Josh Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 2 hours ago, Tasmanian Devil said: 6 freshmen, 2 sophs who have 96 minutes between them. Train wreck waiting to happen. I believe Purdoo has that term trademarked thebigweave, MemphisHoosier, hoosierbgh and 1 other 1 3 Quote
Scotty R Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 2 hours ago, AZ Hoosier said: Understood... but the goal is not to get a 11-13 player, but to get a 5-8 player and then everyone gets bumped back a spot... with the exception of a guy like Leal, what coach is actively recruiting a player projected to fall that low on the depth chart? And then there's the "preferred walk-on" players - that, too, is a special kind of lunacy... If you try to get all 4 and 4 star players you won't ever use all 13 scholarships. Most teams don't use all 13 anyways especially teams like UK, Duke and KU or most of the top teams. Quote
Scotty R Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 2 hours ago, Stuhoo said: Agree with your first point completely. As for your second point? I'm pretty sure that in the 'good old days' when Keith Smart and Dean Garrett parachuted into Bloomington, "developed" three year or more players like Todd Meier, Magnus Pelkowski, Steve Eyl, Kreigh Smith, and Brian Sloan thought to themselves; "Sh!t, I guess I'm not playing much this year after all." And if the transfer rules didn't require them to sit out a year to play their senior year? It's a reasonable assumption that a few of them would have been gonzo. Steve Eyl played plenty even after those two came here. The rest of those guys were pretty much like Leal bird4par 1 Quote
IUFAN1976 Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 6 minutes ago, Scotty R said: Steve Eyl played plenty even after those two came here. The rest of those guys were pretty much like Leal If I remember right, Kreigh Smith played some and Sloan got on the court because he was willing to screen for shooters. But they weren’t the caliber of players as Garrett and Smart so they accepted their roles Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, Scotty R said: Steve Eyl played plenty even after those two came here. The rest of those guys were pretty much like Leal Brian Sloan played more after those two came, not less. Quote
Scotty R Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 4 minutes ago, IUFAN1976 said: If I remember right, Kreigh Smith played some and Sloan got on the court because he was willing to screen for shooters. But they weren’t the caliber of players as Garrett and Smart so they accepted their roles Sloan didn't play much until the 88 and 89 seasons. I have watched a little of the old games from the then and the first only time Smith or Meier came in was at the end of the first half due to foul problems Quote
Scotty R Posted June 12, 2023 Posted June 12, 2023 3 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said: Brian Sloan played more after those two came, not less. Sloan didn't play much at all in the 86-87 season. It was the next two years that he played the most Quote
Alford Bailey Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 Sloan screen #45? Oh wait is he in the transfer portal? lillurk 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 Kentucky Insiders convinced Reeves is coming back to UK now as things have changed. Sounds like Hart or Hold at 12 if that’s the case. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 1 hour ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Kentucky Insiders convinced Reeves is coming back to UK now as things have changed. Sounds like Hart or Hold at 12 if that’s the case. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners Maybe. Sounds like Kentucky is trying to form a collective (can't believe they didn't already have one). But there are suitors out there....Indiana and Illinois among them. Reeves can bide his time. lillurk 1 Quote
Tasmanian Devil Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 12 hours ago, Josh said: I believe Purdoo has that term trademarked Trademark? Don’t know for sure. But after 3 straight losses to double-digit seeds - including the arguably WORST loss in the history of the NCAA Tournament - they certainly are monopolizing the term. Quote
BGVille Hoosierfan Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 16 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Kentucky Insiders convinced Reeves is coming back to UK now as things have changed. Sounds like Hart or Hold at 12 if that’s the case. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners Yup. Reeves heading back to UK in a crazy turn of events. From what I gathered, Reeves did not want to go back but Cal must’ve backed the Brinks truck up with this “non-collective” collective. ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
cthomas Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 1 hour ago, BGVille Hoosierfan said: Yup. Reeves heading back to UK in a crazy turn of events. From what I gathered, Reeves did not want to go back but Cal must’ve backed the Brinks truck up with this “non-collective” collective. So, are we in the 'roll with what we got' mode now? Home Jersey 1 Quote
Home Jersey Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 Bummer if Reeves is really out of the picture. That said, I'm ready to roll with Trey, CJ and Jakai at the 2. Hopefully Newton is healthy and Gunn is ready to go. I am fairly optimistic. Trey has earned the starting spot, I like him next to X. cthomas, Joe_hoopsier and ebridges24 3 Quote
TheWatShot Posted June 13, 2023 Posted June 13, 2023 Figured we wouldn't get Wilcher or Reeves. It's IU basketball, after all; can't have too many good things happening in the same offseason. Scotty R 1 Quote
lillurk Posted June 14, 2023 Posted June 14, 2023 1 hour ago, cthomas said: So, are we in the 'roll with what we got' mode now? Over the weekend Hart’s interviews told us a couple things: 1. He liked IU but IU was slow playing him pending other targets, and 2. He planned to decide very soon. But he hasn’t announced yet, and the two targets everyone presumed IU had above him, Reeves and Wilcher, are now off the board (or were never on it, if the folk telling of the Reeves saga is true). If he wanted to go to UK or Rutger, I think he’d have committed by now. thebigweave 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted June 14, 2023 Posted June 14, 2023 Over the weekend Hart’s interviews told us a couple things: 1. He liked IU but IU was slow playing him pending other targets, and 2. He planned to decide very soon. But he hasn’t announced yet, and the two targets everyone presumed IU had above him, Reeves and Wilcher, are now off the board (or were never on it, if the folk telling of the Reeves saga is true). If he wanted to go to UK or Rutger, I think he’d have committed by now.Reeves drama still continuing from UK side. They are less confident today. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app go iu bb, RaceToTheTop, lillurk and 1 other 4 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted June 14, 2023 Posted June 14, 2023 1 hour ago, TheWatShot said: Figured we wouldn't get Wilcher or Reeves. It's IU basketball, after all; can't have too many good things happening in the same offseason. Yeah, I guess getting two burger boys after April just isn't good. woodenshoemanHoosierfan, J34, Home Jersey and 3 others 3 3 Quote
Stuhoo Posted June 14, 2023 Posted June 14, 2023 1 hour ago, TheWatShot said: Figured we wouldn't get Wilcher or Reeves. It's IU basketball, after all; can't have too many good things happening in the same offseason. Quote
TheWatShot Posted June 14, 2023 Posted June 14, 2023 10 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said: Yeah, I guess getting two burger boys after April just isn't good. Notice I said can't have "too many" good things happening in the same offseason. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.