Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

If you asked me if IU deserved to be in the tournament my answer would depend on the number of teams that are in.  This is nothing magical about 64, 68 or 76 teams  Is the 64 or 68 team tournament worse than when it was 32 teams?

Honestly, I like the simplicity of a 64 team tournament, probably because it’s fun filling out a simple bracket and offers a nice mix of teams.  More teams means a more complex bracket that might impact casual interest.

Additionally, I’ve rarely seen a bubble team that I thought was compelling enough to expand the tournament for.  When you add in that many of the new teams will likely be power 5 teams with losing conference records, I just don’t see how this improves the tournament product. It just seems like we are adding a bunch of uninteresting games between marginal teams.

To me it’s simply a money grab that may damage the product and end up being a money loser in the long-term.

Posted
4 minutes ago, fwgreenway said:

Uconn must have watched some of the pre-game hype - be like Hammer Time, can't touch this!

Hammer Time commercials are funny....commercials with new AT&T character Ted, not funny, stupid, piss me off!

Posted

How is UCon essentially always getting a good look? 
Either their guards beat their man and they kick or the motion results in a clean look. Every time. Great passing. 

The absolute dogs*** basketball we’ve had to watch the last decade is torturous. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...