Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
52 minutes ago, hoosierbgh said:

Henry had every chance to commit first and waited too long. Besides, it was really Hunter who we took over him not Anderson. 

What? Aaron Henry wasn't offered until July 16, 2017. Later that very same evening Race Thompson committed. The following afternoon Jerome Hunter and Damezi Anderson committed. Henry's offer wasn't even 24 hours old. The kid barely had time to sleep on it before three forwards who had each held offers for over a month decided to jump aboard.

Posted

There are many reasons why the Big Ten doesn’t land as many 5* recruits as other conferences. Part of that isn’t playing the games other conferences play, who in the ACC hasn’t been brought up in some kind of scandal recently? Maybe Notre Dame.

The other is the style of play. I don’t see many other conferences allowing their bigs to just bump a driver off his line and calling it “good defense” or getting absolutely blown up at the rim just to have it ignored or a charge called.

I think the powers that be (long tenure coaches) like it this way because they can recruit more to that system and style of officiating.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Its great for the Wisconsins of the world. The only teams getting five stars are indiana, Ohio State, Mich State, and Michigan has gotten a few.

The big ten has also only won one national title since 1989 and 0 in 18 years so i guess its not just IU.

Sent from my SM-J700T using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, Maedhros said:

What? Aaron Henry wasn't offered until July 16, 2017. Later that very same evening Race Thompson committed. The following afternoon Jerome Hunter and Damezi Anderson committed. Henry's offer wasn't even 24 hours old. The kid barely had time to sleep on it before three forwards who had each held offers for over a month decided to jump aboard.

Henry wasn't officially offered until the 16th but he was being recruited well before then and he had the opportunity to commit when he was offered.  Regardless, Archie prioritized Hunter, who was and is by all reports far more talented if he had not had a health issue, over Henry. Anderson had nothing to do with Henry and even if he had, both then and now, we need/ed a rugged three point  shooter more than and undersized post.  

Posted

Who on our 2019 list do we have a real shot at landing now that Keion decided to go another way?
I don’t see us with any big fish for 2019.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

We already landed 5* McDAA Indiana Mr. Basketball Trayce Jackson-Davis. That’s a big fish.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
Will, Vic, JuMo, RoJo, Troy, TB, OG.  Out-of-state is basically all we got after Yogi's class and many complained that we weren't recruiting Indiana kids.  Now we land several Indiana kids and we're not attractive to out-of-state recruits.  Oh wait, Jerome is from Ohio.    God, I love this board.
Oops!  Forgot Race is from Minnesota.  

I was going to type this, but I’m barely conscious after smashing my head into the wall repeatedly.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted

Getting back to 2019 recruiting, I saw today that Lawrence Central’s Jake LaRavia has reopened his commitment. 6-8 and from what I read from Matt Glendale from the Star he can shoot and handle it. I’m his article he called him the most complete offensive player in the state of Indiana this last season. Curious to see if the staff will reach out. Anyone here seen him play?

Posted
http://inbasketballsource.com/recruiting-news/6072-jake-laravia-re-opens-recruitment
Would love to get a breakdown from someone who knows his game. Snow called him the best offensive player in Marion County. Read somewhere that he’s a year young for his class. Doesn’t turn 18 until Nov. Interesting. 

He sounds like a player we were hoping Fitzner would be, stretch 4


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
28 minutes ago, Old Friend said:

Help me.  Kid decommits from SIU-Edwardsville and all of a sudden he's capable of being a contributor at Indiana, but Luke Brown, who averages 35 points a game, can shoot the lights out, and has big time D1 interest isn't someone we should go after because he's got some limitations as a sophomore.

I'm not saying either are right or wrong, but I do laugh at the logic and reactions.

I was just throwing the name out there because it came up on twitter this evening that he decommited. I was just posting his name out of curiosity if anyone had seen the kid play. No one  mentioned him being capable to contribute here. There are literally only a few posts about who he is. Doesn’t have anything to do with Luke Brown. Sounds like youre reaching a little bit

Posted
Help me.  Kid decommits from SIU-Edwardsville and all of a sudden he's capable of being a contributor at Indiana, but Luke Brown, who averages 35 points a game, can shoot the lights out, and has big time D1 interest isn't someone we should go after because he's got some limitations as a sophomore.
I'm not saying either are right or wrong, but I do laugh at the logic and reactions.

Not sure about IU but he committed early to SIU-Edwardsville out of loyalty of them being the first to offer him. He then goes out his senior and has one of the most productive senior years of any senior. They fire their coach and he opened back up and many expect his phone to be ringing for the next couple weeks. No clue about IU but his phone will be busy


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
1 hour ago, Old Friend said:

Help me.  Kid decommits from SIU-Edwardsville and all of a sudden he's capable of being a contributor at Indiana, but Luke Brown, who averages 35 points a game, can shoot the lights out, and has big time D1 interest isn't someone we should go after because he's got some limitations as a sophomore.

I'm not saying either are right or wrong, but I do laugh at the logic and reactions.

Ok, I’ll try to help. One is a 6’8” kid who has gotten it done in one of the best Conferences in the State and who, because of both class and timing, is someone one would have to look at and make a relatively quick judgement about. The other is a 6’ kid who has gotten it done against a bunch of kids whose next career step is Church league. A kid who at the moment lacks the athleticism to play high D1, hence the reason he has, I believe, 0 offers but since he’s over 2 years from entering college has the time and opportunity to perhaps develop. Hence, he’s a follow, rather than an offer. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...