Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This hire is only risky due to him being a mid major coach, having said that, he was able to do quite a bit with what he had at Dayton. If Archie can recruit the state even a fraction better than Crean did and he can bring a strong defensive mindset to this team I think we'll turn out fine. I'm interested to see who stays and who goes from here. It's been pretty quiet about who's heading out and who's staying, will play a big role in how his first year turns out

Posted

I will support him FULL force. 100%. I think he is a good coach. I'm hopeful he can start recruiting 5 star talent. If he recruits like Sean I'll be thrilled.

I'm just going through another period of settling where I hoped Fred Glass opening up the wallet would have been an 'instant impact', 'world take notice' type hire. I really, really thought he was swinging for the fences. I actually think he did swing.

Ultimately excited to see what Archie can do.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Posted

I did some checking to see how the two schools did vs. common opponents this past season. Here is what I found:

Austin Peay: Dayton W 96-68 (Home), IU W 97-62 (Home)

Nebraska: Dayton L 78-80 (in Calif), IU L 55-68 (Away), W 63-62 (Home)

Northwestern: Dayton L 64-67 (Away), IU L 55-68 (Away), W 63-62 (Home)

So: 

vs. Austin Peay: they were pretty even.

vs. Nebraska: I would argue Dayton did a better job considering game location.

vs. Northwestern: Dayton did MUCH better playig at NU than IU did.

Make of it what you may. I also posted this in the Archie Miller hired thread.

Posted

Quick note people that think comparing Crean here is okay with comparing Archie at Dayton. He took the IU job because it was a step up. If it was the exact same he doesnt leave Dayton for a more pressured job. Crean had a hell of a lot more advantages and bigger advantages to use to his advantage at IU than Archie could use at Dayton. Success at a mid major is harder than it looks and we seem to think. Gonzaga, George Mason, WSU, VCU, Butler and Dayton are the only true mid majors with legit tourney success. You can probably throw the Zags off that list so that means 4 schools. At a program like IU the expectation is to win and compete for B1G titles and tourney runs each year. At Dayton their expectation is be good and make the tourney and be happy. So for the expectations that Archie had he did amazing. 4 straight trips and an Elite Eight spot. What do we expect Dayton to do? Constantly compete for Sweet Sixteens lol? Anytime any coach makes the switch he is making you expect him to be as good as he was and better because they get more money to spend recruiting, a bigger fan base, better facilities and when it comes to elite jobs like IU you expect the brand to help a lot as well. Yes you compete with better teams. I cant believe people are actually comparing what Dayton has done compared to IU. If you are gonna do anything compare him to the other true mid majors and he is far and away the best choice. Zags dont count and Butler and Xavier are in the Big East. VCU and WSU are the only schools that are on the level. WSU has a lot more resources than Dayton as well. WSU has KU and Missouri to deal with in recruiting. Dayton has Xavier, OSU, Cincy, IU, Butler, Purdue and ND in the area. If you don't like the hire your entitled to your own opinions but please lets not be realistically expecting Dayton to have better success than IU. That is a truly stupid argument in my book. Anything else is validated. He is 38 too. He is still very young and growing as a coach. Even if he was a finished product he still would be a good fit here. But the potential to bring us back to elite is what excites me. Carry on.

Sent from my LGLS676 using BtownBanners mobile app

Posted

I did some checking to see how the two schools did vs. common opponents this past season. Here is what I found:

Austin Peay: Dayton W 96-68 (Home), IU W 97-62 (Home)

Nebraska: Dayton L 78-80 (in Calif), IU L 55-68 (Away), W 63-62 (Home)

Northwestern: Dayton L 64-67 (Away), IU L 55-68 (Away), W 63-62 (Home)

So: 

vs. Austin Peay: they were pretty even.

vs. Nebraska: I would argue Dayton did a better job considering game location.

vs. Northwestern: Dayton did MUCH better playing at NU than IU did.

