Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, dwtaylor1055 said:

ALOT QUIETER THAN WARE.

I think less enthusiasm is part of that equation.  But also he has and still has his other visit set up.  
 

imo, we must feel pretty good as it seemed to be a Battle/Ledlum battle and we didn’t try to keep working on Battle, or so it seems. 
 

i guess you could also project that Knecht even though we have space for both could be the Ledlum replacement option.  

Posted
1 minute ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I think less enthusiasm is part of that equation.  But also he has and still has his other visit set up.  
 

imo, we must feel pretty good as it seemed to be a Battle/Ledlum battle and we didn’t try to keep working on Battle, or so it seems. 
 

i guess you could also project that Knecht even though we have space for both could be the Ledlum replacement option.  

fair.  Would be nice to get a majority of our openings locked up so we can shift focus to our one last spot and to the 24 class and further out

Posted
4 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I think less enthusiasm is part of that equation.  But also he has and still has his other visit set up.  
 

imo, we must feel pretty good as it seemed to be a Battle/Ledlum battle and we didn’t try to keep working on Battle, or so it seems. 
 

i guess you could also project that Knecht even though we have space for both could be the Ledlum replacement option.  

I'M ENTHUSIASTIC!

Ledlum pleeeeease!

Posted
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

I think less enthusiasm is part of that equation.  But also he has and still has his other visit set up.  
 

imo, we must feel pretty good as it seemed to be a Battle/Ledlum battle and we didn’t try to keep working on Battle, or so it seems. 
 

i guess you could also project that Knecht even though we have space for both could be the Ledlum replacement option.  

We might have taught ourselves a lesson with the Ware fiasco too?
Tomorrow will be an excellent day...

Posted
19 minutes ago, HoosierAloha said:

We might have taught ourselves a lesson with the Ware fiasco too?
Tomorrow will be an excellent day...

I like Ledlum, don't get me wrong.  I think he'll be a Hoosier too but recruiting 6'6'' guys are a dime a dozen compared to 7 foot rim protectors.  Then Ware is also kinda a statement recruitment that Indiana is serious about its goals.  Generates buzz.  Maybe overhyped but buzz is good for programs.  

Posted
23 minutes ago, BGleas said:

There is buzz and there's winning. If they're both at IU, I'd bet Ledlum has a bigger impact on IU winning game than Ware. 

Ware wins you the offseason, I'd bet Ledlum wins you more games in-season. 

Leadership and locker room matters a whole lot more than many give it credit for.

Winning games is not primarily an effort to accumulate highly ranked talent.

Posted
Just now, JSHoosier said:

I saw On3 has a Chrystal ball pick for Ledlum to IU, didn't see who it was though.

I think it was from one of their more prominent guys, but don't hold me to that. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...