Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

IUc2016

NCAA MBB Transfer Portal

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, IUHoosier5 said:

Take it with a grain of salt but as a hypothetical, how does BTB feel about this?

5F10C612-3455-4887-B56F-E06B3FEE00E3.png

Thanks for posting this. To me, if we get Ware and Ledlum, idk if I see a reason to bring in another big. We would have Reneau, Sparks, and Ware, with Ledlum also playing some 4. 
Will trust the staff, but would prefer the staff to focus on shooting if we get Ware and Ledlum. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, BottomLine said:

That's what everyone said when Samson started making phone calls that were not permitted.  They were only phone calls, right?   Everyone else does it.  The NCAA will never catch us.  Level the playing field, right.  What is a little cheating when it comes to winning championships.  No I do not jest.  IU has always tried to run a clean program and do things the right way.  The NIL and transfer portal are new and there are always cheaters out there.  Some won't be caught.  Some will.  Want to take the chance and run a dirty program?  Not me.  I have some pride in my school.

I hear you.  But it's pretty much an open secret that the NIL "collective" is the equivalent of the GM's salary budget.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, JSHoosier said:

That'd be the number 2, 45, and 75 players in the portal.  It'd be a haul, but we'd still need shooting (dear basketball gods, please be Knecht).

Not sure how much time DeLoach would get here with those 2.  He'd be the athletic rim defending/rebounding type guy but scores entirely from the post and put backs.  I read he's talked to Thompson and Aljami Durham and both said great things about IU.

Those rankings are laughable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Tasmanian Devil said:

Damn - I’m been driving for 10 hours and finally get to my destination. 1st thing I do before going to sleep? Catch up on the thread!!

Summary from last 30 hours:

* We got him - he will pop tomorrow!

* Crap - he’s taking his Bama visit. We’re screwed!!

* Oops - Oats loses ALL his assistants.

*Ware CANCELS the visit!!! HELL YEAH!!

 

Is that close? 

I think it was just IU the whole time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, IUHoosier5 said:

Take it with a grain of salt but as a hypothetical, how does BTB feel about this?

5F10C612-3455-4887-B56F-E06B3FEE00E3.png

Personally, I can't put a lot of faith into a Twitter account with 189 followers.  Hope it's true.  Want it to be true.  But until there's confirmation from what I consider to be reliable sources it's just noise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Banks and Ledlum could be 3s.

Banks can guard small post players and a lot of perimeter players, but he’s going to have to figure out how he’s going to score if he wants to play. I would assume from our transfer targets, Woody wants him him out on the perimeter. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Why?

Because some they rank some on their potential, some they rank on what they've actually done in college, others.. I have no clue how they could come up with that ranking. 

It's one of the more useless exercises we tie ourselves to. It is an imperfect science, admittedly, but mercy. I've multiple sites have Tamar Bates ranked ahead Sparks. That's wild, for instance. 

Bates is ahead of the Gilbert kid from UNLV. These sites won't admit how bad they screwed up the first time when doing these rankings. Ware at #2.. no. Just no. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, btownqb said:

Because some they rank some on their potential, some they rank on what they've actually done in college, others.. I have no clue how they could come up with that ranking. 

It's one of the more useless exercises we tie ourselves to. It is an imperfect science, admittedly, but mercy. I've multiple sites have Tamar Bates ranked ahead Sparks. That's wild, for instance. 

Bates is ahead of the Gilbert kid from UNLV. These sites won't admit how bad they screwed up the first time when doing these rankings. Ware at #2.. no. Just no. 

So true.

Ware might not start at IU. Ledlum would start and lead the team.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Woodson1980 said:

Babysitting a brisket for today until after midnight all the while checking this sight.

When it came out of the stall and hit temp at 4:30AM I took it off the smoker and checked this sight again.Just got back up and immediately checked in again 

I have grandkids coming in one hour.

WTF is wrong with me?

Nothing. I'm getting ready to smoke some meatballs for spaghetti tonight for the family. What you're doing seems like a very normal Saturday for me lol 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

So true.

Ware might not start at IU. Ledlum would start and lead the team.

I don't mean to keep harping on Tamar, because I do hope succeeds... but he's ranked ahead of Primo Spears, who avged 15p 5a 3r in a Power 6 conference last year?!?! 

Nooooope. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't mean to keep harping on Tamar, because I do hope succeeds... but he's ranked ahead of Primo Spears, who avged 15p 5a 3r in a Power 6 conference last year?!?! 
Nooooope. 

Sometimes you are just who you are. But team fit, usage, style of play are all factors in figuring out what you can become plus the dreaded eye test. IMO, it’s obvious Bates can hit shots, just not at IU. Will that follow him forever? Maybe. But he played at a level in HS and AAU to be considered a borderline 5 star. The reality is he’s probably somewhere between where he was ranked and what Indiana fans think of him. The same way the NBA tries to draft on potential, these transfer rankings factor in that as well.

Take Kel Ware for example. Stats arent good. But you watch the film and see what he could become. It’s always a bit of a gamble but it’s the whole Ceiling vs Floor debate and the Moneyball debate. Do you take the proven guy with a limited ceiling or the potential that’s unproven. I believe some of these rankings try to factor those aspects into it. But yes, you are right, they are kind of a crapshoot with some semblance of common sense merit.

Lol. Long story, long.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, btownqb said:

I don't mean to keep harping on Tamar, because I do hope succeeds... but he's ranked ahead of Primo Spears, who avged 15p 5a 3r in a Power 6 conference last year?!?! 

Nooooope. 

As much as Bates struggled shooting the ball, he shot 37% from three.  Spears shot 30%.  Spears was also near the national leaders in turnovers.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×