Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bailey7878 said:

I think we have been one of the most patient fan bases in the nation. I mean crean got three years where you could not even question him. That included his third year debacle. Davis missed the tourney two straight years and was kept.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 

Patience hasn't been a problem.  Keeping bad coaches too long has.  Making excuses instead of holding expectations has.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Bailey7878 said:

True but you do not want a situation where you go into a 4th year with a red hot coaching seat. Recruiting will be dead.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk
 

Nope. And neither does Archie which is why you see him looking for veterans to come in this offseason. No reason to complain about a year from now, when we don’t know what the roster will look like or what the outcomes of the games will be. 

Recruiting may not be dead if we miss next year because look at the experienced talent that will be on the roster that 4th year. That is shaping up to be a really good team. Win a lot then and you can recover in recruiting. 

I have no doubt in my mind Archie can get us to the Crean level of being good every 3-4 years. The question I have is, once that teams run is over, did he build for sustained success?  I won’t get that answer for a few more years but I’m liking the strategy so far. 

Posted
Bruce Pearl talk got me thinking.

 

At freaking Auburn, for basketball.

 

Year 1 15-20

Year 2 11-20

Year 3 19-14

Year 4 26-8

Year 5 29-9 and counting.

 

Archie better get some dudes.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

So we know that Bruce Pearl is both an excellent and winning coach who cheats and probably recruits dirty.

 

It took him 4 full seasons to make the tournament and have the success they’re having now.

 

Patience.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted
1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

Archie had more talent than pearl in year 2 

Yes and he won more. What’s the point? I’m a huge Pearl fan and it has taken him, like most top coaches, 4 years to build his program. You have to get your guys, then as the mature develop them. 

Posted
Just now, Feathery said:

Yes and he won more. What’s the point? I’m a huge Pearl fan and it has taken him, like most top coaches, 4 years to build his program. You have to get your guys, then as the mature develop them. 

He won more but I don’t think people thought that Pearl underachieved for his talent in year 2. 

Posted

People forget that while not only are the players developing and adapting to a new culture while said culture is not even fully established, so is CAM. This is his first high major. He didn't come into this thing knowing the exact right coaching techniques, decisions, schemes, etc to make from day one. That also takes a little *gasp* time. He came from Dayton. And sure, he has been an assistant at a higher level than Dayton, but I'd venture to say that's not exactly the same. Throw in all the potential background noise of this particular season that's now beginning to rise to the surface and you don't have an environment conducive to anyone's development, seasoned or not.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

Posted
10 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

For me personally. I was always giving him 4 years. Maybe even 5.

Doesn’t mean I won’t be grumpy along the way if we stink. Lol.




Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners

If we stink in year 4 I doubt there will be a chance for a successful year 5. Will be too toxic then 

Posted
22 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

He won more but I don’t think people thought that Pearl underachieved for his talent in year 2. 

Bc they had realistic expectations? I hoped for a NCAA tournament birth and we were close. I didn’t expect it in year 2. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

We went

12-2

1-12

6-2

We had more than enough talent to make the tourney. Reality is not based on your expectations. 

We did have enough talent. Then our PG got a concussion and missed Ames and he wasn’t the same until about 5 games left in the season. Crazy how we went on a losing streak then. Deron got injured. Race got injured. Green got suspended. That’s 3 of our best players. This also also reality and explains the 1-12. You realize if we go 3-10 or 2-11 we make the NCAA right? So all your worry is literally over 1 possible win while we were injured. 

Posted
Just now, Feathery said:

We did have enough talent. Then our PG got a concussion and missed Ames and he wasn’t the same until about 5 games left in the season. Crazy how we went on a losing streak then. Deron got injured. Race got injured. Green got suspended. That’s 3 of our best players. This also also reality and explains the 1-12. You realize if we go 3-10 or 2-11 we make the NCAA right? So all your worry is literally over 1 possible win while we were injured. 

Yes injuries explain the team not even trying against several opponents. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Feathery said:

Archie has done better in his first 2 years here than Pearl did at Auburn, as he should. Took Pearl 4 years to get it going down there and he is a damn good coach. 

Perhaps the Rifleman didn’t have any ammo until after the first couple of years!

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...