Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, IUHoosierJoe said:

At best, we’ll get in as a 10 or 11 seed and get our doors blown off by somebody like Georgia in our first game.  I doubt that would be seen as success.

It might be by the admin - the people in control. There's absolutely no trust in the administration to do what needs to be done. Rooting for IU to lose/not make the tourney is heartbreaking but if there's even a .00001% chance of him staying with a tourney birth, I can't get excited after wins. Just can't.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said:

Just getting in by our chiny chin chin and losing a 1st or 2nd round game isn’t success; however, this team does have the talent to go farther than that and most don’t want to see that based on what I posted above 

For a guy who's "done [my] job", getting in IS success. Don't feed the parasite.

Posted
15 minutes ago, ap2345 said:

People struggle to believe a move will be made if he has any tournament success 

Oh, I get it. 
The argument I don’t buy into is that the IU administration is going to screw things up based on past mistakes.

Different regime. Different circumstances.

Faith is a fleeting concept here.

Posted
2 hours ago, IUHAHN81 said:

We know damn well the "killer instinct" they supposedly had going into the OSU game and the fight Mike had in him to live to see another day will all be worn off and they're gonna go right back to who they really are come Wednesday. Beyond predictable.

Exactly because I said it earlier, a leopard doesn’t change their spots and old habits are hard to break.  It takes 21 days to develop a habit, that is why them playing hard won’t be sustainable 

Posted
2 minutes ago, steubenhoosier said:

Oh, I get it. 
The argument I don’t buy into is that the IU administration is going to screw things up based on past mistakes.

Different regime. Different circumstances.

Faith is a fleeting concept here.

The best predictor of future action is past, relevant action.

I hope that the administration does the necessary deed, but there ain't no guarantee in this thing.

Posted

Woodson should be gone after the season or before. To get another year he would need a big ten championship or a elite 8. We fired crean for not getting past sweet 16 so woodson is done even if he makes the tournament. I believe we won't get close to making the tournament. I predict it gets ugly starting Wednesday

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Posted
2 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said:

Exactly because I said it earlier, a leopard doesn’t change their spots and old habits are hard to break.  It takes 21 days to develop a habit, that is why them playing hard won’t be sustainable 

They also say it takes 10,000 repetitions to perfect something.

This thread is at 33,000+ posts .

Taking away the positive posts from a few, including myself for a while, we have perfected the concept of Woodson needs to go.

Posted
20 minutes ago, IUHoosierJoe said:

At best, we’ll get in as a 10 or 11 seed and get our doors blown off by somebody like Georgia in our first game.  I doubt that would be seen as success.

I was just saying why some people would almost rather see the team lose as opposed to win and make the tournament 

Posted
3 hours ago, Papacap said:

And I hope you’re right. I truly do. I’m just tired of IU accepting average results. 
Before I retired, if I had a person reporting to me with Woodson’s record, he’d be fired. Not even a question. In fact, I would have been gone if it didn’t make a change. And we are talking about positions that made maybe $200k. Good money but not what Woodson is making. But IU fans are supposed to take it. I truly hope we make a change. But the fact that we accept what is being put out for this kinda money is amazing to me. 

Be honest, though. You never would've hired someone with Woodson's background for such a prominant or high-paying position in the first place, so you never would've been forced to fire him. It's still baffling that IU hired someone with zero college coaching experience to run their flagship athletic position and paid him millions of dollars to do it. 

And to make matters worse, he hadn't even been a head coach in the pros for years...

Posted
I think the fear is a tournament birth gives him another year.  
That just should not be. If so the standards of coaching here are dramatically lower and we should apologize and just hire crean back immediately. We're supposed to be contending for big 10 and ncaa championships. Not just getting in

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Posted
That just should not be. If so the standards of coaching here are dramatically lower and we should apologize and just hire crean back immediately. We're supposed to be contending for big 10 and ncaa championships. Not just getting in

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk


Have you seen the IU basketball program over the past 30 years? There’s been a lot of stuff here that should not have ever been.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Posted
33 minutes ago, Silat Player said:

Be honest, though. You never would've hired someone with Woodson's background for such a prominant or high-paying position in the first place, so you never would've been forced to fire him. It's still baffling that IU hired someone with zero college coaching experience to run their flagship athletic position and paid him millions of dollars to do it. 

And to make matters worse, he hadn't even been a head coach in the pros for years...

Agree. But what’s baffling to me is how some people say IU fans are being too harsh. No. IU is being too soft. It’s truly amazing. If IU moves on from Woodson this year great. And for those who are 100% confident, I wish I could be also. But IU has screwed the pooch too many years to give confidence. I’ll believe it when it’s official.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...