Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

In hindsight, I wish I wouldn't have posted his stats.  He does not have a formal offer and Woody has not seen him play in an actual game and he may never receive a formal offer so I'd just caution everyone to save the fretting and stewing until he actually receives an offer if one is ever extended.  Over and out.

I appreciate the post, actually.  Even if he hasn't received a formal offer, it's pretty evident he's at least on the radar.

And people shouldn't ever read in much into just a 6 game stat total anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

https://247sports.com/college/basketball/recruiting/article/daquan-davis-providence-alabama-texas-am-indiana-220375174/

Indiana: “They’ve been on me heavy and they like my game. They don’t really recruit point guards but they didn’t get Boogie and said I was next on their list. They really love my game.”

Posted
1 hour ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

https://247sports.com/college/basketball/recruiting/article/daquan-davis-providence-alabama-texas-am-indiana-220375174/

Indiana: “They’ve been on me heavy and they like my game. They don’t really recruit point guards but they didn’t get Boogie and said I was next on their list. They really love my game.”

IU, Texas A&M and Bama is kind of an interesting triumvirate. Those are some strong NIL programs, certainly more so than Providence. 

Posted
7 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

I know you got slack for posting his numbers, but he just put up back to back good games:  17 points, 10 assists, and 7 rebounds followed by 22 points, 7 rebounds, and 9 assists.  Also shot 14 of 23 and 4 of 9 from three.  Only three turnovers to the sixteen assists in the pair of games

Sorry for being lazy, and not researching it myself. lol

But are most of his attempts, inside the arc, from midrange or at the rim. Either way, those are impressive numbers. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, J34 said:

Sorry for being lazy, and not researching it myself. lol

But are most of his attempts, inside the arc, from midrange or at the rim. Either way, those are impressive numbers. 

I don't know -- just pulling them off his player page.  I think he is best and driving and dishing and his outside game is developing.  He is putting up close to 6 assists per game in about 25 minutes.  FWIW, he's averaging 13.7 points, 4.7 rebounds, and 5.6 assists and his OTE team is 8-1.

Posted
1 minute ago, RaceToTheTop said:

I don't know -- just pulling them off his player page.  I think he is best and driving and dishing and his outside game is developing.  He is putting up close to 6 assists per game in about 25 minutes.  FWIW, he's averaging 13.7 points, 4.7 rebounds, and 5.6 assists and his OTE team is 8-1.

As long as his character is good, I might be warming up to this kid. Regardless of height, if he competes, take him.

Cupps, Galloway,  Newton, Davis, and Gunn next year.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
2 hours ago, Hardwood83 said:

SI.com story

That's ok, I would just ask to add a very good shooter from the portal too.

Agree with that - really think getting a guy over 6’11 will be first priority in portal. Reneau, Mgbako, and even Queen if he commits, IU will still need a big-big. 

Posted

The fact that Woody can take a look at his current roster and the 2024 class and he still hasn't decided if he wants to recruit this kid or not is going to make my head explode. The recruiting strategy needs to change if we are ever going to be a consistently elite team.

Posted
18 minutes ago, IU_FanClub said:

The fact that Woody can take a look at his current roster and the 2024 class and he still hasn't decided if he wants to recruit this kid or not is going to make my head explode. The recruiting strategy needs to change if we are ever going to be a consistently elite team.

I think I'd probably prefer a portal addition over Davis as a FR. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, IU_FanClub said:

We should be going after both. We need guards on the roster, we are about to probably have Gabe Cupps as a freshman starting possibly our toughest 4 game stretch of the season because we don't have any guard depth.

Hmmmm. How about... I'd take 2 portals over Davis? 

I don't really have a problem with Cupps starting. I don't see where we could have carried more good guards, realistically. 

Posted
Just now, btownqb said:

Hmmmm. How about... I'd take 2 portals over Davis? 

I don't really have a problem with Cupps starting. I don't see where would could have carried more good guards, realistically. 

Yeah I mean if you can get them that works but I would like to have some guards we develop as well so we aren't in the constant cycle of needing rentals out of the portal.

Posted
Just now, IU_FanClub said:

Yeah I mean if you can get them that works but I would like to have some guards we develop as well so we aren't in the constant cycle of needing rentals out of the portal.

Davis HAS to be that guy? Idk. We aren't desperate. I prefer the older players, renting them doesn't bother me. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, btownqb said:

Davis HAS to be that guy? Idk. We aren't desperate. I prefer the older players, renting them doesn't bother me. 

As of right now our guards for next year are Cupps, Galloway, Newton (health?), Gunn, Leal?

 

I would put us in the desperate category at this point.

 

I don't have any problem renting players but I just don't want us to be in the position of every spring portal season deciding how our upcoming season goes.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

I feel like the telling stat when questioning whether small point guards can get the job done is rebounding. At 6'0" DaQuan Davis is averaging almost 5 rebounds per game at OTE. To me that means he is a physical 'dog' of a player. Add some good shooting stats and he seems to be an excellent pickup. And if he helps with DQueen? All the better.

Two other things: on his most recent highlight video he easily slams it on an unguarded breakaway and some of his three point makes are waaaay behind the arc (and fairly effortless from long distance).

We consistently get burned by players who "aren't good enough" to get an IU offer, but many continue to default to the rankings. Personally, I think its a lazy way to evaluate players. Seriously, does anyone think the same person looks at all top 100 players? I'd love to see the algorithm used to determine level of skill, competition, player drive, intangibles, mental acuity, gym time, etc. How do you really determine that the 28th ranked player will be more successful than the 33rd ranked player? It's fun for fans, but I really don't put much more value in it than that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...