Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

JaybobHoosier

General Coach Candidate News

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Hoosier DaDa said:

I have 30 pages to catch up on and I don’t think I have it in me this time. I’m going to jump a head. I’m assuming 1555 to 1585 is more of the same fun stuff with really no new info.  If there is would someone please be a gem and give me the cliff notes?

IMG_5601.png

You will miss out on some fascinating Mark Turgeon info. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, HoosierPapi4 said:

We should calm down before we get a masshole 2 comment.lol If he’s coming we won’t know for a while so let’s get back on topic…Mark Turgeon 

Honestly I would welcome it so we could definitively put an end to the Stevens chapter once and for all. Until we get something more direct, or smoke starts to leak that Dolson has been told no by him, there will always be a glimmer of hope regardless of how small. 
 

I truly believe what we are seeing is that Dolson has not been told no, or if he has, he has kept it really close to the vest (which would make very little sense not to want leaked imo). Because of this none of our insiders have heard anything to corroborate the Goodman quote and have almost to a person remained in at least the ‘maybe’ category for BS. 
 

None of that is to say I think the chances of him actually coaching here are very high, but until something clearly shows he’s out and we’ve moved on it is difficult for me to not at least wonder if it’s happening. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, HoosierSadaseci said:

With that said I think we will end up with a good coach...though it doesn't take much to find an improvement over Woodson...

And it is so sad that the bar has sunk this low that we'd hire Red Klotz if he were still alive because he'd be a better coach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

All of this silence may have a perfectly straightforward explanation:

  • We have started the coaching search in earnest.
  • We have retained a search firm.
  • We are speaking with agents/representatives/candidates. 
  • In doing so, there are invariably numerous people at IU that will need access to this information: lawyers, athletic department staff, IT people, and more.
  • Therefore, there has been an official need to have people sign an attestation that if they are in the information loop, they will keep that information confidential, under penalty of employment loss or civil action should they violate the agreed-upon confidentiality.

That would be the appropriate, professional way to proceed. That does not exclude any candidate, but it also does not signify any candidate.

 

 

Logic and reason? How dare you? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

All of this silence may have a perfectly straightforward explanation:

  • We have started the coaching search in earnest.
  • We have retained a search firm.
  • We are speaking with agents/representatives/candidates. 
  • In doing so, there are invariably numerous people at IU that will need access to this information: lawyers, athletic department staff, IT people, and more.
  • Therefore, there has been an official need to have people sign an attestation that if they are in the information loop, they will keep that information confidential, under penalty of employment loss or civil action should they violate the agreed-upon confidentiality.

That would be the appropriate, professional way to proceed. That does not exclude any candidate, but it also does not signify any candidate.

 

 

Logic is a buzz kill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

 

All of this silence may have a perfectly straightforward explanation:

  • We have started the coaching search in earnest.
  • We have retained a search firm.
  • We are speaking with agents/representatives/candidates. 
  • In doing so, there are invariably numerous people at IU that will need access to this information: lawyers, athletic department staff, IT people, and more.
  • Therefore, there has been an official need to have people sign an attestation that if they are in the information loop, they will keep that information confidential, under penalty of employment loss or civil action should they violate the agreed-upon confidentiality.

That would be the appropriate, professional way to proceed. That does not exclude any candidate, but it also does not signify any candidate.

 

 

Why are so many people close to the situation saying Scott has his guy if he just started his search

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×