Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

IUc2016

NCAA MBB Transfer Portal

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

It’s per 40 minutes. We saw the per 40 minutes number being frequently used last offseason for Geronimo as proof that he’s a stud, but we know how that turned out. 

?  Jordan Geronimo's per 40s weren't great entering last season.  In 2021-22, he 13.8 points and had 11.3 rebounds per 40.  Race Thompson's per 40 that year were 15.5 and 10.6 and people weren't calling Race a stud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ngw7183 said:

 

either way, might as well get on board as his commitment appears imminent 

Ugh, please no.  Time to make sacrifices to the basketball gods to avoid this.

I'd feel differently if he brought shooting or something this team actually needs, but he's not a scorer and has no business even thinking about taking a 3.  He's a body to spell Reneau but he's not good.  A move like this makes me think they put their eggs in the Ledlum/Knecht basket and are getting desperate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JSHoosier said:

Ugh, please no.  Time to make sacrifices to the basketball gods to avoid this.

I'd feel differently if he brought shooting or something this team actually needs, but he's not a scorer and has no business even thinking about taking a 3.  He's a body to spell Reneau but he's not good.  A move like this makes me think they put their eggs in the Ledlum/Knecht basket and are getting desperate.

You can’t win a lot of games if Walker is asked to play big minutes….BUT you can lose a lot of games if you only have three bigs on you roster and one gets hurt.  He was a 10 minute guy on a final four team.  That’s not chopped liver.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, JSHoosier said:

Ugh, please no.  Time to make sacrifices to the basketball gods to avoid this.

I'd feel differently if he brought shooting or something this team actually needs, but he's not a scorer and has no business even thinking about taking a 3.  He's a body to spell Reneau but he's not good.  A move like this makes me think they put their eggs in the Ledlum/Knecht basket and are getting desperate.

Just curious:

What is the general quality that you expect from the 11th or 12th player on our roster who would be the fourth big?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

You can’t win a lot of games if Walker is asked to play big minutes….BUT you can lose a lot of games if you only have three bigs on you roster and one gets hurt.  He was a 10 minute guy on a final four team.  That’s not chopped liver.

Miami didn't have much of a front line, tallest player to get more than 12 minutes was 6'7, so it's not like he was getting beat out by better bigs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

Just curious:

What is the general quality that you expect from the 11th or 12th player on our roster who would be the fourth big?

Our roster isn’t good enough at this point to be rounding it off with an 11th or 12th guy. We lost 4 starters off last year’s team. The additions we make should be starter-quality, not end of the bench insurance policies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hoosierfan2017 said:

Our roster isn’t good enough at this point to be rounding it off with an 11th or 12th guy. We lost 4 starters off last year’s team. The additions we make should be starter-quality, not end of the bench insurance policies. 

The order in which those pieces get solidified is not entirely up to the staff. Its timing.

If they miss on a couple guys they like for the top of the rotation and there aren't any out there, at the time, that they determine fits the top, why would they sit around and not plug the other spots on the roster they think need addressed? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, jbeaman9 said:

The order in which those pieces get solidified is not entirely up to the staff. Its timing.

If they miss on a couple guys they like for the top of the rotation and there aren't any out there, at the time, that they determine fits the top, why would they sit around and not plug the other spots on the roster they think need addressed? 

We don’t have unlimited roster space. We have three scholarships available. If they don’t plan to use the third available scholarship as has been reported, that leaves two scholarships. Doesn’t really give you much to work with to land guys for the top of the rotation if you’re going after an end of the bench guy with one of the two. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

We don’t have unlimited roster space. We have three scholarships available. If they don’t plan to use the third available scholarship as has been reported, that leaves two scholarships. Doesn’t really give you much to work with to land guys for the top of the rotation if you’re going after an end of the bench guy with one of the two. 

So your solution is to

  1. go after solely the big fish,
  2. not pursue back of the rotation guys until all big fish decide,
  3. and then??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, btownqb said:

I'm so confused by not understanding our approach. 

Seems like they want 1 more big (bench) and then a starting caliber wing(2,3,or 4 that can shoot).  Leaving 1 spot open for someone coming available unexpected. Just to allow that flexibility and it keeps a scholarship open for a high school kid in the next class. 
 

Allowing the young guys like Gunn, Cupps, etc to get backup minutes. With the rate MR would foul as a freshmen a 4th post player is necessary imo. 
 

just how I’m seeing it play out. No inside info. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Feathery said:

Seems like they want 1 more big (bench) and then a starting caliber wing(2,3,or 4 that can shoot).  Leaving 1 spot open for someone coming available unexpected. Just to allow that flexibility and it keeps a scholarship open for a high school kid in the next class. 
 

Allowing the young guys like Gunn, Cupps, etc to get backup minutes. With the rate MR would foul as a freshmen a 4th post player is necessary imo. 
 

just how I’m seeing it play out. No inside info. 

Agree. It just seems everything they've done/tried is exactly what they should be doing. Ledlum didn't bite, Ware+Sparks did. 

Fill other holes, find skill sets that make you versatile. The timing/or worry of "getting Walker before a wing" isn't really a thing.. fairly easy to multitask. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hoosierfan2017 said:

We don’t have unlimited roster space. We have three scholarships available. If they don’t plan to use the third available scholarship as has been reported, that leaves two scholarships. Doesn’t really give you much to work with to land guys for the top of the rotation if you’re going after an end of the bench guy with one of the two. 

We aren't going to get three top end rotation/starters with the remaining three scholarships.  There aren't unlimited minutes as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×