Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

He updates every Friday and Tuesday so his bracket hasn’t updated since IU beat Wisky.   Tomorrows should have them out of his first 4 

Thanks. Makes more sense because he also seemed to indicate that we might only need to win one more which would be a pretty generous projection for us and not anywhere  close to First Four territory. 

Posted
30 minutes ago, J34 said:

Great sets, great adjustments, and great use of timeouts. 

Use of timeouts can't be overstated. Countless times this season I've found myself thinking "we might need a timeout here" and then he calls one. Such a refreshing change after seeing Mike Woodson dozing on the bench, Archie Miller looking nervous and Tom Crean clapping his hands raw. 

Posted
11 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

The movement that Enright generates on the offensive end is truly fantastic.

 

Enright is another that keeps learning how to be better. His push of the ball in the second half was also huge to setting up the offense. The adjustment of inserting Connerway going forward will be so interesting in watching this team get better or take a step back. This is getting pretty fun to watch where the rest of the season plays out! 

Posted
48 minutes ago, IUHoosier5 said:

After the game I saw a bracketologist go through what IU’s seed line would be if they won out, and he had them at a 5/6. Personally, I was thinking 4/5. 

6 would be insane lol 

Posted
7 hours ago, fwgreenway said:

Enright is another that keeps learning how to be better. His push of the ball in the second half was also huge to setting up the offense. The adjustment of inserting Connerway going forward will be so interesting in watching this team get better or take a step back. This is getting pretty fun to watch where the rest of the season plays out! 

Enright has really grown on me over the course of this season. His defense and effort were never in question. But it doesn't feel like we're playing 4 on 5 on offense with him anymore.

Posted
2 hours ago, IUHoosier5 said:

6 seems too low for beating 3 top 12 teams…one of which they would have done so twice. 

If they won out that would mean 2 road wins (NET- 4 and 10) and home win after NET 12. Those would be massive wins add in another road win at NET 39 and they would sky rocket up the seed line.   They will end the year with at least a top 15 sos.  If and that’s a big if they won out they would be no worse then a 5 seed and more then likely a 4.   3 seed line would be out of reach unless they  went very far in the conference tourney 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

If they won out that would mean 2 road wins (NET- 4 and 10) and home win after NET 12. Those would be massive wins add in another road win at NET 39 and they would sky rocket up the seed line.   They will end the year with at least a top 15 sos.  If and that’s a big if they won out they would be no worse then a 5 seed and more then likely a 4.   3 seed line would be out of reach unless they  went very far in the conference tourney 

You are the most-in-the-know bracketologist on here, so I love hearing what you think. Thank you! I tend to agree! 

Posted
6 hours ago, IUHoosier5 said:

6 seems too low for beating 3 top 12 teams…one of which they would have done so twice. 

And how recent it would have all been. It would also include two of them on the road. 

I dont really know, when talking "top 4 wins" only.. how many teams in the country would have 4 better. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...