BGVille Hoosierfan Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Arizona is getting worked over at home by the worst team in the Pac12. Have to wonder what kind of position this puts Arizona in. I know the NET has Arizona top 10 but Sagarin has them at 33. Overall record would be 20-11 (10-8 in Pac12) They are 3-7 vs Quad 1, 5-3 vs Quad 2, and 12-1 vs Quads 3/4. They will have 4 sub 60 NET losses (Washington, Oregon State, St. John’s, UCLA) This resume looks similar or worse than ours. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Hutch89 1 Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Arkansas' attempt to get back int he conversation probably ended with a loss at Texas A&M today. Furman lost in the So Con quarterfinals. Not that bid of deal, but the thought was that the only way East Tennessee St could possibly have a chance of at an at large bid would have been if they lost to Furman in the finals. Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 16 minutes ago, jbell833 said: Arizona is getting worked over at home by the worst team in the Pac12. Have to wonder what kind of position this puts Arizona in. I know the NET has Arizona top 10 but Sagarin has them at 33. Overall record would be 20-11 (10-8 in Pac12) They are 3-7 vs Quad 1, 5-3 vs Quad 2, and 12-1 vs Quads 3/4. They will have 4 sub 60 NET losses (Washington, Oregon State, St. John’s, UCLA) This resume looks similar or worse than ours. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners Have gotten it down to 9 with 14 1/2 left. Pattern today has been for bubble teams to get down big, come back, and then a shot at the buzzer either wins or loses it. Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Author Posted March 8, 2020 Teams it appears with the most at stake in the next few days ... Texas Tech, Texas, Stanford, Xavier, UCLA.Bracketville Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mamasa, BGVille Hoosierfan and Hutch89 3 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Author Posted March 8, 2020 Dropped to 60 in the NET Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners LIHoosier 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Author Posted March 8, 2020 Dropped to 60 in the NET Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners4 Q1 wins with Penn St losing yesterdayStill have 3Q1a wins and 5 top 35 wins Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Hutch89 1 Quote
Hoosier Guy Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Yeah Penn State losing that game yesterday definitely drops them Quote
BGVille Hoosierfan Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Dropped to 60 in the NET Sent from my iPhone using BtownBannersDropped 9 spots after losing in the final minute to B1G Champs and top 25 team?!?! Huh??? Purdue loses to bubble team Rutgers and drops 1 spot. Ok.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app HoosierDYT, southsidehoosier, IUc2016 and 1 other 4 Quote
IUc2016 Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Dropped 9 spots after losing in the final minute to B1G Champs and top 25 team?!?! Huh??? Purdue loses to bubble team Rutgers and drops 1 spot. Ok.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appToo much based on analytics and not enough on actual results IMO. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app thebigweave, mdn82, cchuntsman and 2 others 5 Quote
BGVille Hoosierfan Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 https://bracketville.wordpress.com/bracketology/According to the #1 Bracketologist our overall seed (35) stayed the same and stayed at 9 seed. 9 teams below us before we’d even be considered to be left out.Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners thebigweave, HoosierDYT, Hoosiers96 and 2 others 5 Quote
Brass Cannon Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 18 minutes ago, IUc2016 said: Too much based on analytics and not enough on actual results IMO. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app This is bad analytic even. RaceToTheTop and BGVille Hoosierfan 2 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Author Posted March 8, 2020 According to Pomeroy rankings, #iubb (39th) is 7-11 vs. teams ranked higher than them, 12-1 vs. teams ranked lower than them.According to NET rankings, #iubb (60th) is 9-12 vs. better teams, 10-0 vs. worse teams.Chronic Hoosier Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners WayneFleekHoosier, southsidehoosier, IUc2016 and 2 others 5 Quote
MoyeNeeded Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Bad day for Bubble teams yesterday. That bodes well for us. Unless an absolute calapse vs Nebraska, we are securely in. southsidehoosier 1 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Too much based on analytics and not enough on actual results IMO. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile appIt is based on actual results. It puts emphasis on margin of defeat and margin of victory instead on just W/L. Therefore it’s trying to be a correlation of the “eye test” and analytics. Despite building a fairly solid NCAA resume we haven’t looked good in the process except for a handful of games. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app 8bucks 1 Quote
LIHoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 32 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said: It is based on actual results. It puts emphasis on margin of defeat and margin of victory instead on just W/L. Therefore it’s trying to be a correlation of the “eye test” and analytics. Despite building a fairly solid NCAA resume we haven’t looked good in the process except for a handful of games. Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app Problem is with the adj off/def numbers, weighting those too much means a couple of blowouts against decent teams outweigh a whole bunch of losses. Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 So, IU dropped 9 spots yesterday in NET....for losing a Quad 1 game. IU is at 60, Minnesota is in 40s. Can we just stop the NET madness. LIHoosier, MikeRoberts, Rookie33 and 2 others 5 Quote
WayneFleekHoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Problem is with the adj off/def numbers, weighting those too much means a couple of blowouts against decent teams outweigh a whole bunch of losses. Could be. Seems to explain some of the discrepancies. Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app Quote
RaceToTheTop Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Bracketville (top ranked bracketologist over the last five years) has IU as a 9 seed after yesterday’s games. He has no Big Ten teams truly on the bubble...IU and Rutgers at 9, Purdue not in first 8 out. mamasa, Hutch89 and Stromboli 3 Quote
LIHoosier Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 New matrix, IU drops to 1st 10 seed but is in a virtual tie with Oklahoma for last 9 seed. 28th of 36 at large teams. mamasa, chicagoHOOSIER, thebigweave and 2 others 5 Quote
Magnanimous Posted March 8, 2020 Posted March 8, 2020 Just now, LIHoosier said: New matrix, IU drops to 1st 10 seed but is in a virtual tie with Oklahoma for last 9 seed. 10 is better than 9 most years. thebigweave and BGVille Hoosierfan 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.