Transfer Portal w IU Interest

[AH1971 1,518]

22 minutes ago, hoosiersoxfan said:

Isn’t this what happened with Caleb Love last offseason before Love wound up at Arizona?

Yes and Terrance Shannon Jr the year before.

[HoosierHoopster 7,154]

2 hours ago, tyappleg said:

I'm pretty confident you can Sharpie in a starting lineup of:

Rice, Carlyle, Mbagko, Reneau, and Ballo.

With Galloway/Tucker/Portal Big as our top 8 guys.

9-12 will be Cupps, Leal, Newton, and one portal addition (in no particular order)

An 11ppg scorer as a freshman (with his talent) isn't transferring here to come off the bench.  Gallo thrives in a 6th man role and it's where he should be with the roster currently as constructed.  

You know, I’d love Gallo off the bench, think he’d thrive, could destroy other teams’ second units, but — I’ll be surprised if Woodson takes a key vet like Gallo off the bench. Hope you’re right

[RaceToTheTop 26,188]

1 hour ago, AH1971 said:

Objectively, I think Carlyle has a much higher overall ceiling than Rice. 

Rice is also a couple of years older than Carlyle because of the two years he had to take off.

[OKHOOSIER 2,605]

5 hours ago, HoosierHoopster said:

You know, I’d love Gallo off the bench, think he’d thrive, could destroy other teams’ second units, but — I’ll be surprised if Woodson takes a key vet like Gallo off the bench. Hope you’re right

Our ceiling with Gallo off the bench is much, much higher IMO. Gallo has been paid, and he has been here for a while, I would suspect he is more interested in a B1G title and deep March run versus who starts. He is going to get a boatload of minutes regardless. Our bench was the biggest issue last year even beyond the system. The drop off with even two bench pieces in was stark (AC talked about this via the numbers not too long ago), and what I envision here is much more 3 guard lineups. Whether Gallo or Tucker at the 3. Ballo probably doesnt project as a Ware level guy from a minutes perspective which leads me to think we will see way more small ball with MM at the 4 and either Ballo/MR at 5. Even without adding a couple more complimentary pieces, the current roster has so much more versatility on paper than last season. 

[Golfman25 5,593]

7 hours ago, HoosierHoopster said:

You know, I’d love Gallo off the bench, think he’d thrive, could destroy other teams’ second units, but — I’ll be surprised if Woodson takes a key vet like Gallo off the bench. Hope you’re right

Yep.  It would require Woodson to change.  Woodson likes senior vets.  He’s said it too many times to count.  I doubt Gallo comes off the bench.  

[RaceToTheTop 26,188]

25 minutes ago, Golfman25 said:

Yep.  It would require Woodson to change.  Woodson likes senior vets.  He’s said it too many times to count.  I doubt Gallo comes off the bench.  

Change….like bringing in guards through the portal?  He did that.

[Certified Sunshine Pumper 9,217]

1 minute ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Change….like bringing in guards through the portal?  He did that.

Yeah I'm confused by the point trying to be made. 

The starting lineup has never been an issue. I'd be pretty surpised if Carlyle doesn't start, but either way, we'll start our best 5. 

[Loaded Chicken Sandwich 8,704]

10 hours ago, AH1971 said:

Johnell Davis denied admission into Michigan. Sounds like he didn’t graduate after 4 years at FAU.

https://x.com/zyavierr/status/1781840927549473189?s=46

And that's why Dusty should have taken the Louisville job.

[Feathery 4,005]

2 hours ago, Golfman25 said:

Yep.  It would require Woodson to change.  Woodson likes senior vets.  He’s said it too many times to count.  I doubt Gallo comes off the bench.  

I agree, while in principle I think Woody likes vets over younger players. But he also seems to like NBA talent over college vets. Carlyle is an NBA talent and Galloway is not. It’s why I think Galloway comes off the bench and it’s a role he is better suited for.  

[Juwan Moye 285]

36 minutes ago, btownqb said:

Yeah I'm confused by the point trying to be made. 

The starting lineup has never been an issue. I'd be pretty surpised if Carlyle doesn't start, but either way, we'll start our best 5. 

I’d change that to “we’ll start our most talented 5” as I think our “best 5” wouldn’t include Malik playing next to Ballo.

Id expect our “best 5” to be Rice, Carlyle, Galloway, Mgbako, Ballo. That’s at least the most balanced lineup this amateurs eyes can see. Could change if Malik becomes a better shooter/perimeter defender or if Tucker comes on strong.

