Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Banksyrules

They “Retired” Coach Woodson Thread

Recommended Posts

Really strange hill to die on defending Beard in the name of wins. 

Nobody is defending him just calling out you guys who are trashing him even though he was never convicted of a crime. He certainly would not want you guys on his jury. Guilty as charged before trial. He would stand no chance regardless of evidence.

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Hornsby said:

Serious question for the holier than thou crowd. If beard is hired will you quit watching and supporting IU out of principle? I would think morally you would have too if what you say holds any water.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

They would have tough choice I’m guessing. Everyone is different in what they view as acceptable or not.   If Wades ever hired I would have a tough choice as to whether to keep being invested in a program I have loved for 46 years or cut bait until someone else is hired.   

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hornsby said:

Nobody is defending him just calling out you guys who are trashing him even though he was never convicted of a crime. He certainly would not want you guys on his jury. Guilty as charged before trial. He would stand no chance regardless of evidence.

 

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

On this we can agree my man! He would not want me on the jury. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Hornsby said:

Nobody is defending him just calling out you guys who are trashing him even though he was never convicted of a crime. He certainly would not want you guys on his jury. Guilty as charged before trial.

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk
 

Lol at thinking the charges were dropped because there was some evidence that exonerated him. Go research domestic violence statistics and look at how many cases go unprosecuted and for what reason. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lol at thinking the charges were dropped because there was some evidence that exonerated him. Go research domestic violence statistics and look at how many cases go unprosecuted and for what reason. 
So if we hire beard you won't be a fan anymore?

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, hoosierbannerd said:

Chris007..are you sensing a retirement announcement tomorrow to make sure Sunday isn't a massively embarrassing clusterf*ck inside AH?

The UM game is Saturday. Sunday SSAH will be quiet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Kentuckysucks said:

You’re right on the trust thing and who can blame us?  The average poster on the Peegs board has been a lot better on every single hiring and firing we have made since the Knight era than the people running the Indiana administration.

Fans with good basketball knowledge know what hire would work and not. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Pagoda said:

Yea, if we hire him it's a shitstorm of media mentioning the DV allegations and the university and fans being divided over it.  Just doesn't work for IU.

The media PR would be tough at the beginning. But it would go away once we started winning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, JF87 said:

Yes.  But we didn't recruit a veteran back-up point guard, so we just told Xavier not to do it again.  

The Wizard of Broad Ripple's version of "tough love".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, AH1971 said:

Justifying domestic violence. Just wow.

No one is justifying DV, but there is more to the story than just the police report.  There are alot of things missing from that report.  Long and short of it, is no one really knows what happened that night.  Charges were dropped, because the evidence to support wasn't there, and then she recanted.  Later apoogized at the presser to Ole Miss. and stated that everything Beard did, was in self defense.  So do we believe her statement to police over that statement later..............that is the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, coonhounds said:

Hire beard. This board is a small amount of fans who will make a big deal out of his mistakes. The vast majority will be happy to be winning again. First fire woodson!

Sent from my SM-S926U using Tapatalk
 

Exactly and I am all onboard if IU hired Beard!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jeffincol said:

No one is justifying DV, but there is more to the story than just the police report.  There are alot of things missing from that report.  Long and short of it, is no one really knows what happened that night.  Charges were dropped, because the evidence to support wasn't there, and then she recanted.  Later apoogized at the presser to Ole Miss. and stated that everything Beard did, was in self defense.  So do we believe her statement to police over that statement later..............that is the issue.

I believe that the University of Texas investigated and fired him with cause. At the time he was having a lot of success, too.

Edited by PartyintheVillas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jeffincol said:

No one is justifying DV, but there is more to the story than just the police report.  There are alot of things missing from that report.  Long and short of it, is no one really knows what happened that night.  Charges were dropped, because the evidence to support wasn't there, and then she recanted.  Later apoogized at the presser to Ole Miss. and stated that everything Beard did, was in self defense.  So do we believe her statement to police over that statement later..............that is the issue.

Exactly, there is always 2 sides to every story. I am of the mind set, innocent until proven guilty but there are some that are guilty until proven innocent 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, GloryDays said:

I get it and believe me I'm with you on that part .Im also against stuffing security guards in waste cans.

Just venting but Damm I want to win.

Stevens May then Beard with a clause in his contract.

What good does a "clause in his contract" do? Assuming he's hired (and I am not conceding that point), and he does something that violates "the clause", he's gone and we're starting over again... why not just get it right this time without the risk of hiring an alcoholic woman beater on double secret probation?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jeffincol said:

No one is justifying DV, but there is more to the story than just the police report.  There are alot of things missing from that report.  Long and short of it, is no one really knows what happened that night.  Charges were dropped, because the evidence to support wasn't there, and then she recanted.  Later apoogized at the presser to Ole Miss. and stated that everything Beard did, was in self defense.  So do we believe her statement to police over that statement later..............that is the issue.

No there isn't. There is absolutely nothing that justifies what Beard did to his girlfriend regardless of who started it. Outside of your life being in an immediate danger (and no, being in a drunken argument with your significant other doesn't qualify as immediate danger), there is absolutely zero justification EVER to lay hands on another women.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Exactly, there is always 2 sides to every story. I am of the mind set, innocent until proven guilty but there are some that are guilty until proven innocent 
So am I. Especially after Duke lacrosse. I can't even imagine the meltdown on here by some if we hire beard. Because he is guilty guilty guilty to them. No trial needed . In fact they would likely vote guilty before opening statements

Sent from my SM-A146U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×