Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
28 minutes ago, IU5355 said:

Trilly posting last night he heard so much random stuff regarding IU yesterday. Supposed to update this morning. 

If Trilly is so "in the know" I can't imagine him tipping his hat of Stevens to IU info this early. I can see IU getting a hold of him to try to quiet it down for a little bit longer. jmo

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

This is not an endorsement of Beard (I am not a fan of the hire because of what I perceive to be untreated alcohol abuse problems), but the record of a coach needs to be judged in the context of the program it was accomplished at.

Just like I am a fan of Collins, Brownell, and Schertz and Devries this year for overachieving relative to their school's potential, Beard's record is really good in context of schools like Ole Miss, and Texas Tech when he began there..

That's fair. Although I'd point out that McCasland's success at TTU suggests that it's not such a difficult place to win at after all, making Beard's final two seasons there more concerning.

Posted
12 minutes ago, IUGRAD06 said:

None of those.  I am just not a POS that thinks what he did was OK.  I am a male in his 40s.  But way to go to show your true colors there…


The Knight comment…..We need a reboot of this program.  Just ditch the past and move on.  It’s holding us back.  That’s my point.  No one should give two craps whether a coach is associated with Knight.  It shouldn’t even be a criteria.  

Just curious, what connections did Sampson, Crean, or Archie Miller have to the past??  Or to Knight??

Posted
5 minutes ago, Home Jersey said:

Yes. People also say “you are what your record says you are” about Collins all the time. When context is convenient for their narrative, people shout it from the rooftops. When context is inconvenient for their narrative, people ignore it. Lol 

My point is that both context and the total record are relevant. It's a balancing test with many, many factors. 

My summary point about Beard (or others) is that if we are only judging a coach's record by objective wins/losses or only by context, we are missing a good part of the relevant information.

Posted
1 minute ago, Stuhoo said:

My point is that both context and the total record are relevant. It's a balancing test with many, many factors. 

My summary point about Beard (or others) is that if we are only judging a coach's record by either objective wins/losses or only by context, we are missing a good part of the relevant information.

100% agree.

If only the world were as reasonable and intellectually efficient as us and the rest of BTB, Stu… there’d be everlasting peace and no more hunger…

Posted

Good lord, not sure if it's an issue with others, but I know my wife would still **** me even if I rooted for Beard. 

But she also doesn't think a man should have to get the **** beat out of him and let it happen just because of the gender of the one who's laying the @$$ whoopin. 

1 full week of Cronin, Turgeon wasn't enjoyable for alot of people either. But, we went through it

Posted
2 minutes ago, Silat Player said:

So Trilly is clearly getting his info from his from this board then. Got it...

Yea.  Isaac’s made up stuff made it to the Trilly discord in like two seconds.  It’s hard to believe anything that shows up on there.  For instance yesterday there were all those Otz rumors… almost certainly all nonsense and noise.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...