Jump to content

Thanks for visiting BtownBanners.com!  We noticed you have AdBlock enabled.  While ads can be annoying, we utilize them to provide these forums free of charge to you!  Please consider removing your AdBlock for BtownBanners or consider signing up to donate and help BtownBanners stay alive!  Thank you!

BlueDevil

College Bball Thread

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Brass Cannon said:

You can say Duh on Williams. But he didn’t win one while at Kansas so he’s not really a great example. So once again not sure why you are saying duh

 I meant was that I forgot he didn't win at KU, not toward your post 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Brass Cannon said:

You can say Duh on Williams. But he didn’t win one while at Kansas so he’s not really a great example. So once again not sure why you are saying duh

He’s unequivocally an example of a great hire. He was an excellent coach and likely would’ve won at least one at Kansas if he had stayed.  As it was he kept them a powerhouse and went to FFs. 
 

Nobody has done a better job at managing their basketball program through high profile hires than Kansas, imo. Definitely that’s true over the last forty years. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, str8baller said:

 

Nobody has done a better job at managing their basketball program through high profile hires than Kansas, imo. Definitely that’s true over the last forty years. 

Not arguable in any way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

Hey Calipari - this is kind of weird. Here are his current comments on this #4 team nationally (hint: they won't finish the season in the top ten).

 

Cal is feeling some pressure. This is how most coaches feel.  He knows the rabid fanbase is ready to turn on him. And Titus and Tate and I want to know how long Oscar will be out.  This is pretty typical of him.  I love seeing it though because I can see through it.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, WayneFleekHoosier said:

Cal is feeling some pressure. This is how most coaches feel.  He knows the rabid fanbase is ready to turn on him. And Titus and Tate and I want to know how long Oscar will be out.  This is pretty typical of him.  I love seeing it though because I can see through it.  

He looks like a guy trying to explain to his landlord that his rent check will be sent any day now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Stuhoo said:

Hey Calipari - this is kind of weird. Here are his current comments on this #4 team nationally (hint: they won't finish the season in the top ten).

 

Wow...I missed this. This isn't a good look. I've never seen a coach lower expectations. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't going to this year but I decided why the hell not and did a Top 25. Gives me something to do on Monday morning while I'm off. 

College Basketball Top 25

1. North Carolina
2. Gonzaga
3. Houston
4. Kansas
5. Duke
6. Baylor
7. Kentucky
8. Creighton
9. UCLA
10. Texas
11. Tennessee
12. Auburn
13. TCU
14. Virginia
15. Arkansas
16. Alabama
17. Oregon
18. Villanova
19. Indiana
20. Michigan
21. Illinois
22. Arizona
23. San Diego State
24. Xavier
25. Texas Tech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Honkyman said:

Seems more realistic than many pre-season rankings.

For me it's just hard to say at this point -- what's "realistic?" 

One way to look at it, we are a veteran-loaded team that last season was missing a stud-level guard/on-ball play, now there in JHS who the NBA scouts are raving about and who looks fully ready to be dominant,

and another impact player, gained, minimally in Ren, who is at least very good, both major upgrades over who they're effectively replacing,

and with the vets comes expected growth in Bates, JG and Galloway, JG having significantly improved his play at the end of season into NCAA tourney play (but whose continuing growth remains to be seen), Bates who got the summer props and we haven't seen him live due to injury, and Galloway who just maybe is now shooting better,

and TJD is clearly primed for a big season and with less competition up front in the B1G.

So we need the pieces to all come together and shine to take a major step up from the fringe tourney team we were last year, but the pieces are there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, HoosierHoopster said:

For me it's just hard to say at this point -- what's "realistic?" 

One way to look at it, we are a veteran-loaded team that last season was missing a stud-level guard/on-ball play, now there in JHS who the NBA scouts are raving about and who looks fully ready to be dominant,

and another impact player, gained, minimally in Ren, who is at least very good, both major upgrades over who they're effectively replacing,

and with the vets comes expected growth in Bates, JG and Galloway, JG having significantly improved his play at the end of season into NCAA tourney play (but whose continuing growth remains to be seen), Bates who got the summer props and we haven't seen him live due to injury, and Galloway who just maybe is now shooting better,

and TJD is clearly primed for a big season and with less competition up front in the B1G.

So we need the pieces to all come together and shine to take a major step up from the fringe tourney team we were last year, but the pieces are there.

At the risk of repeating myself, three things:

  1. Replacing Parker Stewart with Jalen Hood Schifino,
  2. Replacing Michael Durr with Malik Reneau, and most importantly
  3. Year two of a majority of the team fully experienced in the system.

That makes us a realistic national contender IMO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

At the risk of repeating myself, three things:

  1. Replacing Parker Stewart with Jalen Hood Schifino,
  2. Replacing Michael Durr with Malik Reneau, and most importantly
  3. Year two of a majority of the team fully experienced in the system.

That makes us a realistic national contender IMO.

I'm not sure I'm ready to say we can be a national contender, but I think we should and will contend for top of the B1G, and depending on the draw, health etc. that we should have a good showing in the NCAA tourney. 

I can't tell yet what our outside shooting is going to look like -- how much Woodson/staff will use it. With this team, we have scoring and playmaking we didn't have or we're just starting to grow last season, I don't see 3-point shooting as holding us back from contending in the B1G, but I am in a wait and see mode on how Woodson / staff utilize the arc  -- and really how often -- guys like Kopp and Bates are shooting deep. Kopp is a set shooter, he's not going to be creating his own shots, but he should have lots of open shot looks, here's to hoping he's taking them, unlike last year, and that Bates -- and JG -- are taking and making more -- if that comes together, sky's the limit, imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, HoosierHoopster said:

I'm not sure I'm ready to say we can be a national contender, but I think we should and will contend for top of the B1G, and depending on the draw, health etc. that we should have a good showing in the NCAA tourney. 

I can't tell yet what our outside shooting is going to look like -- how much Woodson/staff will use it. With this team, we have scoring and playmaking we didn't have or we're just starting to grow last season, I don't see 3-point shooting as holding us back from contending in the B1G, but I am in a wait and see mode on how Woodson / staff utilize the arc  -- and really how often -- guys like Kopp and Bates are shooting deep. Kopp is a set shooter, he's not going to be creating his own shots, but he should have lots of open shot looks, here's to hoping he's taking them, unlike last year, and that Bates -- and JG -- are taking and making more -- if that comes together, sky's the limit, imo.

What do you think would be an acceptable result for the four marquee non-conference games?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

What do you think would be an acceptable result for the four marquee non-conference games?

I'm thinking 2-2. UNC is a beast but I think we pull it out at home, probably lose away at X (but have the talent to win), we'll definitely lose @KU imo, and I think we take down AZ on the neutral floor. But I can see either 1-3 or 3-1. I suppose 1-3 would be acceptable, but imo not if we're laying claim to our pre-season ranking. Time to step up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×