Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

A fantastic watch for you guys.

It is the anatomy of a crap defense. Voice over in a Sam Kinnison-like style fits perfectly. At first, I thought this might be a couple of anecdotal examples of how Kentucky was lost on defense. But no. Instead it is a whole-game long, long list of well-narrated video clips that show how completely lacking Kentucky is in defensive principles. The lack of defensive technique and basic principles by Oneyso (who repeatedly guards the post by forcing his man away from help) and Dillingham (whose defensive stance and pressure are non-existent), to Mitchell (who never jams a cutter) is a pretty compelling indictment of Calipari's ability to win with young or defensively lacking players.

If you want to see extensive proof of a poorly coached team? This is a must watch:

 

 

That is amazing. He even resembles Kinnison. But he is so spot-on it could be a nice virtual clinic for young players studying defensive techniques.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

One night later, ISU dropped 101 on a top-75 KenPom defense. Sure glad no one had to suffer through a slog like that!

I sense some bitterness

Posted
47 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

A fantastic watch for you guys.

It is the anatomy of a crap defense. Voice over in a Sam Kinnison-like style fits perfectly. At first, I thought this might be a couple of anecdotal examples of how Kentucky was lost on defense. But no. Instead it is a whole-game long, long list of well-narrated video clips that show how completely lacking Kentucky is in defensive principles. The lack of defensive technique and basic principles by Oneyso (who repeatedly guards the post by forcing his man away from help) and Dillingham (whose defensive stance and pressure are non-existent), to Mitchell (who never jams a cutter) is a pretty compelling indictment of Calipari's ability to win with young or defensively lacking players.

If you want to see extensive proof of a poorly coached team? This is a must watch:

 

 

Not surprising at all that his lone title team had uniquely talented defensive players in Davis and Kidd-Gilchrist. Not your typical 5* recruits. Jones/Lamb coming back for sophomore years and he had his "Can't F This Up" title team.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Uspshoosier said:

https://x.com/patmcafeeshow/status/1770861790613713358?s=46
may least Robbie got a little revenge on the NCAA.  lol.    He probably taken better than I did.  I’m still hot even though I knew they would be screwed.  Pat also said he would give ISU players 10,000 each if they win the NIT 

He knows he's getting a sweet NIL boost next year from the Chaifetz family treasure chest, so it's all good for the big man.

Posted
1 hour ago, Alford Bailey said:

It’s a day of mourning in Ky. Super talented team but I don’t think anyone is really surprised they lost.

The Kentucky formula of playing 4 or 5 5-star freshmen doesn't work.  You can win games, but you aren't going to win a title.  Kentucky will probably have 4 guys drafted in the first 35 picks of the NBA draft, but in college basketball, experience is an equalizer against young talent.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Class of '66 Old Fart said:

Oof!

Image

I could just see that when Woodson is gone that the administration's idea of a homerun hire would be Bennett. That way they could still stick it to the fans while saying, "We're trying." Yes, he's had some success but no so much recently and his style is painful to watch.

From 9:20 in the 1st until 16:37 in the 2nd they didn't score. That's just brutal. I feel  bad for their fans being subjected to that.

Posted
3 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

A fantastic watch for you guys.

It is the anatomy of a crap defense. Voice over in a Sam Kinnison-like style fits perfectly. At first, I thought this might be a couple of anecdotal examples of how Kentucky was lost on defense. But no. Instead it is a whole-game long, long list of well-narrated video clips that show how completely lacking Kentucky is in defensive principles. The lack of defensive technique and basic principles by Oneyso (who repeatedly guards the post by forcing his man away from help) and Dillingham (whose defensive stance and pressure are non-existent), to Mitchell (who never jams a cutter) is a pretty compelling indictment of Calipari's ability to win with young or defensively lacking players.

If you want to see extensive proof of a poorly coached team? This is a must watch:

 

 

LOVE this.  First, its the best thing i'll watch all day.  Second, his rage is hilarious.  And thirdly, It really shows how basketball IQ, coaching, and gameplanning can make all the difference.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...