OGIUAndy Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: People don’t like the reality of Indiana basketball around here. It’s easy to set the narrative. It’s not hard to make it clear what your intentions are. For example. Louisville will host Bidunga and Shelstad. That makes a statement regardless of if they get those guys or not. Indiana is doing the opposite of this. It’ not hard to figure out. Plus I’ve got a few X people talk to giving me scoop. What does this mean? Quote
str8baller Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 4 minutes ago, IU Prof said: Well, national reporters listed IU as one of 3 or 4 teams to watch for both players, just today. I'll take their word over Debbie Downer speculation. I’m not getting into any of “who knows inside info and who doesn’t “ around here. But I will only point out one thing: almost all verified national reporters will be pushing out “inside info” that comes from players agents. Most of that info is just agents trying to pump up their players price. It’s the oldest trick in the book and happens every FA season in the pros in every league. That type of reporting is pretty worthless, imo. Ryno6284, Juwan Moye, Jeff Flabjohns and 3 others 6 Quote
Popular Post Stuhoo Posted 19 hours ago Popular Post Posted 19 hours ago Some team is gonna get the highest profile portalizers. I guess that adding Oumar Ballo to IU’s lineup was sweet because of how much he cost, but…………. I’m FAR more interested in seeing if IU wins a lot of games next year. Home Jersey, sirhoosierlot, iu eyedoc and 5 others 7 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, IU Prof said: So when UL strikes out on Bidunga and Shelstad, you'll give them credit for the effort. But if IU hosts a top target and misses, something tells me you won't be so generous. Don’t project what I’ll do. Louisville is telling the world we are big fish spending. I don’t actually think they get either. But I’ll be curious what other targets this attracts for them. IU isn’t big fish spending and that is fine. Or it might be fine. We will see. IU Prof and RaceToTheTop 2 Quote
IU Prof Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: It’s ok. I view myself as a realist. I’ve talked to people I trust. We aren’t getting Juke Harris or Blackwell. We did get the South Alabama kid though if that makes ya feel better. The smart money is always on the field when it comes to landing a particular player. But that doesn't mean IU wasn't involved, or that you have any actual insight. RaceToTheTop 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, Stuhoo said: Some team is gonna get the highest profile portalizers. I guess that adding Oumar Ballo to IU’s lineup was sweet because of how much he cost, but…………. I’m FAR more interested in seeing if IU wins a lot of games next year. Love ya Stu, but this was the mantra last year too. Didn’t work out well. We better get some size, talent, and skill on the roster to manifest wins. Ryno6284 and Stuhoo 1 1 Quote
IU Prof Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, str8baller said: I’m not getting into any of “who knows inside info and who doesn’t “ around here. But I will only point out one thing: almost all verified national reporters will be pushing out “inside info” that comes from players agents. Most of that info is just agents trying to pump up their players price. It’s the oldest trick in the book and happens every FA season in the pros in every league. That type of reporting is pretty worthless, imo. 100%. But I trust their info more than Wayne's "X sources"... Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago (edited) 3 minutes ago, IU Prof said: The smart money is always on the field when it comes to landing a particular player. But that doesn't mean IU wasn't involved, or that you have any actual insight. Ok then. I do. And I’m stating it for fact. We are gonna get some good players. 12-14 million has to spend somewhere. But not Harris or Blackwell. Edited 19 hours ago by WayneFleekHoosier IU Prof 1 Quote
hoopsta007 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 11 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: I’ve talked to people. Harris isn’t a thing. Blackwell isn’t a thing. And Vaaks isn’t a thing. People can be mad at me as the bearer of bad news but that’s why my slant is less optimistic than you all. Who are your people thinking we are getting? Quote
OGIUAndy Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, IU Prof said: 100%. But I trust their info more than Wayne's "X sources"... Are these Twitter folks? And if so, seems like the easiest thing to do would be to just tell us their handles please. Quote
