Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

Transfer Portal w IU Interest

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

I hope we can finally find officiating that doesn't pander to tackle basketball; that would be nice. 

The bald 7ft official needs to GOOOOO

You mean Lurch (aka DJ Carstensen)?  BTW - he's also a self-professed Wisconsin fan.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AH1971 said:

I don't think many are worried about what the 5 brings offensively. Defensively however, it's a glaring concern at the present moment.

Alexis is actually pretty good. From what I’ve seen of DD teams the defense relies less on bigs. They focus on stopping drives before the paint area. This style is so foreign to the big ten. So much length already(not height) that they will get backside help blocks. This bunch looks speedy too. The opposing team better get back on defense. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Victor said:

Not true. Some of you/us aren’t ready to see a team like this one. Need to stop thinking post centric. The B1G is going away from banging and backing down type bigs. Alexis is 240 pound by the way. 

You might be right on the direction of the conference, but no one (that I have seen) is asking for Ballo 2.0. Also notice the guys being discussed for a post are Federiko/Miller, etc, who barely weigh 200lbs, but are athletic. Which is just like most of the Sweet 16 teams this year. I don't happen to think Bailey fits that role.

Wanting to have a legit defender at the 5 doesn't = 'post-centric.'

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Victor said:

The wings he’s getting play more like guards. Will be sweet seeing kick outs to multiple “guards”. Can’t wait to see them vs. fletcher and smith. 

That said, Conerway is a combo guard who can guard wings and rebounds like a wing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Hardwood83 said:

You might be right on the direction of the conference, but no one (that I have seen) is asking for Ballo 2.0. Also notice the guys being discussed for a post are Federiko/Miller, etc, who barely weigh 200lbs, but are athletic. Which is just like most of the Sweet 16 teams this year. I don't happen to think Bailey fits that role.

Wanting to have a legit defender at the 5 doesn't = 'post-centric.'

Bailey is 6'10-6'11 -- -230/235.... and is well above average athletically. Yes he is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

Bailey is 6'10-6'11 -- -230/235.... and is well above average athletically. Yes he is. 

I don't think he is an adequete post defender, regardless of his measurements. I am basing this off my limited observations. Apparently you do based on yours. It's April, so nothing will settle it for several months.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Hardwood83 said:

You might be right on the direction of the conference, but no one (that I have seen) is asking for Ballo 2.0. Also notice the guys being discussed for a post are Federiko/Miller, etc, who barely weigh 200lbs, but are athletic. Which is just like most of the Sweet 16 teams this year. I don't happen to think Bailey fits that role.

Wanting to have a legit defender at the 5 doesn't = 'post-centric.'

Thats not at all what I saw. I see people wanting “bigs”. I took it as they want banger types. This teams built like(imho) the Miami team that nearly won it all. 4 guard and one semi-big on the court who can do many things. I mean if you want to look at the direction look at Wisconsin. Totally different team this year. Gone with the swing offense and traditional pack line. Guard might’ve adapted styles nobody expected and doing it Temu style. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hardwood83 said:

I don't think he is an adequete post defender, regardless of his measurements. I am basing this off my limited observations. Apparently you do based on yours. It's April, so nothing will settle it for several months.  

I don't know how you couldn't be an adequate defender with his measurements. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AH1971 said:

He’s not bad in spurts, but there’s no way he can be your only defensive oriented player in the front court next season. What if he’s only good for 10-15 mpg or god forbid he gets hurt again? Need a rim protector who you can rely on for ~20 mpg, and if it cuts into Reed’s minutes, so be it.

Who said that? I think you missed some of my point though. He’s not going to be the only one. This team will get backside help and blocks from these athletic wings. It’s been done before. Just not in the big ten. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

I don't know how you couldn't be an adequate defender with his measurements. 

Low block rate, bad rebounding rate, poor positioning…likely due to strength. Teams in the A10 scored at the rim at will with Bailey in the game. He’s a perimeter-oriented player that just happens to be tall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Certified Sunshine Pumper said:

Bailey is 6'10-6'11 -- -230/235.... and is well above average athletically. Yes he is. 

I guess everyone thinks blocks/rim protection comes from post players. Just here to poke the bear I guess. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Victor said:

Who said that? I think you missed some of my point though. He’s not going to be the only one. This team will get backside help and blocks from these athletic wings. It’s been done before. Just not in the big ten. 

Do we have athletic wings? We have taller wings, but Miles is the only one who I would consider to be a plus athlete. I don’t think you’re going to get much defensively from DeVries, Dorn, Wilkerson etc.

Maybe they’re serviceable but that’s not reassuring especially if Bailey is playing a bulk of the minutes at the 5.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, AH1971 said:

Low block rate, bad rebounding rate, poor positioning…likely due to strength. Teams in the A10 scored at the rim at will with Bailey in the game. He’s a perimeter-oriented player that just happens to be tall.

You are leaving out the other players though. They were bad defensively at the point of attack etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×