not have.

Posted
35 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Buckle up. Rice is another one who was crap at IU (albeit with little to no coaching), only to go to another B1G school and stick it to us twice a year...

Geronimooooooooooooooo

Posted
1 minute ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

You didnt, but.. a high level 3pt shot and 4+ assts doesn't contribute to winning. Got it. 

All those fancy numbers yet teams he’s played for are collectively almost 20 games below .500 in conference over a 4.5 year stretch?

Thanks again for playing.

Posted
Just now, AH1971 said:

All those fancy numbers yet teams he’s played for are collectively almost 20 games below .500 in conference over a 4.5 year stretch?

Thanks again for playing.

You don't like guards with F4 experience, odd stance, my guy. 

If Pack is your 4th/5th best player, you have a chance to go to a F4. Have fun refuting that fact. 

Posted
Just now, Chris007 said:

Let’s get excited about Lamar Wilkerson. Hopefully he’s next. 

Huuuuge . Hugeee if true. 

Do you have reason to believe he might be? 

Posted
Just now, AH1971 said:

All those fancy numbers yet teams he’s played for are collectively almost 20 games below .500 in conference over a 4.5 year stretch?

Thanks again for playing.

It's possible for good players to play on bad teams.  Calbert Cheaney's high school team, for example, has a losing record one of his seasons there, among many other examples that exist.  Not surprisingly, you have provided no evidence why I should blame Pack's team records solely on him.  So without that evidence, I'll stick with DeVries' assessment and the fancy numbers you don't understand.  And thank YOU for playing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...