Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, RaceToTheTop said:

Yeah, I agree and I need to just exit.  Tired of the same old same old posters showing up when IU loses.

Yep only here when we lose.  I don’t post every game I get to watch or anything. Nope 

Posted

Throwing the ball all over the court didn't help matters tonight. 

The worst might have been JHS chucking it off the top of the backboard down 2 with about a minute and a half left. 

Too much adrenaline perhaps? Can't figure how the hell that happened. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

It wasn't sarcasm and the contact by Woody then changed the call (by that definition you provided) to cost IU a team foul. So the index finger of Mike Woodson was the deciding factor tonight. Again not sarcasm when it's the truth.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 

I dunno…I think I agree with the other poster who said whomever on the bench got the first technical is to blame. It’s pretty unacceptable for anyone but the HC to get a T on the sideline. 

Posted
Yep only here when we lose.  I don’t post every game I get to watch or anything. Nope 
You post way more frequently when things are going bad. I will say that. You clearly know you are a leader of the negativity train. I'm not even mad at ya because I'm negative at times too but you are more active when there's something to ***** about.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Posted
Just now, str8baller said:

I dunno…I think I agree with the other poster who said whomever on the bench got the first technical is to blame. It’s pretty unacceptable for anyone but the HC to get a T on the sideline. 

Rosemond has two of those now, correct? The other was from Xavier on the bench?

Posted
Just now, rcs29 said:

You post way more frequently when things are going bad. I will say that. You clearly know you are a leader of the negativity train. I'm not even mad at ya because I'm negative at times too but you are more active when there's something to ***** about.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 

Maybe. I am hesitant to get too into the excitement of the good after any good times because I am just waiting for the shoe to drop like it did tonight so that’s probably fair. 

Posted
I dunno…I think I agree with the other poster who said whomever on the bench got the first technical is to blame. It’s pretty unacceptable for anyone but the HC to get a T on the sideline. 
I don't disagree. I'm just saying that Woody's contact with Scrotum is why they ended up with 3 extra FT's. And I'm not even convinced he was trying to make contact. I'd do the same thing in that situation

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk

Posted
1 minute ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Trey can control getting in front of Boie.  And he did.

So why care about what you CAN control when in the end it doesn't matter?

We can control turning the ball over (13 in this one), leaving shooters WIDE OPEN, giving e and e, c and c, i and i, and so on for the other 60-70 possessions.

Keep focusing on the extremely small %, but about that, Trey did control getting in front of him (that's great!), much better than Kopp getting stuck in first gear, but didn't stop him. If we would have controlled what we could control for the majority of the game we win this going away, ditto for the game against NW in Assembly Hall.

A couple out of 60+ ain't bad though

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, kreigh8 said:

Rosemond has two of those now, correct? The other was from Xavier on the bench?

I honestly don’t remember. Generally it seems if it happens more than once a season it is an anomaly. Having it happen multiple times might warrant a change. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, hoopsta007 said:

It’s long past time for reform.  If IU were serious about basketball they would be making a USC type move somewhere else.  The fact is IU is ok with the corruption as long as they get their cut of the money.

Almost makes you wonder if the athletic department got that mantra from the larger university...........

Posted
4 minutes ago, rcs29 said:

And I'm not even convinced he was trying to make contact. I'd do the same thing in that situation

Yea…even the announcers were skeptical it warranted a second T. Letter of the law, I suppose, but you generally don’t see it. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...