Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, MikeRoberts said:

It’s 1 AAU program and honestly if I was a player  and my AAU coach wouldn’t let me go to IU if I wanted to I would be pissed or tell them to F off. 

It’s not like the AAU coach could actually stop them from coming to IU. They might talk bad about IU, but if Drew was taking IU to conference championships and deep tournament runs they’re not going to be able to keep kids away. I think the AAU stuff is really overblown, personally. 

Posted
6 minutes ago, Kentuckysucks said:

Hiring a 68 year old would avoid the coaching carousel? 

Hiring a 68 year old who WILL win, will avoid the carousel.  If he stayed until he was 75, like a Boeheim, Coach K, etc are right now,  then that would make IU a very attractive job for the next coach.  Right now, apparently we're considered a lateral move, we're hoping someone chooses us, and who is to say that our next coach (young or old) will last 10 years.  The names we are all talking about are a gamble right now.  

Posted
Just now, jumpshot53 said:

Hiring a 68 year old who WILL win, will avoid the carousel.  If he stayed until he was 75, like a Boeheim, Coach K, etc are right now,  then that would make IU a very attractive job for the next coach.  Right now, apparently we're considered a lateral move, we're hoping someone chooses us, and who is to say that our next coach (young or old) will last 10 years.  The names we are all talking about are a gamble right now.  

Yup, a lateral move, that likely pays very well. And we still don't seem to be able to lock down any of our top tier guys from non-blue blood programs... 

Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, Southside said:

Bama has always been FB first, but the SEC in general is starting to take BB more seriously now that KY is vulnerable. Also, Bama is likely preparing for the days post-Saban, and know they need to pay a bit more attention to BB. Bama has some huge boosters too, so it's not like they don't have money to compete in both FB and BB donor stuff.

Tks, Looks to me like there sure targeted a great coach for their first up and comer! 

Would love for us to somehow get him.

Edited by ronzo4IU
Posted
7 minutes ago, HoosierFan1994 said:

Just curious- where does this search rank as far as the past ones? If I remember right four years ago it was quiet. Many of the media suspected Alford until him saying he wasn't coming to IU. Donovan was the pipe dream. Archie wasn't really a surprise as he was a top 5 guy for most. In 2008 Crean was up there after Bennett turned the job down. 

There were a lot more leaks. A lot of people wanted Crean when we hired Sampson. I remember back when RMK was fired. I discovered Peegs back then because I just had to know. Everyone was just sure that Pitino was coming. He was the BS of that search. When we hired Crean, people were just absolutely sure that Izzo was unhappy at MSU and ready to come to Bloomington. We’re nothing if not consistent in our delusions.

Posted

I’ve watched video interviews of Mike Lewis and I would not want him as a head coach.
He seems to have a similar personality as CAM.  
He might be OK for a small school somewhere but not here IMO.

Posted
1 minute ago, FrenchConnection said:

There were a lot more leaks. A lot of people wanted Crean when we hired Sampson. I remember back when RMK was fired. I discovered Peegs back then because I just had to know. Everyone was just sure that Pitino was coming. He was the BS of that search. When we hired Crean, people were just absolutely sure that Izzo was unhappy at MSU and ready to come to Bloomington. We’re nothing if not consistent in our delusions.

Well, there was a time when IU was a can’t turn down destination. We could have had Calipari, Pitino etc. IU has killed itself with internal BS and making poor hires

Posted
5 minutes ago, Southside said:

Yup, a lateral move, that likely pays very well. And we still don't seem to be able to lock down any of our top tier guys from non-blue blood programs... 

There aren’t that many instances of a coach leaving a P5 program at which he was currently successful unless

  • he has historical or personal ties to the destination 
  • the NCAA is about to bring the hammer down
Posted
4 minutes ago, ronzo4IU said:

Tks, Looks to me like there sure targeted a great coach for their first up and comer! 

Would love for us to somehow get him.

Yup, Oat's rise is pretty impressive. 3 MAC tourney championships in 4 years at Buf, and 1 SEC championship and S16 in two years (really only one year since last year was canceled).

 

 

Posted
1 minute ago, FrenchConnection said:

There aren’t that many instances of a coach leaving a P5 program at which he was currently successful unless

  • he has historical or personal ties to the destination 
  • the NCAA is about to bring the hammer down

IDK. Seems like the other "blue bloods" have better luck for whatever reason. I can't buy that it's luck.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Southside said:

Yup, Oat's rise is pretty impressive. 3 MAC tourney championships in 4 years at Buf, and 1 SEC championship and S16 in two years (really only one year since last year was canceled).

 

 

Oats might not leave but I think he is the homerun and while not a popular stance, even more so than Stevens

Posted
Just now, MikeRoberts said:

Oats might not leave but I think he is the homerun and while not a popular stance, even more so than Stevens

I'd take Stevens easily over Oats, but I'd be pretty happy with Oats.

He's only making 2.4. At minimum, he's going to get a raise.

Posted
1 minute ago, Southside said:

IDK. Seems like the other "blue bloods" have better luck for whatever reason. I can't buy that it's luck.

They have better coaching trees. We don’t have a Roy Williams or a Bill Self chomping at the bit to come home. Duke is in a similar spot. All of their former players have flamed out as college coaches and they will be in a bind when K retires.

Posted
3 hours ago, Southside said:

And RMK is still worshipped. Well, except by the woke, holier than thou crowd.

I agree RMK's situation started them on their path. RMK ran a clean program, and his kids went to class though. RMK did have his own brand of discipline though when the kids goofed up. But so did most good coaches back then. He ended up being just too old school and behind in the times in some aspects. The admin just wanted to make sure they got someone "nice" and PC.

And I'm all for running a clean program and following the rules. But I also don't have a problem with ones that push the envelop so long as they are not coloring too far outside the lines.

At least we have good women's BB, and football now.. oh the irony.

You make additional good points, Southside and I agree and personally wouldn’t mind operating in the gray (truthfully all these kids should be getting paid anyway — just my opinion and respect others seeing it differently). 

You mention Knight’s discipline and I think it’s been clear OFF THE COURT DISCIPLINE has been sorely lacking largely since Knight’s departure.

We all have our stories — whether it’s girls or parties, etc. Not saying every player who has come through in the last 20 years is guilty. Far from it. And I don’t blame the players. They are kids wanting to enjoy their college experience. 

Just saying we need a coach who can not only get these guys to play tough D and make open shots, we also need a coach who can keep these “campus rockstars” focused on basketball. 

Not an easy task in Bloomington, IN.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...