Make of it what you may. I also posted this in the "Who do we hire" thread.

Posted

You want me to name 1?

Tony Bennett. I've said it all year long.

Also, for ME, I'd have taken Alford. (Couldn't because 1/4 of IU fans hate him) but he would have been successful with the fanbase behind him.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

With an Alford hire, I would have been paying much more attention to what was happening with Butlers program
Posted
9 minutes ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:


You want me to name 1?

Tony Bennett. I've said it all year long.

Also, for ME, I'd have taken Alford. (Couldn't because 1/4 of IU fans hate him) but he would have been successful with the fanbase behind him.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Agree on Tony. No actual source I'd take for gospel but seems his family didn't want to relocate. He reciprocated interest to Parker but couldn't get it done- from an actual source. 

Alford I was so out on. I don't get that one but am certainly willing to listen...

Posted
46 minutes ago, iufaninillinois said:


Your post was empty on my Android tablet. Is this the JBJ tweet with the eyes? If so, I was trying to figure that out also.

Sent from my SM-T377V using Tapatalk
 

yeah it was

Posted
I will support him FULL force. 100%. I think he is a good coach. I'm hopeful he can start recruiting 5 star talent. If he recruits like Sean I'll be thrilled.

I'm just going through another period of settling where I hoped Fred Glass opening up the wallet would have been an 'instant impact', 'world take notice' type hire. I really, really thought he was swinging for the fences. I actually think he did swing.

Ultimately excited to see what Archie can do.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Im sure he did and stevens and donovan said no. After that its a crap shoot. I guess we could of had alford buy he is not that well liked and cant get past the sweet sixeteen.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted

Ugh.

 

I feel disappointed. Miller is all potential. I'm not sold on him as an X's and O's stand point. As far as what I've seen, his offense is damn near the same crap as Crean.

He's young which is great, but I much rather have White or Holtmann.

Posted

I understand that and that is why it wouldn't work.

He's doing pretty well at UCLA and with his recruiting I expect it to continue. Time will tell.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Feel like time has told? Just had the best offense he's ever assembled with one of the top PGs we've seen in college lately. Defense was his undoing, like it's always been.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

1. Stevens
2. Donovan
3. Sean Miller
4. Few
5. Bennett
5. Alford
6. Marshall
7. Probably Archie 7. But I don't think he is necessarily, without a doubt, currently better than Collins, White, Huggins, Martin, and a host of others.

His age and family ties give hope. His results are pretty good. He's on the list. Of the "realistic"-whatever that means- list he is 2-4 for me. I like his youth a lot.



Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

Alford in your top 5/6 says it all. No quibble with rest

Sent from my SM-T377V using Tapatalk

Posted
Agree on Tony. No actual source I'd take for gospel but seems his family didn't want to relocate. He reciprocated interest to Parker but couldn't get it done- from an actual source. 
Alford I was so out on. I don't get that one but am certainly willing to listen...

Tony was my main squeeze not named Donovan or Stevens.

Alford just went 31-5 in a good pac12 with a number 2 recruiting class coming in. Yes, he lost S16 but he was there and had a good chance. His recruiting and style will have them top 20 most of the time and 1-6 seed about every year.

I think with a united fanbase it would be similar here. He isn't a sure bet and I get that. That's why he was down my list. I think if the fanbase was behind him he'd be a lesser gamble than the mid major guys.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners
Posted

1. Stevens
2. Donovan
3. Sean Miller
4. Few
5. Bennett
5. Alford
6. Marshall
7. Probably Archie 7. But I don't think he is necessarily, without a doubt, currently better than Collins, White, Huggins, Martin, and a host of others.

His age and family ties give hope. His results are pretty good. He's on the list. Of the "realistic"-whatever that means- list he is 2-4 for me. I like his youth a lot.



Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners

I'll take Archie over Sean all day. We know what Sean can do with tons of talent.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...