Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

Class of '66 Old Fart

(2022) - PF Noah Clowney to Alabama

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, ElectricBoogaloo said:

If it's about $$$, why are we not the hands down winner? Does anyone in Alabama care about basketball? 

IU NIL should be significantly more or we're really screwing up the potential.

Oates is a really coach and Alabama is a solid program right now.  Clowney is a southern kid as well.

Really doesn't matter -- Clowney chose what he feels is best for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, DChoosier said:

I took a look at the Banks thread (duh…LOL) and it sounds like he is currently more of a 3/4 tweener while Clowney is more of a 4 (ie closer to filling TJD’s shoes).

Banks stats last year from high school:

29 games, 23.5 ppg, shot 63% overall from the field, 38% from three (40 of 105), 70% from the line, 8.5 rebounds per game, 1.5 assists.  Stat line does look like a 3/4 tweener.  Like his ability to shoot for a 6'8" kid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, DChoosier said:

I took a look at the Banks thread (duh…LOL) and it sounds like he is currently more of a 3/4 tweener while Clowney is more of a 4 (ie closer to filling TJD’s shoes).

Clowney wouldn't have replaced TJD. TJD has been a last year and this year. He hasn't been a 4 since before Brunk got hurt. The starting 4 and 5 next year are likely on the roster already. Geronimo is the likely 4 and Durr or Duncomb is the likely 5 baring a transfer portal addition to one of those spots that is a STUD. Banks is a 3/4 tweener. He's currently more of a 4 that could be a 3 at some point. Clowney was currently more of a thin 5 that could turn into a 4. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wonder if the big ten reputation of being so physical and a slower pace was the main factor.  Most bigs in the big ten are not as athletic and just more physically opposing.  You don't see many tall and slender big guys so Clowney probably looked at that.
That very well could have been a factor.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

I wonder if the big ten reputation of being so physical and a slower pace was the main factor.  Most bigs in the big ten are not as athletic and just more physically opposing.  You don't see many tall and slender big guys so Clowney probably looked at that.

I would say it was definitely brought up by the other schools.  Every B1G school that recruits against another conference is going to run into it.   Cost Sparty a recruit last year.   I’m guessing that hasn’t been the only one lost because of it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The domino’s of recruiting always fascinate me.   Not just IU’s but on a national level.  One teams loss(IU’s with Clowney) become another teams gain potentially.   Houston looks like the team that will gain from the Clowney domino.   Looks like Jarace Walker the top rated PF in the 2022 class is going to Houston now instead of Bama 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The physicality of the conference could definitely be a big factor and we could debate all day who is a 3 vs 4 vs 5, but by my count of who I’m considering power forwards that we either made a list cut for or got at least an unofficial visit from we’ve gone 0 for 13 since TJD committed on 11/30/2018.  I am excited about this staff and their ability and a lot of these misses go back to the prior regime, so please don’t take it as a dig at our current staff as I’m sure they did everything they could to get Clowney, Filipowski, Reneau, etc.  It just seems like it’s been extra difficult for us to get across the finish line with a recruit at that position for whatever reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IU Scott said:

I wonder if the big ten reputation of being so physical and a slower pace was the main factor.  Most bigs in the big ten are not as athletic and just more physically opposing.  You don't see many tall and slender big guys so Clowney probably looked at that.

I know from a UNC perspective, that they used this to approach recruits when there was a kid with offers from the big ten.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, IU Scott said:

I remember Rabjohn saying he talked to recruits who said they didn't want to play the big ten style of play.

Don’t remember if they flat out said it, but it was clearly a factor for both Garcia and Mason Miller.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, IU Scott said:

I remember Rabjohn saying he talked to recruits who said they didn't want to play the big ten style of play.

I looked at 247 recruits rankings.

28 of the top 35 players have committed.

JHS, going to IU, is the ONLY one of the 28 committed players going to the Big Ten.

No Big Ten school leads for any of the remaining 7 players. If that turns out to be true JHS will be the only top 35 recruit going to the BT. 

The 28 top 35 commits so far:

SEC (11) - UK-3, Bama 2, Soon to be Texas 2, Arkansas 1, S. Carolina 1, Florida 1, LSU 1, 

PAC 10 (5) UCLA 3, Oregon 2

ACC (5) Duke 3, UNC 1, ND 1

Big 12 (4) Kansas 3, Baylor 1

Nova 1, Houston 1, IU 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

I looked at 247 recruits rankings.

28 of the top 35 players have committed.

JHS, going to IU, is the ONLY one of the 28 committed players going to the Big Ten.

No Big Ten school leads for any of the remaining 7 players. If that turns out to be true JHS will be the only top 35 recruit going to the BT. 

The 28 top 35 commits so far:

SEC (11) - UK-3, Bama 2, Soon to be Texas 2, Arkansas 1, S. Carolina 1, Florida 1, LSU 1, 

PAC 10 (5) UCLA 3, Oregon 2

ACC (5) Duke 3, UNC 1, ND 1

Big 12 (4) Kansas 3, Baylor 1

Nova 1, Houston 1, IU 1

Wow…Howard at UM is cooling off a bit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

Wow…Howard at UM is cooling off a bit.

 It really hasn´t. He landed the number 10, 16, 45, 46, 115, and 145 ranked players according to 247 composite in 2021. That’s two 5*’s, three 4*’s, and one 3*.  In 2022 he’s got number 37, 39, 61, and 108 and they are considered by some to be the leader for Ty Rodgers who’s ranked 54th. That’s four 4* commits and they could add a 5th. They haven’t landed a 5 star in 2022 but they also didn’t seriously target very many. They’ve gotten most of their targets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, DChoosier said:

I looked at 247 recruits rankings.

28 of the top 35 players have committed.

JHS, going to IU, is the ONLY one of the 28 committed players going to the Big Ten.

No Big Ten school leads for any of the remaining 7 players. If that turns out to be true JHS will be the only top 35 recruit going to the BT. 

The 28 top 35 commits so far:

SEC (11) - UK-3, Bama 2, Soon to be Texas 2, Arkansas 1, S. Carolina 1, Florida 1, LSU 1, 

PAC 10 (5) UCLA 3, Oregon 2

ACC (5) Duke 3, UNC 1, ND 1

Big 12 (4) Kansas 3, Baylor 1

Nova 1, Houston 1, IU 1

Interesting.  I think it might be worth mentioning that I think the Big Ten does employ less of a strategy to recruit potential one and dones than other conferences, which I think isn't a new thing.  I can't find it for every year, but from 2011-2015 the number of one and dones by conference:

Big Ten (2):  Only Noah Vonleh and D'Angelo Russell

SEC (14):  12 were Kentucky players

Big 12 (9):  4 were Kansas, 4 were Texas

ACC (9):  6 were Duke

PAC 12 (6)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we are talking about just Indiana's recruiting, I think Woodson's effort so far given that he was hired just this spring have been pretty good -- 

transfer portal:  obtained Xavier Johnson, Miller Kopp, and Durr;  lost Durham and Franklin, kept everyone else.

recruits:  kept Logan Duncomb, added another 21 in Tamar Bates; in 22 has obtained 247 composite #20, 81, and 150;  2023 has already obtained 247 composite #67.

Considering how teams typically have a talent drop immediately on a coaching change before recovering, that's really not too bad.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×