IUBB @ Northwestern - Wednesday, 2/15/23 @ 9:00 ET on BTN

[Brass Cannon 25,452]

Just now, RaceToTheTop said:

Yeah, I agree and I need to just exit.  Tired of the same old same old posters showing up when IU loses.

Yep only here when we lose.  I don’t post every game I get to watch or anything. Nope 

[LamarCheeks 22,165]

Throwing the ball all over the court didn't help matters tonight. 

The worst might have been JHS chucking it off the top of the backboard down 2 with about a minute and a half left. 

Too much adrenaline perhaps? Can't figure how the hell that happened. 

[Brass Cannon 25,452]

2 minutes ago, colonel06 said:

Woody is saying that the team was “too” hyped?!  Maybe I don’t know what that is I sure didn’t see hyped.

I don’t know. I was pretty hyped for a nap last Saturday.  

[Josh 13,233]

This same conversation happens every time Dirty Cop refs a game. Is that coincidence or a pattern that goes back to his previous career?

 

[str8baller 7,595]

3 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

It wasn't sarcasm and the contact by Woody then changed the call (by that definition you provided) to cost IU a team foul. So the index finger of Mike Woodson was the deciding factor tonight. Again not sarcasm when it's the truth.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 

I dunno…I think I agree with the other poster who said whomever on the bench got the first technical is to blame. It’s pretty unacceptable for anyone but the HC to get a T on the sideline. 

[rcbowla 8,281]

Yep only here when we lose.  I don’t post every game I get to watch or anything. Nope 

You post way more frequently when things are going bad. I will say that. You clearly know you are a leader of the negativity train. I'm not even mad at ya because I'm negative at times too but you are more active when there's something to ***** about.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

[kreigh8 2,111]

Just now, str8baller said:

I dunno…I think I agree with the other poster who said whomever on the bench got the first technical is to blame. It’s pretty unacceptable for anyone but the HC to get a T on the sideline. 

Rosemond has two of those now, correct? The other was from Xavier on the bench?

[TheWatShot 15,523]

We must have some real loose cannons on the bench during games. I think this was at least the third time this year we've had a bench technical. 

[Brass Cannon 25,452]

Just now, rcs29 said:

You post way more frequently when things are going bad. I will say that. You clearly know you are a leader of the negativity train. I'm not even mad at ya because I'm negative at times too but you are more active when there's something to ***** about.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 

Maybe. I am hesitant to get too into the excitement of the good after any good times because I am just waiting for the shoe to drop like it did tonight so that’s probably fair. 

[Brass Cannon 25,452]

1 minute ago, kreigh8 said:

Rosemond has two of those now, correct? The other was from Xavier on the bench?

Xavier one was BS if I recall correctly 

[TheWatShot 15,523]

5 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Yep only here when we lose.  I don’t post every game I get to watch or anything. Nope 

I'm not going to chastise people for when they decide to post, but the effort police are getting to be about as annoying as the court-storming police. 

[rcbowla 8,281]

I dunno…I think I agree with the other poster who said whomever on the bench got the first technical is to blame. It’s pretty unacceptable for anyone but the HC to get a T on the sideline. 

I don't disagree. I'm just saying that Woody's contact with Scrotum is why they ended up with 3 extra FT's. And I'm not even convinced he was trying to make contact. I'd do the same thing in that situation

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

[RaceToTheTop 31,268]

2 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

The things that make us the angriest are the things we know are true 

[colonel06 1,948]

I hate the sweep part of the whole thing!

[HoosierAloha 30,102]

1 minute ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Trey can control getting in front of Boie.  And he did.

So why care about what you CAN control when in the end it doesn't matter?

We can control turning the ball over (13 in this one), leaving shooters WIDE OPEN, giving e and e, c and c, i and i, and so on for the other 60-70 possessions.

Keep focusing on the extremely small %, but about that, Trey did control getting in front of him (that's great!), much better than Kopp getting stuck in first gear, but didn't stop him. If we would have controlled what we could control for the majority of the game we win this going away, ditto for the game against NW in Assembly Hall.

A couple out of 60+ ain't bad though

 

 

[Brass Cannon 25,452]

Just now, RaceToTheTop said:

You remind me of myself at 19. 

[str8baller 7,595]

2 minutes ago, kreigh8 said:

Rosemond has two of those now, correct? The other was from Xavier on the bench?

I honestly don’t remember. Generally it seems if it happens more than once a season it is an anomaly. Having it happen multiple times might warrant a change. 

[HoosierAloha 30,102]

9 minutes ago, hoopsta007 said:

It’s long past time for reform.  If IU were serious about basketball they would be making a USC type move somewhere else.  The fact is IU is ok with the corruption as long as they get their cut of the money.

Almost makes you wonder if the athletic department got that mantra from the larger university...........

[RaceToTheTop 31,268]

1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

You remind me of myself at 19. 

I'm sorry you've regressed.

[str8baller 7,595]

4 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

And I'm not even convinced he was trying to make contact. I'd do the same thing in that situation

Yea…even the announcers were skeptical it warranted a second T. Letter of the law, I suppose, but you generally don’t see it.