[Class of '66 Old Fart 85,181]

[lillurk 3,763]

1 hour ago, Golfman25 said:

Yep.  It would require Woodson to change.  Woodson likes senior vets.  He’s said it too many times to count.  I doubt Gallo comes off the bench.  

 

1 hour ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Change….like bringing in guards through the portal?  He did that.

 

1 hour ago, btownqb said:

Yeah I'm confused by the point trying to be made. 

The starting lineup has never been an issue. I'd be pretty surpised if Carlyle doesn't start, but either way, we'll start our best 5. 

Two things to add here:

1. Pretty sure I recall someone connected saying in Feb/March that Gallo had gone to the staff and said something like “I’m staying, I’ll be the 6th man if that’s what’s best, just go get Dudes.” Of course I can’t find that now, and can’t independently verify it, but that seems plausible (as does an inversion of that condo — coach tells senior “you’ll play plenty but as a gap filler”)

2. Gallo’s soph year — CMW’s first — is good proof of concept here, and was the design in ‘22-23 too until X’s injury forced their hand. 

[Stuhoo 81,478]

58 minutes ago, Feathery said:

I while in principle I think Woody likes vets over younger players. But he also seems to like NBA talent over college vets. Carlyle is an NBA talent and Galloway is not. It’s why I think Galloway comes off the bench and it’s a role he is better suited for.  

But Woody loves Galloway and has played him a ton all three years, including over more talented guys.

[OKHOOSIER 2,605]

18 minutes ago, lillurk said:

 

 

Two things to add here:

1. Pretty sure I recall someone connected saying in Feb/March that Gallo had gone to the staff and said something like “I’m staying, I’ll be the 6th man if that’s what’s best, just go get Dudes.” Of course I can’t find that now, and can’t independently verify it, but that seems plausible (as does an inversion of that condo — coach tells senior “you’ll play plenty but as a gap filler”)

2. Gallo’s soph year — CMW’s first — is good proof of concept here, and was the design in ‘22-23 too until X’s injury forced their hand. 

Exactly my thoughts, Gallo is an excellent complimentary piece to a good/great team. He is not a guy we should be needing to rely on for nearly 34 minutes a game due to zero other good options at the 2/3 or as a primary ball handler. That problem seems to have been solved. I would venture a bet his 3pt and FT shooting improves back closer to 30 and 60+ respectively with better looks and simply getting more rest while having less pressure to carry the load when MR/MM were on the bench. Woody has already hit the homerun we had to have, now if we can find a serviceable backup big and good shooter to fill out the bench it will be a grand slam in my eyes. 

[HoosierFan1994 4,754]

No matter what, Trey is getting 20-25 minutes a game. I believe he is the perfect 6th man. I can see him being Sixth Man of the Year like Sheehey and Bielfeldt. 

Speaking of Bielfeldt...I wish we could have a clone of him and Zeisloft for this team. They would fit perfectly with what is left. 

[Certified Sunshine Pumper 9,217]

1 hour ago, Juwan Moye said:

I’d change that to “we’ll start our most talented 5” as I think our “best 5” wouldn’t include Malik playing next to Ballo.

Id expect our “best 5” to be Rice, Carlyle, Galloway, Mgbako, Ballo. That’s at least the most balanced lineup this amateurs eyes can see. Could change if Malik becomes a better shooter/perimeter defender or if Tucker comes on strong.

Maliks a stud. He wouldn't come off the bench for me. 

[Certified Sunshine Pumper 9,217]

18 minutes ago, Stuhoo said:

But Woody loves Galloway and has played him a ton all three years, including over more talented guys.

Is the bold sarcasm?

[Golfman25 5,593]

1 hour ago, RaceToTheTop said:

Change….like bringing in guards through the portal?  He did that.

He brought guards through the portal in year one.  Tried in year two. 

[Certified Sunshine Pumper 9,217]

41 minutes ago, lillurk said:

 

 

Two things to add here:

1. Pretty sure I recall someone connected saying in Feb/March that Gallo had gone to the staff and said something like “I’m staying, I’ll be the 6th man if that’s what’s best, just go get Dudes.” Of course I can’t find that now, and can’t independently verify it, but that seems plausible (as does an inversion of that condo — coach tells senior “you’ll play plenty but as a gap filler”)

2. Gallo’s soph year — CMW’s first — is good proof of concept here, and was the design in ‘22-23 too until X’s injury forced their hand. 

No no. You can't believe "positive" rumors. Only the negative ones ;) 

[Stuhoo 81,478]

3 minutes ago, btownqb said:

Is the bold sarcasm?

Really it’s over higher rated players. Gallo is plenty talented.