Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, AZ Hoosier said:

Understood... but the goal is not to get a 11-13 player, but to get a 5-8 player and then everyone gets bumped back a spot... with the exception of a guy like Leal, what coach is actively recruiting a player projected to fall that low on the depth chart? And then there's the "preferred walk-on" players - that, too, is a special kind of lunacy...

If you try to get all 4 and 4 star players you won't ever use all 13 scholarships.  Most teams don't use all 13 anyways especially teams like UK, Duke and KU or most of the top teams.

Posted
2 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

Agree with your first point completely.

As for your second point? I'm pretty sure that in the 'good old days' when Keith Smart and Dean Garrett parachuted into Bloomington, "developed" three year or more players like Todd Meier, Magnus Pelkowski, Steve Eyl, Kreigh Smith, and Brian Sloan thought to themselves; "Sh!t, I guess I'm not playing much this year after all."  And if the transfer rules didn't require them to sit out a year to play their senior year? It's a reasonable assumption that a few of them would have been gonzo.

Steve Eyl played plenty even after those two came here. The rest of those guys  were pretty much like Leal

Posted
6 minutes ago, Scotty R said:

Steve Eyl played plenty even after those two came here. The rest of those guys  were pretty much like Leal

If I remember right, Kreigh Smith played some and Sloan got on the court because he was willing to screen for shooters.   But they weren’t the caliber of players as Garrett and Smart so they accepted their roles

Posted
4 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said:

If I remember right, Kreigh Smith played some and Sloan got on the court because he was willing to screen for shooters.   But they weren’t the caliber of players as Garrett and Smart so they accepted their roles

Sloan didn't play much until the 88 and 89 seasons. I have watched a little  of the old games from the then and the first only time Smith or Meier came in was at the end of the first half due to foul problems 

Posted
3 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Brian Sloan played more after those two came, not less.

Sloan didn't play much at all in the 86-87 season. It was the next two years that he played the most

Posted
1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Kentucky Insiders convinced Reeves is coming back to UK now as things have changed.

Sounds like Hart or Hold at 12 if that’s the case.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Maybe.  Sounds like Kentucky is trying to form a collective (can't believe they didn't already have one).   But there are suitors out there....Indiana and Illinois among them.  Reeves can bide his time.

Posted
12 hours ago, Josh said:

I believe Purdoo has that term trademarked

Trademark? Don’t know for sure.

But after 3 straight losses to double-digit seeds - including the arguably WORST loss in the history of the NCAA Tournament - they certainly are monopolizing the term. 

Posted
16 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Kentucky Insiders convinced Reeves is coming back to UK now as things have changed.

Sounds like Hart or Hold at 12 if that’s the case.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Yup. Reeves heading back to UK in a crazy turn of events. From what I gathered, Reeves did not want to go back but Cal must’ve backed the Brinks truck up with this “non-collective” collective.

Posted
1 hour ago, BGVille Hoosierfan said:

Yup. Reeves heading back to UK in a crazy turn of events. From what I gathered, Reeves did not want to go back but Cal must’ve backed the Brinks truck up with this “non-collective” collective.

So, are we in the 'roll with what we got' mode now?

Posted
1 hour ago, cthomas said:

So, are we in the 'roll with what we got' mode now?

Over the weekend Hart’s interviews told us a couple things:

1. He liked IU but IU was slow playing him pending other targets, and

2. He planned to decide very soon.

But he hasn’t announced yet, and the two targets everyone presumed IU had above him, Reeves and Wilcher, are now off the board (or were never on it, if the folk telling of the Reeves saga is true).

If he wanted to go to UK or Rutger, I think he’d have committed by now.

Posted
Over the weekend Hart’s interviews told us a couple things:
1. He liked IU but IU was slow playing him pending other targets, and
2. He planned to decide very soon.
But he hasn’t announced yet, and the two targets everyone presumed IU had above him, Reeves and Wilcher, are now off the board (or were never on it, if the folk telling of the Reeves saga is true).
If he wanted to go to UK or Rutger, I think he’d have committed by now.

Reeves drama still continuing from UK side. They are less confident today.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
1 hour ago, TheWatShot said:

Figured we wouldn't get Wilcher or Reeves. It's IU basketball, after all; can't have too many good things happening in the same offseason. 

giphy.gif?cid=6c09b9523f84e21899a0a41f70

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Yeah, I guess getting two burger boys after April just isn't good.

Notice I said can't have "too many" good things happening in the same offseason. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...