Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

LIHoosier

IU vs Uof6 Game Thread

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Magnanimous said:

Assuming Romeo leaves, I see no reason to believe next year’s team will be much better, even with Brooks. They’ll be very young again, and I’m pretty much writing off Hunter, Anderson, Forrester, and Thompson getting any real chance to develop on the court this year, especially as conference play picks up. 

I think year four is when both his system and players should be implemented to the point he can reasonably be expected to compete for a deep tourney run. 

Let me caveat my response by saying I don't expect us to be lights out next year. I do expect us to be deeper, healthier, and more consistent in Archie's system. And I expect us to get better as the year goes along. 

Way to early to predict next year with any certainty, but here's what my gut says...
Phin will become the leader of this team.
At 3-5, assuming we end up with both Jackson-Davis and Brooks, a JD, Brooks, Smith, Davis should be a pretty good 3-5 rotation as the year goes on.
SG/CG is the biggest hole IMO.  Durham and Green need to be steady, and hopefully Franklin comes ready to shoot. He's an interesting prospect and could create some nice matchups at his size. 

And I wouldn't write all the other guys off. I think there will be a few that step up during the year. 
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

You are the one that made a baseless claim that it’s not fair to judge till year 3. 

The fact you made a laundry list of excuses for why those coaches were successful in years 1 or 2 doesn’t prove a dang thing. 

Tons of coaches are able to step in and instill their system within a year. Crean has his system in place by year 2. It was a crap system but it was in place. 

Those were not excuses. it was simple fact and data around the circumstances of the coaches you listed. I can't help it if you didn't do your homework.

Since you don't like when people disagree, and give data points to disagree, i'll turn things around.... 

What should be a reasonable time frame to install a dramatically different system/style?

What should be a reasonable time frame to populate a roster with quality player depth that fits the new system?

You said success in year 2 was the exception, but said a coach should be able to be successful before 3 years? So which is it? Are you talking about summer ball in year 2.5?

I'm still waiting on examples of coaches like Archie coming in from a lower conference, who inherit low talent, a sub .500 conf team, completely change a system, and are lights out in year 2? Nobody?

Go ahead, keep dancing...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

Those were not excuses. it was simple fact and data around the circumstances of the coaches you listed. I can't help it if you didn't do your homework.

Since you don't like when people disagree, and give data points to disagree, i'll turn things around.... 

What should be a reasonable time frame to install a dramatically different system/style?

What should be a reasonable time frame to populate a roster with quality player depth that fits the new system?

You said success in year 2 was the exception, but said a coach should be able to be successful before 3 years? So which is it? Are you talking about summer ball in year 2.5?

I'm still waiting on examples of coaches like Archie coming in from a lower conference, who inherit low talent, a sub .500 conf team, completely change a system, and are lights out in year 2? Nobody?

Go ahead, keep dancing...

The the logical fallacy where you make up things I never said and then refute those. Which you have done a pretty crap job of anyway. 

Theres no reason this team should still look like it doesn’t have a system. We barely beat a team that we were supposed to beat at home. A game where supposedly we had the Best if not the two best. 

I gave you tons of examples coaches that saw success before year 3 and you just made excuses. It shouldn’t take 3 years to teach kids not to turn it over and to hit their FTs. 

Hell Pitino won the conference before his team was even eligible for the tourney. It shouldn’t take 3 years to install a system. To perfect it, sure but for it to be recognizable no that should be in place by year 2. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

The the logical fallacy where you make up things I never said and then refute those. Which you have done a pretty crap job of anyway. 

Theres no reason this team should still look like it doesn’t have a system. We barely beat a team that we were supposed to beat at home. A game where supposedly we had the Best if not the two best. 

I gave you tons of examples coaches that saw success before year 3 and you just made excuses. It shouldn’t take 3 years to teach kids not to turn it over and to hit their FTs. 

Hell Pitino won the conference before his team was even eligible for the tourney. It shouldn’t take 3 years to install a system. To perfect it, sure but for it to be recognizable no that should be in place by year 2. 

The team doesn't look like it has a system? You're just arguing to argue. You can't possible believe that. If you do, may be time for you to watch another sport. 

