Transfer Portal w IU Interest

[Hoosier DaDa]

20 hours ago, Chris007 said:

Just not my cupps of tea. He and his people pushed his own agenda. The only thing I ever heard was that he wasn't the greatest with other students. But nothing team-wise. 

So Cupps (no pun ;)   and Gallo was hated by the students??  And the students had to put up with Gallo for 5 years. 

[Demo]

Just now, Uspshoosier said:

https://x.com/insidethehall/status/1905276230976311511?s=46

There you go with your damned reasonableness again. 

[go iu bb]

1 hour ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

I don't think Luke should win, tbh. He knew the rules. 

You should have just said in the first place that you just didn't want him to win. Your opinion, however, does not have an effect on the chances he would win a lawsuit against the NCAA. His chances of winning are very high, so high that the NCAA will probably grant him another year to avoid a lawsuit.

[RaceToTheTop]

3 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

You should have just said in the first place that you just didn't want him to win. Your opinion, however, does not have an effect on the chances he would win a lawsuit against the NCAA. His chances of winning are very high, so high that the NCAA will probably grant him another year to avoid a lawsuit.

To this point, no one that fits Goode's profile -- playing ten games in the second half of a season -- has been granted a redshirt.  Saying his chances are 'very high' is a false narrative.  Marcus Domask had a stronger case that Goode did and hired lawyers as well.  Didn't get an extra year.

[CSP]

5 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

You should have just said in the first place that you just didn't want him to win. Your opinion, however, does not have an effect on the chances he would win a lawsuit against the NCAA. His chances of winning are very high, so high that the NCAA will probably grant him another year to avoid a lawsuit.

That wasn't my opinion though? I said I don't think he should/will. I want him to win. 

All year, even this week, lotssss of posts have stated he won't get an extra year... now all of a sudden it's morphed into he will, without a doubt, get an extra year or the NCAA will be sued. Not buying it. 

[Dave from Dayton]

Posters are complaining about the NCAA rules, and compliance.  Wondering about who is to blame for the NCAA decisions and compliance.  Is it true that we...the universities...are actually the decision makers?  If that really is the case, is it true that our universities are to blame?  (I have seen the enemy...they are us.)

From the browser and AI, I get this: 

The NCAA's highest governing body, the Board of Governors, primarily composed of university presidents and chancellors, makes key decisions, while the NCAA President, currently Charlie Baker, leads the national office and provides counsel to governance leaders. 

 

Here's a more detailed breakdown of the NCAA's decision-making structure:

• NCAA Board of Governors:

  This body, consisting of university presidents, chancellors, and independent members, provides strategic planning for the Association, adopts policies, resolves core issues, initiates and settles litigation, and provides final approval and oversight of the NCAA's budget. 

   
• NCAA President (Charlie Baker):

  The NCAA President leads the national office staff, provides counsel to key governance leaders within the NCAA membership, and serves as an ex officio member of the Board of Governors, with a vote only to break ties. 

   
• Divisions and Councils:

  The NCAA is structured into three divisions (I, II, and III), each with its own council and committees responsible for setting rules and operating guidelines. 

   
• Association-Wide Committees:

  These committees, comprising representatives from all three divisions, make recommendations that can impact the entire Association, such as those related to health and safety, fairness, and expanded opportunities for student-athletes. 

   
• National Office Staff:

  The NCAA's national office in Indianapolis provides support to the governance structure, acting as guides, liaisons, researchers, and managing public and media relations

[CSP]

32 minutes ago, Demo said:

There you go with your damned reasonableness again. 

Can we couple that with when DDV and WVU started having commits roll in? 

[go iu bb]

2 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

That wasn't my opinion though? I said I don't think he should/will. I want him to win. 

All year, even this week, lotssss of posts have stated he won't get an extra year... now all of a sudden it's morphed into he will, without a doubt, get an extra year or the NCAA will be sued. Not buying it. 

