Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

ccgeneral

(2015) C Thomas Bryant to IU

Recommended Posts

I have a gut feeling that we wont land him. Too much uncertainty in our program.

Uncertainty?

 

The coach said he's staying. The AD said he's staying.

 

Whether that ends up being the case, it doen;t sound uncertain

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
All I see is the media wanting a hot story about Crean being fired or leaving. Then a few boosters aren't high on him. I don't think there is anything else to see here. We are talking this thing into the ground but.. What else should we be talking about? Lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uncertainty?

 

The coach said he's staying. The AD said he's staying.

 

Whether that ends up being the case, it doen;t sound uncertain

 

The AD DID NOT say "he's staying".

 

The AD said "I continue to support Tom Crean as our coach."

 

Those are VERY different statements. Very, very different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The AD DID NOT say "he's staying".

 

The AD said "I continue to support Tom Crean as our coach."

 

Those are VERY different statements. Very, very different.

He said it 3 weeks ago.

I wouldn't kiss fans or media's ass's either and repeat myself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Uncertainty?

 

The coach said he's staying. The AD said he's staying.

 

Whether that ends up being the case, it doen;t sound uncertain

 

 

He said it 3 weeks ago.

I wouldn't kiss fans or media's ass's either and repeat myself.

 

Not quite, my Crean-supportive friend!  Three weeks ago he said:

 

"I'm bullish on Tom...He's done a really good job with these guys. It's ridiculous to say that someone is coaching for his job for one game and that it would be up or down in one game...He's a great coach...He has my full support. I have a great deal of confidence in Tom's body of work. This team overachieved early and then hit a tough patch."

"There is a sense that Tom is only keeping his job because of the buyout...And while that's a big number and a significant amount of money, that's not what is keeping him in the job. I think he needs to be the coach. ... I want him to be the coach here."

 

What he DID NOT say three weeks ago is that..."He's staying"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little off topic but he misses most of his rebounds by going for the weakside block.  Bryant seems to be ahead in the fundamental department already maybe he could help get through the Perea on this.

  I've always thought that Perea would be better served as a weak side defender and cleanup man on offense.

With Bryant here we could use the two together with troy on the wing.The key word being could.

  I really feel small ball is a bad idea in this physical league.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've always thought that Perea would be better served as a weak side defender and cleanup man on offense.
With Bryant here we could use the two together with troy on the wing.The key word being could.
I really feel small ball is a bad idea in this physical league.


Couldn't agree more. HMP looks great when he has space to create on O/D and a player in a more engaged role (IE Bryant) could definitely allow HMP to roam without blowing assignments. From the limited film, that seems to be Bryant's forte, though it's always tough to tell when watching HS/AAU mix tapes. Either way, those two (along with Troy) could provide some outstanding highlights

(Disclaimer: Yes, I know that, according to this board, CTC won't use him right and that I'm dreaming)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You realize it wasn't lack of post presence that killed our defense. It was our lack of being able to stop dribble penetration at the wings. Remember to wasn't the same team minus Vonleh. We also had JBJR and Johnson as new starters. Adding a big doesn't fix our defense as simply as you are stating. There must be improvement on the wings first and foremost. Look at other teams of our size (MSU) and their ability to play defense.

MSU has enough size. Matt Costello is 6-9 245, Hanner is 6-9 225. Similar but not the same. Izzo's roster contains many forwards who play as big men, Draymond Green, Brandon Dawson, even Adreian Payne a little, but they all can fight with the big boys and be a bruiser when they need to. Izzo is a great defensive coach and even defended Tony Bennet's Cavaliers better than the best defensive team in the country. Hanner is just smaller in every category than the other centers of the Big Ten. Look at Brandon Dawson today in the game, in the final minutes he and his team would grab rebounds with effort, with force, with desire. That is something that this team lacked, a will. I would like our team to be like a Duke(obviously, being realistic, not at that caliber) but have a tall decent big man( Jahlil Okafor) but also have a good forward who can rebound(Justise Winslow). The problem with our defense is defending in the paint. Sure, our wings aren't the best defenders, but if they play defense, but get beat, a shot blocker should be there to help create havoc for the dribbler. Our Guards need to take a leap defensively and Thomas Bryant needs to get his ass to Bloomington and start improving this team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our Guards need to take a leap defensively and Thomas Bryant needs to get his ass to Bloomington and start improving this team.


Slightly OT, but does anyone have any data (defensive efficiency type #s I guess) that shows how much guards have improved year to year under CTC and if we can expect our guards to make a leap forward? I contend that Bryant could help simply by making other teams think twice, but I understand our guards have to be defensively competent first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Slightly OT, but does anyone have any data (defensive efficiency type #s I guess) that shows how much guards have improved year to year under CTC and if we can expect our guards to make a leap forward? I contend that Bryant could help simply by making other teams think twice, but I understand our guards have to be defensively competent first.

I was looking for a stat that showed what teams average in the paint against us. Couldn't find one though, Oladipo improved greatly defensively and I think RoJo can too, if JBJ wants to he could as well, just don't think he'll really spend the offseason on defense. He would prefer shooting half putters just in case he gets the ball with a second left in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not quite, my Crean-supportive friend!  Three weeks ago he said:

 

"I'm bullish on Tom...He's done a really good job with these guys. It's ridiculous to say that someone is coaching for his job for one game and that it would be up or down in one game...He's a great coach...He has my full support. I have a great deal of confidence in Tom's body of work. This team overachieved early and then hit a tough patch."

"There is a sense that Tom is only keeping his job because of the buyout...And while that's a big number and a significant amount of money, that's not what is keeping him in the job. I think he needs to be the coach. ... I want him to be the coach here."

 

What he DID NOT say three weeks ago is that..."He's staying"

 

It's not about supporting anyone. It's about a bunch of adults going looney because they want to play semantics and say what someone else must do, say, be, think in order for some perceived reality to actually be reality.

 

I'm "get a damn good coach", supportive. Not "let's change because we don't like the current guy for the sake of change", .band waggoned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way.

 

"There is a sense that Tom is only keeping his job because of the buyout," Glass said. "And while that's a big number and a significant amount of money, that's not what is keeping him in the job."

 

I think you'd need to come out and change your tune or make a change, before it changes to not having a job.

 

Go get me a top 5-10 coach (not in his 60's) and I'll be ok with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×