 

Plus you stated earlier you thought this team would win 8-9 non conference games. They are at 6 wins with 2 cupcakes left. And a very good chance to win next Saturday and get to nine. So.....................?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, IUc2016 said:

The team doesn't look like it has a system? You're just arguing to argue. You can't possible believe that. If you do, may be time for you to watch another sport. 

 

Plus you stated earlier you thought this team would win 8-9 non conference games. They are at 6 wins with 2 cupcakes left. And a very good chance to win next Saturday and get to nine. So.....................?

Just because we winning doesn’t mean we have a system. Whats our offensive system then if it’s so obvious

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

The the logical fallacy where you make up things I never said and then refute those. Which you have done a pretty crap job of anyway. 

Theres no reason this team should still look like it doesn’t have a system. We barely beat a team that we were supposed to beat at home. A game where supposedly we had the Best if not the two best. 

I gave you tons of examples coaches that saw success before year 3 and you just made excuses. It shouldn’t take 3 years to teach kids not to turn it over and to hit their FTs. 

Hell Pitino won the conference before his team was even eligible for the tourney. It shouldn’t take 3 years to install a system. To perfect it, sure but for it to be recognizable no that should be in place by year 2. 

what did i make up? i even re-quoted you after you conflicted your own post. 

you gave poor examples of coaches/situations not remotely close to Archie and IU. 

FTs aren't a system. nobody is saying we shouldn't shoot FTs better. BTW, RP had a few teams that were awful at FTs... 

Again with Pitino. Someone who's not remotely close to Miller/IU situation, and is also no longer in the game because he cheated.

Still waiting for you to answer simple direct Qs. But keep dancing... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Irish YJ said:

what did i make up? i even re-quoted you after you conflicted your own post. 

you gave poor examples of coaches/situations not remotely close to Archie and IU. 

FTs aren't a system. nobody is saying we shouldn't shoot FTs better. BTW, RP had a few teams that were awful at FTs... 

Again with Pitino. Someone who's not remotely close to Miller/IU situation, and is also no longer in the game because he cheated.

Still waiting for you to answer simple direct Qs. But keep dancing... 

Rick Pitino inherited a team that had the best players leave after getting a postseason ban. It’s only not comparable because Pitino had it a lot worse. 

Lol you are going to find any excuse to discount anybody that did have success faster than Archie. 

Sinply because your excuses are so funny here’s another. Mike White

And FTs are most assuredly part of a system Archie even says his system is to draw fouls and go to the line 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rick Pitino inherited a team that had the best players leave after getting a postseason ban. It’s only not comparable because Pitino had it a lot worse. 
Lol you are going to find any excuse to discount anybody that did have success faster than Archie. 
Sinply because your excuses are so funny here’s another. Mike White
And FTs are most assuredly part of a system Archie even says his system is to draw fouls and go to the line 
Pitino and crean inherited similair situations. One succedded quickly and one got a four year excuse pass. Man was crean a bad hire. Archie will be fine.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just because we winning doesn’t mean we have a system. Whats our offensive system then if it’s so obvious

I don’t think we have a set offense like the motion. The closest concepts we run to a normal system would be iso. Some curls. I think everything starts with the pack line. Then transition from the pack line. If that doesn’t work offensively he starts using iso to work against a perceived weakness.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

Rick Pitino inherited a team that had the best players leave after getting a postseason ban. It’s only not comparable because Pitino had it a lot worse. 

Lol you are going to find any excuse to discount anybody that did have success faster than Archie. 

Sinply because your excuses are so funny here’s another. Mike White

And FTs are most assuredly part of a system Archie even says his system is to draw fouls and go to the line 

which Pitino team/situation are you talking about?

Archie is in the beginning of year two. Are you even going to give him this year to succeed?

BTW, Pitino actually had a slightly worse record his first year at KY. And how many wins has he vacated for cheating?

Mike White - the same Mike white that took over at FL after their coach went Pro. The same FL that went to the final four 2 years earlier lol... still waiting on a situation remotely close. 

FTs are a skill, not a system. The system get's the player to the line to shoot the FT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×