They “Retired” Coach Woodson Thread

[CrossboneIU22]

Question for someone who might know the answer.  Does the board have to approve a firing of an employee?    I understand that they approve all hires, but I'm just talking about the firing of an employee?  Seems to me, the president/AD would have control over if they can fire people or not without board approval.

[Chris007]

5 minutes ago, IUc2016 said:

Some guy on Peegs is raising hell that Quinn's influence in this is unethical given his relationship to woody and position on the BOT. He is trying all he can to get it out there. 

Tend to agree with him.

I think in most cases if someone on the board was that close to the person that is being hired or fired or given a raise they would excuse themselves from the conversation. Quinn should absolutely not be in the room when Woodson is being discussed. 

[Chris007]

Just now, CrossboneIU22 said:

Question for someone who might know the answer.  Does the board have to approve a firing of an employee?    I understand that they approve all hires, but I'm just talking about the firing of an employee?  Seems to me, the president/AD would have control over if they can fire people or not without board approval.

I was under the impression that the buyout had to be voted on by the board. Or maybe it's Pearl's buyout that has to be voted on. I know it has to do with the buyout that involves the board.

[reconmkd]

2 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Are you saying that we aren't there yet?

 

[Hornsby]

So the buyout isn't as daunting as we thought. 
The only thing keeping Woody here is Quinn Buckner? Surely there has to be a way around that. 

I doubt money was ever an issue. We have a quinn issue.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[Hornsby]

Let's say Dolson wants to make a change (sure seems like it). Would the other BoT's be inclined to think it a terrible idea to have a HC remain that the AD won't support 100%? I mean I know he'd have to give lip service but everyone would know that Woddy isn't who Dolson wants. That can't be a good dynamic and I wonder if that'd be enough to sway the vote.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Next year's dynamic would be beyond awful and toxic big time. At that point this could only end very ugly especially for Woodson.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[Rico]

1 minute ago, Hornsby said:

I doubt money was ever an issue. We have a quinn issue.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

[Artie86]

12 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I think in most cases if someone on the board was that close to the person that is being hired or fired or given a raise they would excuse themselves from the conversation. Quinn should absolutely not be in the room when Woodson is being discussed. 

[Tasmanian Devil]

13 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

They are taking their stance from Rabby or even the AD's office. 

Mark my words: this is going to get extremely UGLY before it’s over.

[IUFAN1976]

26 minutes ago, Rico said:

Wrong Buckner, lol!  I guess that will teach me to be more specific 

[Hornsby]

I don't know... one could argue that he's united the fan base... on the "Fire Woodson" side... but, hey, united is united...

Exactly.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[IUFAN1976]

Just now, Tasmanian Devil said:

Mark my words: this is going to get extremely UGLY before it’s over.

I told you there might be kicking and screaming!!! Lol

[JSHoosier]

1 minute ago, Tasmanian Devil said:

Mark my words: this is going to get extremely UGLY before it’s over.

Going to? If we're seeing an effort to turn public perception against Woodson to influence Buckner then it's already ugly.

[Hornsby]

I told you there might be kicking and screaming!!! Lol

Safe to say Woodson is not going to leave gracefully

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

[Tasmanian Devil]

Just now, IUFAN1976 said:

I told you there might be kicking and screaming!!! Lol

Maybe even weeping and gnashing of TEETH.

After all,  this is Indiana - NOT Kentucky.

[go iu bb]

1 hour ago, Kentuckysucks said:

Let's all hope tomorrow goes something like this 

.

 

Man, that game was brutal. But I also cared more then than I do now. A lot more.

1 hour ago, Chris007 said:

And that game didn't get any better after halftime either

I think they only lost the second half by 24 points instead of 26. They lost by exactly 50, right?

[Crazy about IU]

One thing that seems clear is Dolson wants Woodson out. With all that’s going on he has not came out with a public statement in support of Woodson. I feel he will be let go on two conditions. 
1. IU doesn’t go on a big run to finish the season.

2. They can get a new coach most would be excited for.

[IUFAN1976]

16 minutes ago, Chris007 said:

I think in most cases if someone on the board was that close to the person that is being hired or fired or given a raise they would excuse themselves from the conversation. Quinn should absolutely not be in the room when Woodson is being discussed. 

Exactly, it’s a conflict of interest!  It’s like an auditor auditing their own work 

[cleeter]

20 minutes ago, AZ Hoosier said:

I don't know... one could argue that he's united the fan base... on the "Fire Woodson" side... but, hey, united is united...

It's like the difference between Manchester United and Sheffield United (hopefully you watch the Premier League or this reference isn't going to make a lick of sense)

[Tasmanian Devil]

1 minute ago, JSHoosier said:

Going to? If we're seeing an effort to turn public perception against Woodson to influence Buckner then it's already ugly.

Without question it’s ugly right now.

But it’s nothing like it’s going to be on Sunday if Woody still in line to be back next year. We could be talking about some serious blowup in Assembly Hall.
.