JSHoosier Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 Any opinions on Dane Fife? He's not ready. Our former players are either not ready (Fife, Cheaney) or just not good coaches (Alford). hoosierpap 1 Quote
KingPG21 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 Any opinions on Dane Fife? He isn't ready for this type of position. hoosierpap 1 Quote
hper50 Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 Agreed that he's not ready, but I think he's closer than what most think ALASKA HOOSIER and 8bucks 2 Quote
coonhounds Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 Dane Fife is ready enough for me. A chance I would be willing to take ALASKA HOOSIER, Happydaze and Ryno6284 3 Quote
Naturalhoosier Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I've known the Drew family for over 40 years. I would take Bryce in a heartbeat. In addition to being darn fine basketball coaches, he and his dad are two of the most genuine people I know. I have no idea what happened with Scott. My deductive reasoning skills would say that Scott then takes after his mother. Stuhoo and Alford Bailey 2 Quote
MartintheMopMan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I have watched them several times. It's hard to gauge how those numbers would stack up playing better competition. 13 of there 19 wins are against teams with a +150 rpi.http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/rpi/_/teamId/2674 I agree, though as a point of order, the adjusted efficiency numbers are relative numbers. That is, Ken Pom's system believes when playing an average D1 basketball team, Valpo will hold them to .902 points per possession. According to the system, they lack significantly in offense. Quote
Uwe Robb Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I am intrigued now. Let me know if you guys see a Valpo game televised anytime soon. ALASKA HOOSIER 1 Quote
Uspshoosier Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I agree, though as a point of order, the adjusted efficiency numbers are relative numbers. That is, Ken Pom's system believes when playing an average D1 basketball team, Valpo will hold them to .902 points per possession. According to the system, they lack significantly in offense.i guess watching them lose 4 of 5 games might have left a negative image of Valpo. Granted I didn't watch them play northern Kentucky and uic where they only allowed 45 points I only watch them give up 70 plus to Oregon, Belmont, and wright st Quote
Uspshoosier Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I am intrigued now. Let me know if you guys see a Valpo game televised anytime soon.if they are not in tv try espn3 online that's where I've watched several of their games Quote
Uwe Robb Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 if they are not in tv try espn3 online that's where I've watched several of their games Conference tourneys will be on soon too. Might not make ESPN or EPSN2 until the championship game though. Quote
biteoftheapple Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I wouldnt want Drew. He has shown nothing to me. Let him win more. Quote
Uspshoosier Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 Conference tourneys will be on soon too. Might not make ESPN or EPSN2 until the championship game though.you are in luck Valpo vs Oakland this Friday on espnu southsidehoosier, Beowulf50, Feathery and 1 other 4 Quote
Feathery Posted February 15, 2016 Author Posted February 15, 2016 I wouldnt want Drew. He has shown nothing to me. Let him win more. He has won his conference 3 of 4 years. Soon to be 4 of 5 years. Can't expect more than that from a mid major program. Same conference Stevens made his name. You are pet of a tough crowd to please. southsidehoosier, MikeRoberts, ALASKA HOOSIER and 1 other 4 Quote
MartintheMopMan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 i guess watching them lose 4 of 5 games might have left a negative image of Valpo. Granted I didn't watch them play northern Kentucky and uic where they only allowed 45 points I only watch them give up 70 plus to Oregon, Belmont, and wright st I trust you have a better assessment than I do, I have not watched a single minute of Valpo. Actually, I think I watched the end of the Oregon game, but can't mentally separate it from Oregon's other games. I was just noting the purpose of the adjustments is to see how a team fares against an "average" opponent and remove the bias of a weak conference. So, when talking about adjusted stats, saying we don't know how they would fare against other opponents is technically true, but precisely what those stats are designed to overcome. They have only lost once when they held their opponent to fewer than 1 point per possession (Saturday). In interviews, Ken has acknowledged his system is less accurate in the bottom half of the league than the top, so some of Valpos numbers actually could be assisted by the difficultly of calculating the expected score of conference opponent "Illinois Chicago". I guess we will get at least 1 tourney game to see how they fare. Quote
Uspshoosier Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 I trust you have a better assessment than I do, I have not watched a single minute of Valpo. Actually, I think I watched the end of the Oregon game, but can't mentally separate it from Oregon's other games. I was just noting the purpose of the adjustments is to see how a team fares against an "average" opponent and remove the bias of a weak conference. So, when talking about adjusted stats, saying we don't know how they would fare against other opponents is technically true, but precisely what those stats are designed to overcome. They have only lost once when they held their opponent to fewer than 1 point per possession (Saturday). In interviews, Ken has acknowledged his system is less accurate in the bottom half of the league than the top, so some of Valpos numbers actually could be assisted by the difficultly of calculating the expected score of conference opponent "Illinois Chicago". I guess we will get at least 1 tourney game to see how they fare.they should have a good test Friday when they play Oakland who took Michigan st to overtime. That game will be on Friday on espnu if you want to check them out. I believe offensive and defensive adjusted efficiency numbers are a good guideline to start and I believe in those numbers I also like to use the "eye test" when reviewing teams productivity. Some might say I have a slight madness when it comes to watching college basketball. I will watch Oakland play wright st if it's the only game on ( they are on espnu right now). having said all this about Valpo and needed to proof it against better competition, from what I've seen in my opinion I think they are a good defensive team but like you said their struggles are on the offensive side of things. If you watched the end of the Oregon game then you would have had to watch it on the pac 12 network because that was the only channel it was on. That might let you separate it from other oregon games Quote
biteoftheapple Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 He has won his conference 3 of 4 years. Soon to be 4 of 5 years. Can't expect more than that from a mid major program. Same conference Stevens made his name. You are pet of a tough crowd to please. They have been a 13 and 14 seed. Eliminated in round 2 both years. What about that proves he is a winner? Quote
Brass Cannon Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 They have been a 13 and 14 seed. Eliminated in round 2 both years. What about that proves he is a winner? Not much less success than we have had with far fewer resources. Alford Bailey, MikeRoberts and 8bucks 3 Quote
biteoftheapple Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 UNI s Jacobsen has more quality wins than Drew. Quote
Brass Cannon Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 He hasn't been able to win the MVC in like 6 years? Don't see him building a consistent winner. Quote
MartintheMopMan Posted February 15, 2016 Posted February 15, 2016 they should have a good test Friday when they play Oakland who took Michigan st to overtime. That game will be on Friday on espnu if you want to check them out. I believe offensive and defensive adjusted efficiency numbers are a good guideline to start and I believe in those numbers I also like to use the "eye test" when reviewing teams productivity. Some might say I have a slight madness when it comes to watching college basketball. I will watch Oakland play wright st if it's the only game on ( they are on espnu right now). having said all this about Valpo and needed to proof it against better competition, from what I've seen in my opinion I think they are a good defensive team but like you said their struggles are on the offensive side of things. If you watched the end of the Oregon game then you would have had to watch it on the pac 12 network because that was the only channel it was on. That might let you separate it from other oregon games Eye test is definitely important. I'll miss Friday's game too, but since so many people here are watching it, I'll just pay attention to their analysis. Doesn't narrow it down at all for Oregon games, I watch them all through streaming sites so it's always the same. Maybe I'll find an older game and check them out though. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.