Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

IUc2016

NCAA MBB Transfer Portal

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, TeeterInNJ said:

100% true story

I sat next to Jeremiah April and Tim Priller on the first day of Psych 101. We introduced ourselves. 

Jeremiah asked me if I could share my notes with him. Tim told him to take his own. 

I said "You guys are on the basketball team right?" Jeremiah said "Yeah, but if basketball doesn't work out I'm going to move to Colorado and become a Rastafarian." Colorado had just started legal recreational marijuana sales. 

Tim looked mortified, we all awkwardly laughed, and I only sat near them again once all semester. 

I think I'll just excuse myself from the forum until we have a full roster to discuss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not criticism but some things for everyone to keep in mind:

1. Someone posted the #s with walk-ons removed and it was about 20% of scholarship D1 players.

2. Some of those walk-ons will transfer down and get scholarships at lower levels, but the majority may just land…nowhere, at least on a scholarship. For example: I don’t know former IU walk-on Nate Childress but by all accounts he can really play, maybe he gets a master’s paid for and some cash in his pocket. But it’s also possible he just starts a career, or pursues more schooling without any basketball at all.

3. In fact some former scholarship athletes won’t get offers and will end up having made a bad call to leave a scholarship at their former school. That’s a shame. I don’t have the data but I recall there was some analysis last year for FB or BB that indicated a surprising # of players just don’t have a chair when the music stops. (FWIW I think this is probably not a new phenomenon but a new format in which it occurs; some of the Crean recruiting lowlights mentioned in this thread probably experienced a pre-portal version of this.)

4. National college student persistent rate at by institution is ~75%. I can think of reasons the athlete transfer rate would be different in EITHER direction so it’s possible the equilibrium ends up near the standard student rate when the dust settles. (That would INCLUDE students going pro or dropping out in non-persistence.)

All of this is exacerbated by COVID after-effects still for a few reasons:

5. We still have about two more years of student-athletes with extra years for playing during 2020-2021. There’s some roster crunch created by giving everyone an extra year. (IMHO the Pomeroy argument for giving everyone an extra year permanently is a good one, check it out.)

6. As we expected at the time, a couple years of recruiting, evaluating, and developing were impacted by COVID too, and so the school and player hit rate/fit were probably diminished. If so we might logically assume that would lead to marginally more transfers while some of it “shakes out.”

7. Stating the obvious but for revenue sports, the one-time free transfer is very new and so we’re still developing norms. I wouldn’t be shocked if schools, coaches, or even conferences develop reputations, in fact some already have: it’s hard for non-grad transfers to get into Michigan, On3 ran a whole article on how behind PSU was in NIL, Musselman/Arkansas and Underwood/Illinois have taken plenty, etc. This could also lead to fewer transfers in the future as students who want development pick a school/coach/conference that’s strong there, but another set of students go to the highest bidder out of HS, then some of them realize that was not an ideal choice and use the free transfers to land somewhere great at working with trs.

8. Finally, there’s probably an upper limit on the average annual % of players who transfer. The true number will ebb and flow once the extra COVID years evaporate, but if we assume most players now WON’T sit out and will only transfer once unless as grads, and many students will use one (free or grad) but not both. I’d guess we’re actually close to the upper limit now for all the reasons listed above and the % some years hence may be slightly lower many years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, jbeaman9 said:

#1 transfer portal player Kel'el Ware is in Bloomington and will begin his official visit today at noon and it will continue through tomorrow. He will be visiting with Ledlum. Coach Ya leading the charge on this one and has done a "tremendous job" and "Indiana has a legit shot here" per insiders.

I have a really good feeling about Ware...feels like when recruits kind of come out of nowhere that's usually a good sign. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, jbeaman9 said:

#1 transfer portal player Kel'el Ware is in Bloomington and will begin his official visit today at noon and it will continue through tomorrow. He will be visiting with Ledlum. Coach Ya leading the charge on this one and has done a "tremendous job" and "Indiana has a legit shot here" per insiders.

XJ, Galloway, Ledlum, Reneau, Ware would be an interesting starting lineup.  
 