IU Prof Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 3 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Don’t project what I’ll do. Louisville is telling the world we are big fish spending. I don’t actually think they get either. But I’ll be curious what other targets this attracts for them. IU isn’t big fish spending and that is fine. Or it might be fine. We will see. I don't have to project. You have already done it repeatedly, criticizing DDV for failing to land any of the Big fish recruits we went after. But when Louisville does the same, they are showing they're serious... Quote
Stuhoo Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago Just now, WayneFleekHoosier said: Love ya Stu, but this was the mantra last year too. Didn’t work out well. We better get some size, talent, and skill on the roster to manifest wins. 100% -Love ya back and the discussion is spicy and fun! I AGREE… we need to get size, talent, and skill. But $$ spent and high profile acquisitions don’t necessarily equate to those goals; great evaluations and money wisely spent accomplishes that. And if the current staff doesn’t have that skill no bankroll will save them. Henryville Hoosier, 94Bulldog, BtownStrength and 2 others 5 Quote
Home Jersey Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago I will be a little surprised if, other than Olsen, we land more than 2 guys we are currently talking about. Not saying that in a negative way. Just that the portal is chaotic. Could totally build a winning team with guys not currently on the radar. Makes for an interesting offseason. Best time of year for IUBB :/ FortWayneHoosier, go iu bb and Stuhoo 3 Quote
Artie86 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 17 minutes ago, IU Prof said: Unless you work in the AD or are a big donor, no one here has any actual clue what the NIL is. It's all just second hand info. ^^^this! Did ANYONE even expect or see Dolson and President Whitten putting out all that money to put Coach Cignetti at the top of the NCAA pay scale. There is more money or at least the ability to get whatever is needed to pay for what they feel will help and benefit IU athletics. NVFalcons1990 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, hoopsta007 said: Who are your people thinking we are getting? 1 minute ago, hoopsta007 said: Who are your people thinking we are getting? Burton, South Alabama guy. Feel really good about Estella. Not Fru. A scattershot approach on guards. Tons of offers. Not a directed approach. Not the big big names. Not Sherrill, Harris, Blackwell. Ryno6284, hoopsta007, 8bucks and 1 other 4 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Home Jersey said: I will be a little surprised if, other than Olsen, we land more than 2 guys we are currently talking about. Not saying that in a negative way. Just that the portal is chaotic. Could totally build a winning team with guys not currently on the radar. Makes for an interesting offseason. Best time of year for IUBB :/ This is reasonable. SA kid. Burton seems like a high odds addition. After that. Let’s see who wants to spend. Teams are gonna miss target A then pivot. That could cost us guys we think we feel good about. Home Jersey 1 Quote
AH1971 Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 6 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Don’t project what I’ll do. Louisville is telling the world we are big fish spending. I don’t actually think they get either. But I’ll be curious what other targets this attracts for them. IU isn’t big fish spending and that is fine. Or it might be fine. We will see. IU needs a brand new roster, they can’t afford to big fish spend right now and get stuck with no catch. Quote
Asha’man Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 57 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: Burton, South Alabama guy. Feel really good about Estella. Not Fru. A scattershot approach on guards. Tons of offers. Not a directed approach. Not the big big names. Not Sherrill, Harris, Blackwell. Andershock literally said IU is in the top line for Harris at this point. That was less than an hour ago. Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 7 minutes ago, OGIUAndy said: Are these Twitter folks? And if so, seems like the easiest thing to do would be to just tell us their handles please. I’ve got some DMs with a few that have connections. I and they don’t know everything. But they know more than most. Including my guy Lettice. Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted 19 hours ago Posted 19 hours ago 2 minutes ago, AH1971 said: IU needs a brand new roster, they can’t afford to big fish spend right now and get stuck with no catch. Yes, saw that. My peeps say it won’t be Indiana. Maybe the staff will shock the world. Price is gonna be too steep. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.