You did not say "should/will." You literally said "I don't think Luke should win" which is an opinion. If you meant "will" you should have used that instead.

[CSP]

https://x.com/AssemblyCall/status/1905278534928458020?t=EJ98VrT40G5sXvn7DdqP9g&s=19

 

[go iu bb]

9 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

To this point, no one that fits Goode's profile -- playing ten games in the second half of a season -- has been granted a redshirt.  Saying his chances are 'very high' is a false narrative.  Marcus Domask had a stronger case that Goode did and hired lawyers as well.  Didn't get an extra year.

Did Domask actually sue? I really think the NCAA would lose if it went to court.

Edit: he also played 10 out of 26 games. I'm not sure how that is a stronger case. Luke is under the 30% threshold just at the wrong time of year. Domask was over that threshold. So they would be making different arguments.

[CSP]

4 minutes ago, go iu bb said:

You did not say "should/will." You literally said "I don't think Luke should win" which is an opinion. If you meant "will" you should have used that instead.

I didn't realize that wanting Goode to win his appeal needed to be explained. 

[newcastle12]

28 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

To this point, no one that fits Goode's profile -- playing ten games in the second half of a season -- has been granted a redshirt.  Saying his chances are 'very high' is a false narrative.  Marcus Domask had a stronger case that Goode did and hired lawyers as well.  Didn't get an extra year.

It's granted all the time in football.  The time you play your 4 games does not matter.  The time you play the 10 will not matter to the court.  

[AH1971]

34 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

To this point, no one that fits Goode's profile -- playing ten games in the second half of a season -- has been granted a redshirt.  Saying his chances are 'very high' is a false narrative.  Marcus Domask had a stronger case that Goode did and hired lawyers as well.  Didn't get an extra year.

No he didn't lol. Marcus Domask had played 4 full years of college basketball and tried to get a 6th year. Luke Goode has played 3 and 1/3 seasons. 

[RaceToTheTop]

Just now, AH1971 said:

No he didn't lol. Marcus Domask had played 4 full years of college basketball and tried to get a 6th year. Luke Goode has played 3 and 1/3 seasons. 

20-21 didn’t count for anyone.

name me one player who played 10 games in February and March who received a redshirt.

[RaceToTheTop]

8 minutes ago, newcastle12 said:

It's granted all the time in football.  The time you play your 4 games does not matter.  The time you play the 10 will not matter to the court.  

Again, cite any example of a basketball player who played 10 games in February and March who has won his appeal.   I would love for Goode to be the first but saying he has a good chance to do something no one else has done is a false narrative.

[AH1971]

2 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

20-21 didn’t count for anyone.

name me one player who played 10 games in February and March who received a redshirt.

He still played 4 full seasons and eclipsed the 30% threshold in the one season he didn't play. I don't know names of specific players, maybe this will be further known as the Luke Goode rule once he's granted a medical waiver. 

[Hoosier DaDa]

19 hours ago, mdiu28 said:

I think they overpaid 

Grossly 

[PartyintheVillas]

1 hour ago, go iu bb said:

Did Domask actually sue? I really think the NCAA would lose if it went to court.

Edit: he also played 10 out of 26 games. I'm not sure how that is a stronger case. Luke is under the 30% threshold just at the wrong time of year. Domask was over that threshold. So they would be making different arguments.

The fact it is enforced differently across sports is going to hurt the NCAA's case big time.

[HoosierHoopster]

2 minutes ago, PartyintheVillas said:

The fact it is enforced differently across sports is going to hurt the NCAA's case big time.

NCAA

No. Clue. About. Anything

[newcastle12]

2 hours ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Again, cite any example of a basketball player who played 10 games in February and March who has won his appeal.   I would love for Goode to be the first but saying he has a good chance to do something no one else has done is a false narrative.

Name one that's went go court.   The court isn't going to side with them on this and Goode plans to go to court not just threaten with a lawyer. The NCAA has taken how many Ls the last two years?