I don’t think we’d see the style of play many are hoping for. But there’s a decent amount of talent there and quite a bit of size. I might have concerns about our perimeter defense again but I suspect it would be better than last year. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, str8baller said:

XJ, Galloway, Ledlum, Reneau, Ware would be an interesting starting lineup.  
 

I don’t think we’d see the style of play many are hoping for. But there’s a decent amount of talent there and quite a bit of size. I might have concerns about our perimeter defense again but I suspect it would be better than last year. 

Hope they add Knecht or another wing. Curious if they see Ledlum as a 3 or 4. Really would like for Malik to start. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Loaded Chicken Sandwich said:

Oddly enough... I actually liked Hoetzel. He definitely would have been better off on the 12 or 13 team or even the 16 team. Him, Hanner and Which Hand? Stan transferred out... Then we win the B1G. But I do think Hoetzel could have thrived more the year after. He was definitely a good shooter. Oddly enough, he was probably a better shooter than anyone SDSU had on the team this year.

Ended up playing overseas for quite a while.  Last played in 2021.

Of course he's Max Montana now...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, lillurk said:

Not criticism but some things for everyone to keep in mind:

1. Someone posted the #s with walk-ons removed and it was about 20% of scholarship D1 players.

2. Some of those walk-ons will transfer down and get scholarships at lower levels, but the majority may just land…nowhere, at least on a scholarship. For example: I don’t know former IU walk-on Nate Childress but by all accounts he can really play, maybe he gets a master’s paid for and some cash in his pocket. But it’s also possible he just starts a career, or pursues more schooling without any basketball at all.

3. In fact some former scholarship athletes won’t get offers and will end up having made a bad call to leave a scholarship at their former school. That’s a shame. I don’t have the data but I recall there was some analysis last year for FB or BB that indicated a surprising # of players just don’t have a chair when the music stops. (FWIW I think this is probably not a new phenomenon but a new format in which it occurs; some of the Crean recruiting lowlights mentioned in this thread probably experienced a pre-portal version of this.)

4. National college student persistent rate at by institution is ~75%. I can think of reasons the athlete transfer rate would be different in EITHER direction so it’s possible the equilibrium ends up near the standard student rate when the dust settles. (That would INCLUDE students going pro or dropping out in non-persistence.)

All of this is exacerbated by COVID after-effects still for a few reasons:

5. We still have about two more years of student-athletes with extra years for playing during 2020-2021. There’s some roster crunch created by giving everyone an extra year. (IMHO the Pomeroy argument for giving everyone an extra year permanently is a good one, check it out.)

6. As we expected at the time, a couple years of recruiting, evaluating, and developing were impacted by COVID too, and so the school and player hit rate/fit were probably diminished. If so we might logically assume that would lead to marginally more transfers while some of it “shakes out.”

7. Stating the obvious but for revenue sports, the one-time free transfer is very new and so we’re still developing norms. I wouldn’t be shocked if schools, coaches, or even conferences develop reputations, in fact some already have: it’s hard for non-grad transfers to get into Michigan, On3 ran a whole article on how behind PSU was in NIL, Musselman/Arkansas and Underwood/Illinois have taken plenty, etc. This could also lead to fewer transfers in the future as students who want development pick a school/coach/conference that’s strong there, but another set of students go to the highest bidder out of HS, then some of them realize that was not an ideal choice and use the free transfers to land somewhere great at working with trs.

8. Finally, there’s probably an upper limit on the average annual % of players who transfer. The true number will ebb and flow once the extra COVID years evaporate, but if we assume most players now WON’T sit out and will only transfer once unless as grads, and many students will use one (free or grad) but not both. I’d guess we’re actually close to the upper limit now for all the reasons listed above and the % some years hence may be slightly lower many years.

Great breakdown

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Scotty R said:

This is how I see the next two days playing out. All of us are going to be projecting lineups thinking all 3 of these guys will commit the next few days. Then two hours after the OV are over we all panic when no verbals are announced. 

 

 

Likely scenario 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×