Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
We get that is your point but the numbers don't back it up 


As long as he can average 70, he will be good. I forget how far back it was, but someone posted only 4 of the last 32 champs had averaged less than 70 per game. He is the type of coach that could be in the 4, but there is a reason for that stat. I would definitely put him in that 2nd tier.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
6 minutes ago, mdn82 said:


As long as he can average 70, he will be good. I forget how far back it was, but someone posted only 4 of the last 32 champs had averaged less than 70 per game. He is the type of coach that could be in the 4, but there is a reason for that stat. I would definitely put him in that 2nd tier.


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

That's a skewed stat though. They intentionally play at a pace where 70 isn't likely. 

The raw number of 70 is a poor indicator. I'll take the ken Pom ranking any day of the week. 

Posted
That's a skewed stat though. They intentionally play at a pace where 70 isn't likely. 

The raw number of 70 is a poor indicator. I'll take the ken Pom ranking any day of the week. 


A skewed stat? Only 4 champions in the last 30+ years averaged under 70. How is that skewed?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...