Fire Coach Woodson Thread

[AH1971 1,306]

6 minutes ago, Banksyrules said:

And because those coaches were awful but Woodson is meh? You become ok with that? You keep pushing until you get it right.  The goal is championships not “yay we made the dance or yes we made it to the sweet sixteen” . Again recalibrate your goals. Forget the guy and just be honest with yourself…….. he’s not the guy.  

That’s your opinion. I’m willing to see how this year plays out with a top 10 roster. 

[Schreckbagger 612]

Comparing RMK with Woodson…. Wow.  Maybe you should apply for the athletics job because you seem to have a high opinion what in reality is very &^* coaching . 

Coach Mike Woodson's .612 winning percent. Third best in 59 years at IU. Wow.

Only the truth dude, only the truth.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[Home Jersey 5,695]

1 minute ago, Schreckbagger said:

Coach Mike Woodson's .612 winning percent. Third best in 59 years at IU. Wow.

Only the truth dude, only the truth.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Hang the banner!

EDIT: This is a dreadful statistic. Not evidence of success or building momentum...

"Just win" ... we can all agree on that. Let's see it. 

[Schreckbagger 612]

Hang the banner!
EDIT: This is a dreadful statistic. Not evidence of success or building momentum...
"Just win" ... we can all agree on that. Let's see it. 

Numbers don't lie, liars don't like numbers.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[Home Jersey 5,695]

6 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Numbers don't lie, liars don't like numbers.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

If you consider winning 6/10 games success, I guess what you said made sense. 

How many blowout losses too? 

[Schreckbagger 612]

In IU's toxic environment, being better than 9 other IU coaches actually makes sense.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[Hoosierfan2017 20,328]

27 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Coach Mike Woodson's .612 winning percent. Third best in 59 years at IU. Wow.

Only the truth dude, only the truth.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

Lmao no one gives a **** about your cherry-picked statistic. He barely beats the bottom feeders of the NCAA during the non-conference schedule, amazing! 31-29 in an incredibly mediocre Big Ten. 

[AZ Hoosier 6,243]

Coach Mike Woodson's .612 winning percent. Third best in 59 years at IU. Wow.

Only the truth dude, only the truth.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

That tells you has bad the program is. The only two with higher winning percentages were a legend that was a “catch lightning in a bottle” hire (RMK) and a guy who broke a stupid inconsequential rule that cause the administration to fall on its sword (Sampson). Mediocre Mike got third place by default.

[Hoosierfan2017 20,328]

1 hour ago, Banksyrules said:

Comparing RMK with Woodson…. Wow.  Maybe you should apply for the athletics job because you seem to have a high opinion what in reality is very &^* coaching . 

“Mike Woodson acts like *** just like Bob Knight but doesn’t win like him” really isn’t the selling point they think it is, lol. 

[WayneFleekHoosier 47,415]

13 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

In IU's toxic environment, being better than 9 other IU coaches actually makes sense.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

IU is one of the best fanbases in the nation. Top 5 in attendance no matter the results.  Have been incredibly patient despite years of bad results.  
 

But we need a “uniter” at this point and what Woody pulled last season with the “True Fan” and the social media presence has divided the fanbase worse than I think I’ve seen. I’m 43.  
It wouldn’t be that hard with our resources.  Our fanbase enjoys good, fundamental basketball and can recognize it.  Hustle plays, good shooting, defense, etc.  Hopefully this is the year it looks better on the court.  

[JSHoosier 19,700]

26 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Numbers don't lie, liars don't like numbers.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

No but they can be misleading. In this case his competition includes the likes of Mike Davis and Archie Miller. It's more an indictment of how incompetently run IU is than anything.

[Schreckbagger 612]

No but they can be misleading. In this case his competition includes the likes of Mike Davis and Archie Miller. It's more an indictment of how incompetently run IU is than anything.

What happened to "just win"?

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[go iu bb 5,258]

Outside of McCracken and Knight, IU has been pretty bad at hiring coaches. So Woodson is better than Miller, Crean, Dakich, and Davis? That's not exactly a statement of excellence.

[Schreckbagger 612]

Lmao no one gives a **** about your cherry-picked statistic. He barely beats the bottom feeders of the NCAA during the non-conference schedule, amazing! 31-29 in an incredibly mediocre Big Ten. 

More amazing, no one's gives a crapola about your opinions. If that Truth hurts, so be it. Numbers don't lie, cherry picked or not.

 

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

 

[Schreckbagger 612]

That tells you has bad the program is. The only two with higher winning percentages were a legend that was a “catch lightning in a bottle” hire (RMK) and a guy who broke a stupid inconsequential rule that cause the administration to fall on its sword (Sampson). Mediocre Mike got third place by default.

And you ain't getting another lightning in a bottle at IU. Sorry.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[Hoosierfan2017 20,328]

4 minutes ago, Schreckbagger said:

Numbers don't lie, cherry picked or not.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app
 

lol. Incredible. As I’ve said before, if only Woodson worked half as hard as you people do at defending him. 

[Schreckbagger 612]

IU is one of the best fanbases in the nation. Top 5 in attendance no matter the results.  Have been incredibly patient despite years of bad results.  
 
But we need a “uniter” at this point and what Woody pulled last season with the “True Fan” and the social media presence has divided the fanbase worse than I think I’ve seen. I’m 43.  
It wouldn’t be that hard with our resources.  Our fanbase enjoys good, fundamental basketball and can recognize it.  Hustle plays, good shooting, defense, etc.  Hopefully this is the year it looks better on the court.  

43 is just reaching puberty in IU Basketball years. Obviously, you missed the RMK division and the toxicity of Pyles Brand.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[Schreckbagger 612]

lol. Incredible. As I’ve said before, if only Woodson worked half as hard as you people do at defending him. 

I don't defend him, I just make fun of foolish critisms of him. And that's sooooo easy.

 

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

 

 

 

[Schreckbagger 612]

Outside of McCracken and Knight, IU has been pretty bad at hiring coaches. So Woodson is better than Miller, Crean, Dakich, and Davis? That's not exactly a statement of excellence.

Well, something scares off all the excellent coaches..... hummm. Just a statement of fact.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app

[Schreckbagger 612]

No but they can be misleading. In this case his competition includes the likes of Mike Davis and Archie Miller. It's more an indictment of how incompetently run IU is than anything.

I can't disagree with that last statement. Someone here can actually think logically.

However, winning percent is probably the least misleading statistic of all.

Sent from my SM-S906U using BtownBanners mobile app