Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 minutes ago, Brass Cannon said:

no proof Kansas is dirty but everybody with a clue knows they are

Kansas really has nothing to do with Vandy. 

Posted
Just now, WayneFleekHoosier said:


Do you consider "outside sources (shoe companies/agents with very difficult to prove connection to the university funding and directing players to certain programs dirty"?


If not, then yeah they aren't dirty.

If so, dem some dirty dogs.



Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

If they didn't get paid and their parents weren't paid. No I don't think that's dirty at all. That's good business. Or benefits. 

Posted

 This guy has insinuated the recruitment has been dirty the whole time, actually he even once called it a "a very dirty, dirty recruitment". And all of it is complete bogus. That's not Romeo or the people around him. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Brass Cannon said:

Except you seem to have no problem with people calling Kansas dirty but lots of issues calling Vandy dirty. 

Because there is absolutely no proof at this point!!!!! Lol you have none, zip zero. You're guessing. 

Posted
Just now, Brass Cannon said:

Same amount of proof as Kansas why don't you care about that?

Really same amount of proof.... 

This is just getting silly. Kansas has been fairly shady for awhile. Don't remember any ppl questioning Kevin Stallings. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Treesh said:

 


Curious as well. Ed was suppose to be our recruiting guy but I have yet to see him anywhere?


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

 

I think Ed was really brought in to get IU in the door for many of these recruits because of his in state connections and his player development. Not to be an actual recruiter. Plus bringing him in helped mend the fences with many of the in state high school coaches that had issues with FCTC. 

Posted
If they didn't get paid and their parents weren't paid. No I don't think that's dirty at all. That's good business. Or benefits. 

We halfway agree here.

I personally would be ok with agents and shoe companies paying top players if it was open and honest. Let all schools have a chance to land targeted player.

But to ignore that money is changing hands (not necessarily with Langford) is just oblivious to what's going on when there is direct evidence to certain players and therefore circumstantial evidence to all like talented players that command the same desire.


Sent from my iPad using BtownBanners mobile app
Posted
No way it affects this draft.  But may be a reason to back off hurt

Probably not but I will be the only one right if it does.

Also consider the potential impact on a lot of players that may be ruled ineligible to play college. Adam Silver is far more likely to get something done quick than other commissioners


Sent from my iPhone using BtownBanners mobile app

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...