Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, IUHoosier5 said:

Should have not gone for the onside kick. Just idiotic. 

Yep. Said the same in a text thread to my friends. 
 

Ryan Day is the most thin skinned coach in America. he was going to try and acore there. Should’ve left it a 17 pt game and lobbied the committee. 
 

Hard to do for a guy like cig tho. I get it. 

Posted
1 minute ago, IUHoosier5 said:

Risk to reward. You cannot afford to give up any more points. The risk, to me, was not worth the possible reward. Just a poor decision IMO. 

I see that, but if Warde Manuel meant it when he said they watch the games as one of their main criteria then I’m not sure it mattered. Film won’t lie on that game. 

Posted
1 minute ago, IUHoosier5 said:

Risk to reward. You cannot afford to give up any more points. The risk, to me, was not worth the possible reward. Just a poor decision IMO. 

I was joking and agreeing with you by showing the futility of the onside kick.

Posted
Just now, IUHoosier5 said:

Risk to reward. You cannot afford to give up any more points. The risk, to me, was not worth the possible reward. Just a poor decision IMO. 

I trust in Cig…but I hope they post mortem their coaching that second half. Some not so great game management…

Posted
Yep. Said the same in a text thread to my friends. 
 
Ryan Day is the most thin skinned coach in America. he was going to try and acore there. Should’ve left it a 17 pt game and lobbied the committee. 
 
Hard to do for a guy like cig tho. I get it. 

If someone told me I sucked I would run it up too


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
Just now, str8baller said:

Yep. Said the same in a text thread to my friends. 
 

Ryan Day is the most thin skinned coach in America. he was going to try and acore there. Should’ve left it a 17 pt game and lobbied the committee. 
 

Hard to do for a guy like cig tho. I get it. 

Cig would have done the same, so I cannot fault Day. Cig made his decision and paid the price. 

Posted
Just now, DChoosier said:

Let’s go Army.

Need another sec team or psu to go down. Two loss ND probably gets in over IU. 
 

IU won’t even be able to play the common opponent game because ND made purdue look ridiculous. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, DChoosier said:

Looking like Ole Miss is going to go down. 
 

Let’s go Army.

 

Georgia beating UMASS (what a scheduling joke) so they should move up 10 spots or more.

Ole Miss has some life with a minute left at the Ole Miss 40

Posted
2 minutes ago, Hovadipo said:

see that, but if Warde Manuel meant it when he said they watch the games as one of their main criteria then I’m not sure it mattered. Film won’t lie on that game.

They don’t…lol. 
 

Its and ESPN and SEC affair. Film on a 17 point loss would’ve showed us as close except for two bonehead special teams plays. Annoncers were even lobbying for it. Now is just a curb stomping.

Posted

This season lined up really great for IU, we seemed to catch everyone at the right time, even this game we had the bye week to prepare. That is not going to happen next season and without Rourke, we may drop to the middle of the pack?

Posted

Need to take a long look at the play calling in this game. Multiple times ran for 6-7 yards on first down and then followed up with two passes. We needed to play a ball control game. Keep their offense on the sideline and eat clock.

As much as the special teams put us in a hole too deep to dig out of, the play calling did us no favors 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...