Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

Bigger win in Dayton that night? IU winning first ncaa tournament game in 6 years or me keeping a straight face when his family told me Woody wasn’t using him right and not giving him enough  chances to  shine.  Just nodding my head and mouth shut as Parker preceded to foul a 3 point shooter late in the game and not getting yanked.   Interesting game watching experience for sure  

Not enough chances to shine? They started him every game AND played his music before games for crying out loud! What more could they want!?

Posted
5 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

He stood around and shot open 3s whenever he wanted, and missed a lot of them.  He didn’t do anything else (he competed hard on D). If that was by design, it was hard to watch.  Geronimo deserved more minutes down the stretch and they should have come from Kopp/Stewart. 

Yep. Woody called his number in crunch time twice down the stretch (Rutgers and at Purdue). The staff gave him opportunities

Posted
6 minutes ago, IUc2016 said:

Yep. Woody called his number in crunch time twice down the stretch (Rutgers and at Purdue). The staff gave him opportunities

He finally hit an important one against Rutgers by the simple mathematical approach of taking 20 and having to hit one of them. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Uspshoosier said:

Bigger win in Dayton that night? IU winning first ncaa tournament game in 6 years or me keeping a straight face when his family told me Woody wasn’t using him right and not giving him enough  chances to  shine.  Just nodding my head and mouth shut as Parker preceded to foul a 3 point shooter late in the game and not getting yanked.   Interesting game watching experience for sure  

Did they forget that they ran 3 straight plays to get him open for 3's at the end of the Rutgers game.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

He finally hit an important one against Rutgers by the simple mathematical approach of taking 20 and having to hit one of them. 

He was 2-9 from three in that game. 
 

he hit 2 more threes the rest of the way (6 more games). Not good for your best 3pt shooter who was given a green light 

Posted
16 minutes ago, IUc2016 said:

He was 2-9 from three in that game. 
 

he hit 2 more threes the rest of the way (6 more games). Not good for your best 3pt shooter who was given a green light 

6 or 7 of those attempts had to have been in the last couple minutes. He got great look after great look and clanked them all. 

Posted

And we’re not even talking about a seasoned Big 1.o vet like Kopp whose shot selection was nonexistent.

We lacked top end makers but our shot selection was turrble.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Posted
7 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

Parker Stewart was also a key figure in both of the disciplinary incidents of the last year.

He was a terrible addition to last year’s team.

I'm not all sad that he transferred. I think this is an addition by subtraction in his case.

Outgoing are 3 mid-major players. One of those, Stewart, seemed to have attitude issues. 

Incoming to replace those players are 2 top 30 recruits, another in the top 100, and a 3 star. So far, these 4 players seen like good guys and are willing to work. 

Posted
Woody asked who he thinks will make the biggest jump. First words out of Woody's mouth: "I like Tamar Bates...I'm looking for big things from him."
Also: "Based upon what I've seen, I would like to play ten guys if I could."

He definitely wants to play 10. If that is best for the team or not remains a question. Please, no Hockey sub patterns/Platoons.
I feel like NBA guys like to have a more set sub pattern based on the clock. I really prefer no preset subs and just go by the feel of the game and the players and how they are playing, who is hot and cold. Who is exploiting matchups, etc.

I understand the thought of practicing groups together but I hope he fully abandons that idea. I’ve said a million times by now, the best teams seem to be playing 7-8 by the end of the year, even really deep teams. Which we could work ourselves towards if players separate from a 10 man rotation.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
3 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

."

Also: "Based upon what I've seen, I would like to play ten guys if I could."

Often a good thing, but it can sometimes mean nobody is really standing out. The latter reminds me of the breathless reports of Guy-Michael-“whatever his name was” tearing it up in practice. It turns out the guys he was practicing against weren’t very good and neither was he.  Hopefully it’s the former and there’s too much bona fide talent to get on the floor. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...